2 FNC - 1 KRU
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 1.76 1.05 | 211 218 199 | 14 10 4 | / 7 3 4 / | 10 6 4 | +7 +7 0 | 83% 92% 67% | 145 154 126 | 35% 35% 36% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.41 1.25 1.73 | 331 316 362 | 19 12 7 | / 12 8 4 / | 6 4 2 | +7 +4 +3 | 83% 83% 83% | 186 192 174 | 29% 30% 27% | 6 4 2 | 2 1 1 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.39 1.51 1.14 | 213 213 215 | 15 11 4 | / 8 4 4 / | 5 2 3 | +7 +7 0 | 83% 83% 83% | 131 141 113 | 33% 35% 25% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.97 1.05 0.80 | 169 136 236 | 10 5 5 | / 9 6 3 / | 6 5 1 | +1 -1 +2 | 78% 83% 67% | 111 106 122 | 27% 28% 25% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.81 1.13 0.17 | 170 224 63 | 11 10 1 | / 12 7 5 / | 2 2 0 | -1 +3 -4 | 78% 92% 50% | 111 145 44 | 42% 45% 25% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.92 1.16 0.80 | 213 336 152 | 11 7 4 | / 15 6 9 / | 13 2 11 | -4 +1 -5 | 78% 100% 67% | 125 166 104 | 9% 11% 8% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.90 0.99 0.86 | 221 210 227 | 13 4 9 | / 15 4 11 / | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | 56% 67% 50% | 139 148 134 | 38% 42% 36% | 2 1 1 | 5 2 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.89 1.13 0.77 | 191 254 161 | 13 6 7 | / 12 4 8 / | 1 1 0 | +1 +2 -1 | 72% 83% 67% | 103 108 100 | 18% 5% 32% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.58 0.81 0.46 | 127 98 143 | 7 2 5 | / 15 3 12 / | 3 2 1 | -8 -1 -7 | 50% 83% 33% | 94 53 115 | 20% 17% 21% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.48 0.57 0.44 | 76 99 66 | 4 2 2 | / 12 5 7 / | 2 1 1 | -8 -3 -5 | 56% 67% 50% | 51 67 43 | 19% 20% 18% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.44 1.44 | 364 363 362 | 40 28 12 | / 27 19 8 / | 10 7 3 | +13 +9 +4 | 77% 79% 73% | 203 231 142 | 29% 34% 18% | 16 12 4 | 2 1 1 | +14 +11 +3 | |
|
1.43 1.04 1.31 | 226 238 199 | 29 22 7 | / 18 11 7 / | 10 5 5 | +11 +11 0 | 77% 79% 73% | 147 166 106 | 25% 25% 25% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.37 0.97 1.24 | 200 219 162 | 25 20 5 | / 17 10 7 / | 21 14 7 | +8 +10 -2 | 77% 79% 73% | 127 144 89 | 37% 38% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.17 0.88 1.08 | 181 164 217 | 23 15 8 | / 18 12 6 / | 13 10 3 | +5 +3 +2 | 83% 88% 73% | 115 112 123 | 25% 28% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.87 0.96 | 188 197 169 | 23 16 7 | / 22 15 7 / | 9 8 1 | +1 +1 0 | 83% 88% 73% | 119 130 94 | 32% 36% 20% | 3 1 2 | 5 4 1 | -2 -3 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.02 1.08 | 219 219 218 | 27 9 18 | / 25 7 18 / | 5 3 2 | +2 +2 0 | 69% 82% 63% | 132 109 143 | 22% 16% 24% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.09 0.86 0.93 | 232 289 204 | 26 12 14 | / 30 10 20 / | 15 2 13 | -4 +2 -6 | 71% 73% 71% | 136 144 133 | 17% 15% 17% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.72 0.73 0.73 | 142 95 164 | 15 3 12 | / 27 6 21 / | 9 4 5 | -12 -3 -9 | 60% 82% 50% | 98 58 116 | 22% 20% 23% | 1 0 1 | 5 1 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.86 0.45 0.58 | 121 170 98 | 15 7 8 | / 26 8 18 / | 5 2 3 | -11 -1 -10 | 60% 73% 54% | 68 79 63 | 22% 13% 30% | 2 0 2 | 3 0 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.54 0.61 0.55 | 165 137 181 | 19 5 14 | / 32 10 22 / | 6 2 4 | -13 -5 -8 | 43% 45% 42% | 106 95 110 | 37% 43% 35% | 2 1 1 | 11 5 6 | -9 -4 -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.64 1.08 | 396 411 361 | 21 16 5 | / 15 11 4 / | 4 3 1 | +6 +5 +1 | 71% 75% 60% | 221 270 103 | 29% 37% 8% | 10 8 2 | 0 0 0 | +10 +8 +2 | |
|
1.23 1.36 0.92 | 239 264 180 | 14 11 3 | / 10 7 3 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +4 0 | 71% 75% 60% | 164 192 97 | 19% 18% 25% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.20 1.30 0.98 | 192 191 194 | 13 10 3 | / 9 6 3 / | 7 5 2 | +4 +4 0 | 88% 92% 80% | 120 118 124 | 24% 27% 19% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.12 0.87 1.72 | 206 169 296 | 12 6 6 | / 10 8 2 / | 7 6 1 | +2 -2 +4 | 88% 83% 100% | 127 116 153 | 23% 25% 18% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.94 0.97 0.87 | 189 220 118 | 11 10 1 | / 10 7 3 / | 11 8 3 | +1 +3 -2 | 71% 67% 80% | 108 135 45 | 39% 42% 25% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 1.31 1.27 | 247 178 276 | 14 3 11 | / 13 3 10 / | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | 65% 80% 58% | 164 111 186 | 24% 36% 22% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.94 1.00 0.92 | 250 234 257 | 15 5 10 | / 15 4 11 / | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | 65% 40% 75% | 148 116 162 | 24% 23% 24% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.61 1.00 | 157 91 185 | 8 1 7 | / 12 3 9 / | 6 2 4 | -4 -2 -2 | 71% 80% 67% | 101 63 117 | 26% 25% 27% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.68 1.21 0.47 | 166 255 130 | 11 5 6 | / 14 3 11 / | 3 1 2 | -3 +2 -5 | 65% 80% 58% | 86 94 82 | 23% 7% 38% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.18 0.01 0.35 | 109 50 134 | 6 1 5 | / 17 6 11 / | 3 1 2 | -11 -5 -6 | 29% 20% 33% | 70 32 86 | 35% 50% 33% | 0 0 0 | 6 3 3 | -6 -3 -3 |
if the brazil teams lose they go to lower round 1, if fnatic win this and lose against sen they will go to lower round 2, brazil play 1 less game then them but losing will take them to the same spot. also its all randomized other then sen liquid and i think vikings so it was just unlucky for fnatic.
Ok now look at HS% of TL/FNC players and then look at HS% of KRU players lol, and it's not just one example, it's been going forever like this
KRU is worse both mechanically and tactically, if you believe that they have a chance in this match you are either biased or stupid
FNC should win under normal conditions but as the tournament PCs are not good they will not be able to show their best performance unlike KRU because in latam we do not have the best hardware so this will not affect them so I could rather say that it will become a advantage for this team
En español para mis hermanos latinos:
FNC deberia ganar en condiciones normales pero como los pcs del torneo no son buenos no podran mostrar su mejor rendimiento a diferencia de KRU pues en latam no tenemos el mejor hardware entonces esto no les afectara por lo que mas bien podria decir que llegara a ser una ventaja para este equipo
Quizá no me deje entender bien, quería decir que tristemente por nuestra precaria situación económica en Latam al inicio probablemente no usaron pcs muy buenas mas bien te podría asegurar que jugaron en calculadores por mucho tiempo por lo que tienen una ventaja respecto a otros jugadores pues ellos en la mayoría de su carrera no usaron buenas pcs muy al contrario de equipos europeos.
Maybe he does not let me understand well, I wanted to say that sadly due to our precarious economic situation in Latam at the beginning they probably did not use very good pcs but rather I could assure you that they played in calculators for a long time so they have an advantage over other players because they They did not use good PCs for most of their career, unlike European teams.
i'm worried about fnatic's lack of LAN experience. Literally 4/5 players in the team are teenagers with not much previous pro experience and Boaster was only in the UK cs scene. They should still win this though
also fnatic aren't scrimming any of the teams in iceland except liquid which could hurt them (or benefit them)
I think the point of LAN is, besides having 0 ping, to let the fans see live reactions of players after they make a play. I know they inserted a little cam on the right beside the agents, but I would like the production cast to switch to the players' face after they make a play. Just like other esports do (LoL, csgo, etc...) Just imagine seeing TenZ, ScreaM, any other great player getting 3K, 4K, or ACE and not showing their faces to the audience? Feels kinda off doesn't it?
Just saying though, each team deserves their spot in Iceland. They don't make it? They'll have to do better next Challengers. Do not belittle other teams' effort and journey just because your favourite team didn't make it. If you think Gambit or any team should make it instead of KRU or any other minor teams, Then it's just the regional differences. Gambit failed to beat Fnatic? Then be it. That's the EMEA for you. You probably know how close the region is relative. KRU fought tooth and nail by beating Infinity? Then that's LATAM. A whole set of challenges and differences that each team needs to overcome.
And it's still not a reason to put down each team and change them with another just because the said team lost to the ones that eventually qualified. There are the winners and the losers. There are the ones that qualified, and the ones that are watching from their home/team setups. That's how it is.
Wow what a logic dude...
One can give EMEA 1 slot and Japan 5 slots, and say "There are the ones that qualified, and the ones that are watching from their home/team setups. That's how it is." Why not lol.
Maybe Riot should think about providing more opportunities for EMEA in the future VCT events, because what we are going to see at this event will tell a lot about which regions are dominant, and which are weak.
And I have no doubt that Liquid / Fnatic will finish on top, Gambit would too, if only there were 3 spots.
One can give EMEA 1 slot and Japan 5 slots, and say "There are the ones that qualified, and the ones that are watching from their home/team setups. That's how it is." Why not lol.
There will be dominant and weak regions. That's the nature of esports and competition as long as the concept existed. I have hope that RIOT will learn from Reykjavik and make some changes for the next Challengers/Masters. What you said is ridiculous and you know RIOT will never let that happen. But me and you aren't RIOT.
And I'm not sure if that's your EU bias is showing, but man you've been on a roll with these comments. You're just salty that Gambit lost to Fnatic and didn't make it to Masters, didn't you?