This one will be interesting
LOUD 2x0 but close maps
completed
... 52 more matches
Friday, April 21st
3:00 PM EDT
Patch 6.06
LOUD ban Fracture; SEN ban Icebox; LOUD pick Pearl; SEN pick Haven; LOUD ban Lotus; SEN ban Split; Ascent remains
Betting
$100 on
LOUD
returned
$113 at 1.13 pre-match odds
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Maps/Stats
6
LOUD
5 /
1
Pearl
PICK
1:00:48
Sentinels
7 /
6
13
LOUD 
SEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.01 0.74 1.17 | 188 156 208 | 12 3 9 | / 14 6 8 / | 2 2 0 | -2 -3 +1 | 68% 71% 67% | 138 120 150 | 30% 22% 34% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.92 0.98 0.89 | 215 261 189 | 14 7 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 0 5 | 0 +1 -1 | 68% 57% 75% | 135 155 124 | 34% 29% 39% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.83 0.56 0.99 | 202 118 251 | 13 3 10 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 3 4 | -3 -3 0 | 63% 57% 67% | 121 66 153 | 17% 0% 24% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.66 0.58 0.70 | 153 121 172 | 11 3 8 | / 16 6 10 / | 0 0 0 | -5 -3 -2 | 63% 43% 75% | 104 82 116 | 45% 30% 58% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.63 0.16 0.90 | 140 58 189 | 8 1 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 14 4 10 | -9 -6 -3 | 58% 43% 67% | 73 26 101 | 12% 0% 16% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.45 1.10 2.05 | 283 218 395 | 20 10 10 | / 13 8 5 / | 11 6 5 | +7 +2 +5 | 84% 83% 86% | 165 117 247 | 35% 27% 42% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
|
1.31 1.16 1.55 | 189 165 230 | 13 7 6 | / 8 6 2 / | 7 4 3 | +5 +1 +4 | 79% 67% 100% | 132 131 133 | 17% 20% 15% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
1.23 1.49 0.77 | 247 331 104 | 15 13 2 | / 13 10 3 / | 6 3 3 | +2 +3 -1 | 68% 67% 71% | 175 212 112 | 39% 43% 25% | 4 4 0 | 2 1 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
|
1.07 0.54 1.97 | 191 114 323 | 15 5 10 | / 13 10 3 / | 7 6 1 | +2 -5 +7 | 79% 75% 86% | 111 64 193 | 21% 19% 23% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
1.01 1.22 0.65 | 200 254 109 | 14 11 3 | / 11 7 4 / | 5 3 2 | +3 +4 -1 | 63% 58% 71% | 123 151 74 | 22% 38% 0% | 2 2 0 | 6 4 2 | -4 -2 -2 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.31 1.44 1.39 | 262 253 279 | 64 26 38 | / 39 19 20 / | 6 3 3 | +25 +7 +18 | 73% 57% 86% | 171 148 189 | 30% 36% 26% | 9 4 5 | 5 3 2 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.77 1.26 1.04 | 233 184 273 | 55 18 37 | / 48 23 25 / | 26 12 14 | +7 -5 +12 | 83% 82% 83% | 134 106 155 | 17% 17% 17% | 9 1 8 | 2 1 1 | +7 0 +7 | |
|
|
0.84 1.00 0.93 | 185 195 179 | 38 18 20 | / 41 20 21 / | 16 3 13 | -3 -2 -1 | 72% 64% 78% | 124 132 118 | 21% 18% 24% | 9 4 5 | 8 4 4 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.69 1.03 0.88 | 174 156 184 | 37 13 24 | / 45 22 23 / | 25 11 14 | -8 -9 +1 | 72% 75% 69% | 113 97 124 | 26% 20% 30% | 4 3 1 | 10 5 5 | -6 -2 -4 | |
|
0.64 0.86 0.76 | 126 95 149 | 29 11 18 | / 44 21 23 / | 34 11 23 | -15 -10 -5 | 73% 64% 81% | 77 56 93 | 20% 14% 25% | 2 1 1 | 6 2 4 | -4 -1 -3 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.91 1.86 1.33 | 258 180 359 | 58 24 34 | / 44 26 18 / | 26 10 16 | +14 -2 +16 | 80% 69% 93% | 166 113 234 | 32% 28% 34% | 4 0 4 | 4 2 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.24 1.13 1.19 | 233 266 193 | 51 33 18 | / 44 28 16 / | 16 9 7 | +7 +5 +2 | 67% 64% 71% | 151 158 143 | 30% 34% 26% | 9 5 4 | 10 6 4 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.95 1.05 0.99 | 211 241 176 | 46 29 17 | / 47 31 16 / | 12 5 7 | -1 -2 +1 | 66% 56% 79% | 144 153 132 | 23% 23% 24% | 12 10 2 | 10 7 3 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
|
0.99 0.90 0.95 | 165 151 180 | 36 20 16 | / 38 22 16 / | 14 7 7 | -2 -2 0 | 69% 61% 79% | 118 112 126 | 16% 14% 19% | 4 1 3 | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.31 0.84 0.54 | 113 74 153 | 26 8 18 | / 50 31 19 / | 22 14 8 | -24 -23 -1 | 59% 58% 61% | 63 49 82 | 22% 21% 23% | 2 0 2 | 5 4 1 | -3 -4 +1 |
13
LOUD
7 /
6
Haven
PICK
1:27:26
Sentinels
5 /
6
11
LOUD
SEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.60 1.74 1.46 | 301 321 281 | 28 15 13 | / 13 7 6 / | 2 1 1 | +15 +8 +7 | 75% 58% 92% | 183 182 183 | 27% 30% 23% | 5 3 2 | 1 1 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
|
1.02 0.74 1.30 | 211 163 260 | 16 6 10 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 2 4 | 0 -2 +2 | 71% 67% 75% | 147 113 181 | 22% 13% 31% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
0.86 0.58 1.14 | 220 184 257 | 19 7 12 | / 20 11 9 / | 13 7 6 | -1 -4 +3 | 83% 83% 83% | 119 104 134 | 25% 33% 19% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
|
0.73 0.85 0.61 | 109 114 106 | 10 6 4 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 3 6 | -6 -2 -4 | 79% 75% 83% | 81 83 80 | 27% 24% 31% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
|
0.65 0.73 0.57 | 121 134 109 | 9 5 4 | / 16 7 9 / | 10 3 7 | -7 -2 -5 | 71% 83% 58% | 86 84 88 | 29% 20% 38% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.57 1.35 1.80 | 276 220 332 | 23 10 13 | / 14 7 7 / | 9 3 6 | +9 +3 +6 | 88% 83% 92% | 188 146 230 | 39% 36% 40% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
1.19 1.04 1.34 | 259 241 279 | 23 12 11 | / 18 10 8 / | 3 1 2 | +5 +2 +3 | 79% 67% 92% | 159 133 185 | 20% 16% 26% | 5 4 1 | 3 2 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
|
1.17 1.05 1.29 | 229 254 206 | 18 10 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 6 3 3 | +2 0 +2 | 67% 67% 67% | 146 151 140 | 39% 31% 50% | 4 2 2 | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
0.86 1.10 0.62 | 142 151 135 | 12 7 5 | / 14 7 7 / | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | 79% 75% 83% | 113 118 107 | 18% 12% 27% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.29 0.30 0.28 | 65 62 70 | 5 2 3 | / 20 10 10 / | 8 4 4 | -15 -8 -7 | 50% 58% 42% | 46 50 42 | 26% 30% 22% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
13
LOUD
9 /
4
Ascent
48:47
Sentinels
3 /
5
8
LOUD
SEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.80 1.31 2.17 | 332 263 384 | 25 8 17 | / 10 6 4 / | 4 2 2 | +15 +2 +13 | 81% 67% 92% | 218 153 267 | 29% 48% 18% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
1.45 1.19 1.64 | 278 235 311 | 23 8 15 | / 12 6 6 / | 6 2 4 | +11 +2 +9 | 100% 100% 100% | 162 140 179 | 14% 15% 13% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
|
1.02 0.60 1.34 | 212 184 234 | 16 5 11 | / 15 9 6 / | 13 6 7 | +1 -4 +5 | 76% 67% 83% | 119 98 136 | 20% 17% 22% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
|
0.93 0.72 1.08 | 129 99 153 | 11 4 7 | / 11 6 5 / | 11 4 7 | 0 -2 +2 | 81% 67% 92% | 76 45 99 | 23% 8% 32% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.83 0.87 0.80 | 130 187 88 | 8 5 3 | / 11 6 5 / | 5 1 4 | -3 -1 -2 | 76% 67% 83% | 88 139 50 | 10% 19% 4% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.37 1.44 1.29 | 269 291 241 | 19 12 7 | / 17 11 6 / | 5 3 2 | +2 +1 +1 | 71% 67% 78% | 184 171 201 | 29% 33% 24% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
0.94 0.30 1.80 | 215 103 367 | 15 4 11 | / 17 11 6 / | 6 1 5 | -2 -7 +5 | 67% 42% 100% | 142 78 228 | 22% 18% 24% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
|
0.74 0.70 0.79 | 164 137 201 | 11 6 5 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 2 2 | -5 -3 -2 | 48% 42% 56% | 112 88 145 | 14% 11% 17% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
|
0.55 0.31 0.87 | 127 152 96 | 8 4 4 | / 16 11 5 / | 3 1 2 | -8 -7 -1 | 48% 33% 67% | 98 115 77 | 16% 16% 20% | 3 2 1 | 5 4 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
|
0.35 0.08 0.70 | 82 47 131 | 6 1 5 | / 17 11 6 / | 7 4 3 | -11 -10 -1 | 52% 42% 67% | 40 34 49 | 21% 14% 25% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
The battle between Sentinels and Loud in Valorant has been a topic of debate among fans of the game. Both teams have shown exceptional skills and strategies, making it difficult to predict who will come out on top.
Sentinels, known for their defensive playstyle, have proven themselves to be a formidable opponent. Their ability to hold down sites and prevent enemy advances has earned them numerous victories. On the other hand, Loud's aggressive approach has also yielded impressive results. Their ability to push forward and take control of the map has left opponents scrambling.
Ultimately, the outcome of this matchup will depend on which team can execute their game plan more effectively. Will Sentinels be able to withstand Loud's relentless attacks? Or will Loud overpower Sentinels with their aggressive tactics?
Regardless of who comes out victorious, this matchup is sure to be an intense and exciting display of skill and strategy in Valorant.
this is what chat GPT has to say about the match lolol
Sentinels is a professional esports organization that fields teams in multiple games, including VALORANT. They are considered one of the top VALORANT teams in North America, and have won several major tournaments including the Masters Reykjavik and the VCT Stage 2 Masters. The team is known for its aggressive playstyle and strong individual skill.
LOUD is a Brazilian esports organization that also fields a VALORANT team. They have had some notable performances in regional tournaments, but have not yet achieved the same level of success as Sentinels. However, the team has been steadily improving and could potentially pose a challenge to Sentinels or other top teams.
Overall, the upcoming match between Sentinels and LOUD will likely be highly competitive and could go either way. Both teams have talented players and unique playstyles, so it will be interesting to see how they match up against each other. Fans of VALORANT esports will surely be eagerly anticipating the matchup.
nah bro thats what chat GPT really said:
In the days following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America, conspiracy theorists across the ideological spectrum dismissed the widely accepted version of events and instead crafted alternative narratives about the perpetrators, their motive, and other details about the attacks. Some of these conspiratorial claims directly implicated Jewish people and Israel in the attacks, in a continuation of centuries-old antisemitic tropes about Jews supposedly manipulating world events for their own benefit.
Two decades later, antisemitic 9/11 conspiracy theories continue to thrive. Although many of the original conspiracy theorists from 20 years ago remain active, a new generation of antisemites has joined them. This report highlights some of these themes and the many individuals who, despite their often-disparate ideologies, are united in their belief that Jews or Israel played a role in the 9/11 attacks.
A Web of Conspiratorial Beliefs
For twenty years, 9/11 conspiracy theories have served as a paradigm for conspiratorial takes on other tragedies and events. No mass shooting, natural disaster, disease outbreak, election or geopolitical incident occurs without a cadre of conspiracy theorists claiming that mainstream and scientific explanations for the events are “impossible.”
Conspiratorial “truther” subcultures, fueled by the internet and social media, wildly speculate about “false flags,” embark on amateur efforts to uncover “who benefits” and make allegations about national or international plots and coverups. Grifters, attention seekers and trolls present themselves as “experts,” and dramatically oversimplify complex phenomena for a global network of followers.
Unfortunately, the antisemitism that ADL has documented for the past twenty years regarding 9/11 conspiracy theories can also be found in many of these other “truther” communities. Antisemites attribute mass shootings in the U.S., including Sandy Hook and El Paso, as well as the Charlie Hebdo attack in France, to the machinations of Jews or Zionists. Some conspiracy theorists draw direct lines between alleged Jewish responsibility for the 9/11 attacks and the 2008 financial crisis. There has been an outpouring of antisemitic conspiracy theories regarding the involvement of Jews and Israel in the Covid-19 pandemic and in the development of vaccines. Jews and Zionists have also been blamed for the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.
We know that conspiracy theories can motivate real-world behavior, including acts of extremism and violence. Pittsburgh synagogue shooter Robert Bowers was inspired to attack the Tree of Life synagogue because he believed in conspiracy theories regarding the involvement of Jewish people in mass immigration, and likewise, many participants in the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th were fueled by conspiracy theories.
I don't know what else to say but this roster is much better. Zekken seems to be a lot more constrained as a duelist, unlike Tenz. Now Im not saying Tenz is the problem but he was a major reason they were losing. Tenz had 3 first kills and 15 first deaths in the NRG game and 5 first kills and 13 first deaths against Leviathan. Unfortunately, that means he just isn't that good of a duelist compared to Zekken who on pearl went 7 first kills to 3 first deaths on split as raze. Sacy looks so much better on his comfort role and so does marved on the controller. Unforunately, I do believe Tenz should become the sixth man and put Zekken on duelist, depth on flex, marved on the controller, Pancada on sentinel, and Sacy on the initiator. Any tenz fanboys who disagrees just look at the stats of the past games he just has a tendency over heating and this not only benefits him but the entire team as seen in map one.
Discord