oof
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
3
7
-4
|
5
5
+0
|
8
9
-1
|
7
4
+3
|
6
3
+3
|
vanity
V1
|
5
4
+1
|
5
5
+0
|
4
8
-4
|
4
8
-4
|
7
9
-2
|
jammyz
V1
|
4
10
-6
|
11
4
+7
|
11
8
+3
|
8
6
+2
|
2
4
-2
|
Zellsis
V1
|
12
4
+8
|
9
9
+0
|
4
7
-3
|
9
7
+2
|
10
9
+1
|
penny
V1
|
8
5
+3
|
7
8
-1
|
12
9
+3
|
7
5
+2
|
11
6
+5
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
jammyz
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
3
1
+2
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
penny
V1
|
1
1
+0
|
3
1
+2
|
3
3
+0
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
jammyz
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
penny
V1
|
2
1
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
2
0
+2
|
4
0
+4
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
jammyz
V1
|
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
2
|
1
|
effys
V1
|
|
4
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
45
|
9
|
2
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
6
|
3
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
3
|
2
|
penny
V1
|
|
8
|
3
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
vanity
V1
|
|
4
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
4
|
0
|
zepher
CR
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
2
|
rion
CR
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
4
|
0
|
Medusa
CR
|
|
7
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
59
|
8
|
0
|
neth
CR
|
|
6
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
50
|
5
|
2
|
Munchkin
CR
|
|
10
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
63
|
0
|
0
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
2
3
-1
|
2
5
-3
|
5
3
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
vanity
V1
|
3
2
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
0
5
-5
|
2
4
-2
|
3
5
-2
|
jammyz
V1
|
2
5
-3
|
7
2
+5
|
5
4
+1
|
5
2
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
Zellsis
V1
|
5
0
+5
|
4
4
+0
|
3
5
-2
|
7
4
+3
|
4
4
+0
|
penny
V1
|
5
2
+3
|
4
3
+1
|
5
6
-1
|
1
3
-2
|
6
2
+4
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
jammyz
V1
|
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
penny
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
|
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
jammyz
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
penny
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
jammyz
V1
|
|
4
Round 7
neth
rion
Round 8
zepher
rion
Round 11
Medusa
rion
Round 20
rion
Munchkin
|
1
Round 16
rion
Medusa
neth
|
|
|
2
Round 16
neth
Round 24
Medusa
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
1
|
1
|
effys
V1
|
|
3
Round 1
Medusa
neth
Round 11
Munchkin
zepher
Round 22
Munchkin
zepher
|
1
Round 18
Munchkin
rion
zepher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
6
|
1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
2
Round 3
rion
Munchkin
Round 12
rion
zepher
|
3
Round 2
rion
Munchkin
neth
Round 5
zepher
Medusa
rion
Round 22
Medusa
neth
rion
|
1
Round 21
Munchkin
rion
Medusa
neth
|
|
1
Round 22
rion
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
1
|
0
|
penny
V1
|
|
3
Round 7
Medusa
zepher
Round 12
neth
Munchkin
penny
Round 17
neth
Munchkin
|
1
Round 4
Munchkin
neth
zepher
|
1
Round 6
zepher
rion
neth
Medusa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
0
|
0
|
vanity
V1
|
|
1
Round 24
neth
rion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
1
|
0
|
zepher
CR
|
|
3
Round 13
penny
effys
Round 19
vanity
effys
Round 20
Zellsis
effys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
2
|
rion
CR
|
|
3
Round 1
penny
Zellsis
Round 21
vanity
penny
Round 22
effys
vanity
|
1
Round 15
effys
Zellsis
jammyz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
1
|
0
|
Medusa
CR
|
|
6
Round 4
Zellsis
effys
Round 10
jammyz
penny
Round 12
vanity
Zellsis
Round 17
penny
effys
Round 19
penny
Zellsis
Round 24
effys
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 12
effys
penny
|
1
Round 3
Zellsis
effys
penny
|
|
|
51
|
4
|
0
|
neth
CR
|
|
1
Round 14
jammyz
penny
|
1
Round 23
vanity
effys
jammyz
|
|
|
|
1
Round 23
jammyz
effys
|
|
|
|
28
|
2
|
1
|
Munchkin
CR
|
|
5
Round 10
effys
Zellsis
Round 15
vanity
penny
Round 20
penny
vanity
Round 22
penny
jammyz
Round 23
Zellsis
penny
|
|
1
Round 8
penny
effys
vanity
Zellsis
|
|
|
1
Round 8
Zellsis
vanity
|
|
|
|
75
|
0
|
0
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
1
4
-3
|
3
0
+3
|
3
6
-3
|
4
2
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
vanity
V1
|
2
2
+0
|
4
4
+0
|
4
3
+1
|
2
4
-2
|
4
4
+0
|
jammyz
V1
|
2
5
-3
|
4
2
+2
|
6
4
+2
|
3
4
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
Zellsis
V1
|
7
4
+3
|
5
5
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
6
5
+1
|
penny
V1
|
3
3
+0
|
3
5
-2
|
7
3
+4
|
6
2
+4
|
5
4
+1
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
jammyz
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
2
1
+1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
penny
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
neth
CR
|
Medusa
CR
|
Munchkin
CR
|
rion
CR
|
zepher
CR
|
|
effys
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
jammyz
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
3
0
+3
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
jammyz
V1
|
|
1
Round 6
Munchkin
Medusa
|
|
1
Round 4
neth
Medusa
neth
rion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
1
|
0
|
effys
V1
|
|
1
Round 15
Munchkin
neth
|
2
Round 5
zepher
Munchkin
rion
Round 9
rion
Munchkin
Medusa
|
|
|
|
1
Round 15
neth
Munchkin
|
1
Round 5
rion
zepher
Munchkin
|
|
|
46
|
3
|
1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
4
Round 6
zepher
neth
Round 8
Medusa
zepher
Round 13
Medusa
neth
Round 18
zepher
Medusa
|
|
|
|
1
Round 19
neth
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
2
|
2
|
penny
V1
|
|
5
Round 7
rion
Munchkin
Round 8
rion
neth
Round 16
Medusa
Munchkin
Round 19
rion
zepher
Round 23
Munchkin
zepher
|
2
Round 17
zepher
Medusa
Munchkin
Round 22
zepher
Munchkin
rion
|
1
Round 2
zepher
Medusa
Munchkin
rion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
0
|
0
|
vanity
V1
|
|
3
Round 1
Medusa
neth
Round 5
neth
Medusa
Round 15
zepher
Medusa
|
|
1
Round 4
Munchkin
zepher
zepher
Munchkin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
3
|
0
|
zepher
CR
|
|
4
Round 7
penny
Zellsis
Round 13
penny
Zellsis
Round 16
penny
vanity
Round 20
Zellsis
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 13
Zellsis
penny
|
|
|
|
41
|
0
|
0
|
rion
CR
|
|
5
Round 5
Zellsis
vanity
Round 10
jammyz
vanity
Round 14
effys
vanity
Round 17
penny
jammyz
Round 20
effys
jammyz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
3
|
0
|
Medusa
CR
|
|
1
Round 10
Zellsis
penny
|
2
Round 4
Zellsis
vanity
penny
Round 6
vanity
Zellsis
penny
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
4
|
0
|
neth
CR
|
|
5
Round 3
vanity
jammyz
Round 12
penny
effys
Round 14
Zellsis
jammyz
Round 21
effys
jammyz
Round 22
effys
Zellsis
|
2
Round 15
vanity
Zellsis
penny
Round 19
penny
jammyz
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
1
Round 22
Zellsis
penny
|
|
|
|
72
|
3
|
1
|
Munchkin
CR
|
|
5
Round 3
penny
effys
Round 16
jammyz
effys
Round 19
effys
vanity
Round 21
Zellsis
penny
Round 22
jammyz
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
0
|
0
|
Anime fans downfragging me for spitting facts LUL mixwell confirms what i expected from this japanese bots https://clips.twitch.tv/ProtectivePoorPorcupineMrDestructoid-1NmovVv0iNJDreeX
I'm going to go with a 2-1 for CR and map 3 goes to OT. V1's win condition is vanity. He's always been a good IGL and has brought this team to this point. Now he needs to deal with the temporary addition of jammyz and one of his first LANs(iirc). I was never a diehard cs esports fan but from my knowledge, vanity began to shine at the start of the online era when he was on Chaos so he needs to perform on LAN and get jammyz incorporated into the team if V1 wants to win this. Also penny and Zellsis need to ball out. They are incredible players but are very inconsistent so if they show up, V1 should definitely win. Honestly, of all the teams in this tourney, I have the most questions about V1, especially about how they'll perform on LAN.
Well while you are correct that vanity improved in the online era, hes been to 16 LANs including a minor in 2019. While this is the biggest lan hes been to, he does have experience offline. I personally have CR taking this solely because of jammys. If they had wippie I'd consider this to be much closer and probably v1 taking it.
why you getting downfragged LULW. they play puggy but don't have the same mechanics as the major regions to support it (as shown by the fact that they lost a 4 v 5 with sentinel's 2nd most impactful player off = that they are mechanically outclassed if they play 1 v 1s and this gem of a clip https://clips.twitch.tv/CalmVainShingleSSSsss-dqbGX5-Cot78XN8M how does a pro player miss half a clip. how does a pro team not have anyone protecting the sova in a straightforward 2 v 2) On top of this, just run through their match history. Against any team they regard as competent they ONLY have one comp on all maps except bind. And its an outdated one at that, without a single sign of astra or viper. The double duelist genuinely feels at least 2 metas behind (i.e skipped the skye/breach meta as well).
CR 2-1
Munchkin on Raze is a genuine threat, Neth can switch between duelist and sentinels pretty well, and the team overall is very balanced. V1 coming in with a sub will hinder a lot of momentum, and despite Vanity's IGL'ing and coordination, I don't think V1 will be able to overcome their struggle and be the first team to go to the lower bracket in Iceland.
nah thats just a coincidence lol
https://liquipedia.net/valorant/Mun -> this is their coach who actually is named mun
Some of y'all sound like dumbasses thinking that CR is a shit team for losing against SEN in a fucking ranked game 4 v 5 lmao. CR was playing with their coach, and without their star player Munchkin, so it was basically a 4 v 4. 100T lost a lot of ranked games, but are people like "these randoms are better than 100T??? 100T WASHED??!?!?!"
There's also another belief that CR is bad because of scrim results. Scrimbucks don't mean a lot. There are a lot of teams with great scrim results but couldn't make up for it in the real game, or teams with bad scrim results but come out banging in their games. Hell G2, the team that Mixwell plays for, was pretty hyped in scrims, but they looked disjointed as hell in games.
Let's just see how CR does against V1 without having a kneejerk reaction about them losing a ranked game. Losing a ranked game is no big deal. Both CR and SEN are playing ranked in another region other than their own. Nothing to gauge from that.
You do realize that this logic applies to NA as Sentinels won everything after a week of preparation with a new player (TenZ). So ig the whole NA region is very weak since this team is able to dominate with a new player with low preparation. And the player swap was even more significant for Sentinels, sinatraa and TenZ dont play similar roles or agents.
Not sure about this example. TenZ and SEN would be a different case. Imagine TenZ replacing Jamppi in Liquid. Fairness in mind, would you say that Liquid wouldn't get even better and destroy more teams? SEN was already Top 1 team in NA, they lost Masters 1 because Shahz' father passed away and they didn't practice as a team in 2 whole weeks prior to the matches. So, its pretty understandable that they lost (and it was a very very close game like13-11 in all 3 matches against 100T)
Munchkin is a really good player. but V1 pull through, even if it looks a little shaky. I trust that they will feel a little more confident going into the future games with some time on the stage, and I believe they have a day or two until their next match so I think they'll be fine.
Edit: Scratch that, they're playing Liquid tomorrow. I think Liquid will beat V1 in the state that they're in right now. Still, they have a chance at a lower bracket run.