MITCH DIFF
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.03 0.88 1.12 | 223 199 239 | 15 5 10 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 2 5 | -1 -1 0 | 75% 63% 83% | 144 134 150 | 15% 7% 23% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.97 1.00 0.95 | 210 252 183 | 12 6 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 6 2 4 | -3 0 -3 | 60% 88% 42% | 148 182 125 | 13% 15% 13% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.91 0.83 0.96 | 212 279 167 | 14 7 7 | / 16 7 9 / | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 | 60% 63% 58% | 141 180 115 | 32% 35% 29% | 4 3 1 | 3 1 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.65 0.56 0.71 | 117 51 162 | 7 1 6 | / 15 5 10 / | 5 3 2 | -8 -4 -4 | 75% 88% 67% | 82 41 110 | 20% 0% 29% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.41 0.51 0.35 | 86 76 94 | 5 2 3 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 2 1 | -10 -3 -7 | 45% 50% 42% | 60 49 67 | 20% 17% 21% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.76 1.06 | 281 341 192 | 19 14 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 9 7 2 | +6 +6 0 | 80% 83% 75% | 182 227 115 | 24% 22% 29% | 4 4 0 | 1 0 1 | +3 +4 -1 | |
|
1.36 1.70 0.87 | 240 307 140 | 21 16 5 | / 11 6 5 / | 3 2 1 | +10 +10 0 | 85% 92% 75% | 146 192 75 | 37% 43% 23% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.24 0.92 1.73 | 198 121 316 | 13 4 9 | / 9 5 4 / | 12 8 4 | +4 -1 +5 | 90% 92% 88% | 118 75 183 | 19% 36% 12% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.19 1.16 1.23 | 213 216 209 | 15 10 5 | / 10 6 4 / | 4 2 2 | +5 +4 +1 | 80% 83% 75% | 143 136 152 | 29% 28% 30% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.65 1.45 | 146 130 171 | 9 4 5 | / 10 7 3 / | 8 6 2 | -1 -3 +2 | 85% 92% 75% | 119 105 139 | 23% 21% 26% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 1.57 1.54 | 328 335 282 | 58 38 20 | / 32 19 13 / | 12 6 6 | +26 +19 +7 | 73% 81% 60% | 192 209 164 | 23% 25% 20% | 13 10 3 | 7 6 1 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
1.16 1.05 1.11 | 210 205 223 | 40 24 16 | / 31 16 15 / | 12 4 8 | +9 +8 +1 | 77% 72% 85% | 127 125 130 | 13% 10% 19% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.11 1.07 1.09 | 181 162 201 | 31 19 12 | / 28 14 14 / | 21 11 10 | +3 +5 -2 | 83% 84% 80% | 115 107 128 | 17% 15% 20% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.95 1.06 0.99 | 213 224 190 | 37 22 15 | / 38 24 14 / | 19 15 4 | -1 -2 +1 | 77% 84% 65% | 139 154 117 | 28% 29% 27% | 8 6 2 | 3 1 2 | +5 +5 0 | |
|
1.01 0.50 0.81 | 160 176 132 | 29 22 7 | / 33 17 16 / | 18 12 6 | -4 +5 -9 | 71% 78% 60% | 96 98 93 | 17% 15% 18% | 2 1 1 | 5 2 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 0.89 1.05 | 211 287 177 | 37 20 17 | / 42 16 26 / | 22 8 14 | -5 +4 -9 | 65% 75% 59% | 135 185 104 | 31% 27% 35% | 7 5 2 | 6 0 6 | +1 +5 -4 | |
|
0.95 0.98 0.97 | 204 193 214 | 36 15 21 | / 38 14 24 / | 8 4 4 | -2 +1 -3 | 73% 80% 69% | 139 125 147 | 26% 16% 35% | 5 0 5 | 3 2 1 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.03 0.81 0.88 | 186 197 180 | 35 16 19 | / 38 14 24 / | 8 3 5 | -3 +2 -5 | 65% 80% 56% | 123 128 119 | 29% 39% 23% | 3 2 1 | 6 2 4 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.82 0.76 0.79 | 164 159 174 | 28 10 18 | / 39 13 26 / | 16 8 8 | -11 -3 -8 | 67% 75% 63% | 103 99 105 | 24% 32% 19% | 3 0 3 | 5 2 3 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.84 0.77 0.79 | 163 185 148 | 26 11 15 | / 38 14 24 / | 13 9 4 | -12 -3 -9 | 63% 80% 53% | 121 131 114 | 21% 21% 20% | 3 2 1 | 11 5 6 | -8 -3 -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 1.54 1.13 | 294 296 289 | 20 16 4 | / 10 6 4 / | 7 2 5 | +10 +10 0 | 94% 92% 100% | 172 162 196 | 15% 15% 15% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.36 1.30 1.51 | 224 208 266 | 15 9 6 | / 6 4 2 / | 1 1 0 | +9 +5 +4 | 82% 75% 100% | 117 121 108 | 9% 8% 13% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.36 1.14 1.90 | 270 256 304 | 16 10 6 | / 10 7 3 / | 5 3 2 | +6 +3 +3 | 71% 67% 80% | 162 152 184 | 37% 36% 38% | 7 6 1 | 4 3 1 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.36 1.27 1.58 | 225 205 276 | 14 10 4 | / 8 5 3 / | 10 6 4 | +6 +5 +1 | 88% 83% 100% | 141 129 169 | 15% 19% 6% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.60 0.65 0.48 | 155 163 137 | 8 5 3 | / 14 10 4 / | 6 6 0 | -6 -5 -1 | 76% 83% 60% | 112 122 88 | 36% 36% 38% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 0.55 1.30 | 234 155 268 | 14 3 11 | / 14 5 9 / | 3 2 1 | 0 -2 +2 | 76% 80% 75% | 161 105 184 | 25% 4% 38% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.05 0.88 1.12 | 233 265 220 | 12 5 7 | / 16 5 11 / | 12 1 11 | -4 0 -4 | 71% 80% 67% | 130 153 120 | 52% 56% 50% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.76 0.96 0.68 | 166 203 152 | 9 3 6 | / 14 4 10 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -1 -4 | 53% 60% 50% | 117 138 108 | 16% 16% 15% | 1 1 0 | 6 2 4 | -5 -1 -4 | |
|
0.67 1.02 0.52 | 183 283 142 | 10 5 5 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 0 2 | -5 0 -5 | 53% 60% 50% | 111 172 86 | 30% 35% 25% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.24 0.04 0.32 | 67 23 86 | 3 0 3 | / 14 5 9 / | 1 0 1 | -11 -5 -6 | 47% 80% 33% | 52 23 64 | 13% 0% 17% | 0 0 0 | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.50 2.25 3.51 | 504 471 641 | 30 22 8 | / 7 6 1 / | 1 1 0 | +23 +16 +7 | 93% 92% 100% | 285 284 287 | 24% 25% 22% | 4 3 1 | 2 2 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.56 1.34 2.43 | 273 248 371 | 15 10 5 | / 8 7 1 / | 9 8 1 | +7 +3 +4 | 100% 100% 100% | 169 168 173 | 20% 21% 19% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.39 1.32 1.65 | 201 194 230 | 10 8 2 | / 5 4 1 / | 6 2 4 | +5 +4 +1 | 87% 83% 100% | 129 129 133 | 18% 14% 40% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.95 1.20 0.02 | 182 207 87 | 10 10 0 | / 9 6 3 / | 4 1 3 | +1 +4 -3 | 73% 75% 67% | 116 124 87 | 15% 15% 14% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.65 0.80 0.05 | 101 121 22 | 4 4 0 | / 8 6 2 / | 8 8 0 | -4 -2 -2 | 80% 83% 67% | 57 66 22 | 20% 17% 50% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.98 0.01 1.27 | 250 45 302 | 11 0 11 | / 13 3 10 / | 4 1 3 | -2 -3 +1 | 60% 33% 67% | 172 45 204 | 27% 50% 26% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.60 1.40 0.40 | 178 375 129 | 8 4 4 | / 14 3 11 / | 1 0 1 | -6 +1 -7 | 47% 67% 42% | 128 225 103 | 21% 33% 16% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.56 0.78 0.51 | 164 165 164 | 7 2 5 | / 14 3 11 / | 1 0 1 | -7 -1 -6 | 60% 67% 58% | 109 110 108 | 25% 13% 33% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.47 0.09 0.56 | 120 109 123 | 6 1 5 | / 13 3 10 / | 1 0 1 | -7 -2 -5 | 40% 33% 42% | 79 67 82 | 22% 17% 24% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.30 0.08 0.36 | 110 109 111 | 5 1 4 | / 15 3 12 / | 2 0 2 | -10 -2 -8 | 53% 33% 58% | 72 76 72 | 25% 17% 29% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 |
rishu004 [#3]we will know which team has the best korean lol
That doesn't give any of us any clue which team is going to win.
WokWay [#13]That doesn't give any of us any clue which team is going to win.
then you dont know LMAO
Delusional_Mitch_Fan [#2]C9 2-0 I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
WE HECKIN LOVE MITCH
KyLZi [#12]Xset v Guard best matchup imo.
after the match, i didnt like how it felt so one sided towards the guard
unknown_trash [#27]after the match, i didnt like how it felt so one sided towards the guard
true. I was wrong.
thatpower [#30]is this going to be a serious match or troll comps?
Wait why would there be troll comps?
S0v4k [#31]Wait why would there be troll comps?
both teams basically qualified and there were hints from vanity and mce that there was gonna be some wacky comps
KyLZi [#10]Major upset potential.
I agree, C9 are some serious underdogs never to be taken lightly even when playing the incredible favorites of THE GUARD.
SaltyWaffIe [#34]I agree, C9 are some serious underdogs never to be taken lightly even when playing the incredible favorites of THE GUARD.
underdogs??u hella trippin bro
SaltyWaffIe [#34]I agree, C9 are some serious underdogs never to be taken lightly even when playing the incredible favorites of THE GUARD.
Since when are Cloud9 underdogs π
unknown_trash [#62]AAAAHHH i love both teams i cant choose who i want to win, i want both to go masters NOOOO
There's 2 slots bro chill
unknown_trash [#62]AAAAHHH i love both teams i cant choose who i want to win, i want both to go masters NOOOO
I feel you man
These probably my 2 favorite teams
bala [#60]2-1 Cloud 9. Leaf goes crazy + xeta sova diffs trent.
Nah xeta won't diff trent, but leaf and xeppa + vanity strats are sure to carry here. As a big guard fan, I think they still need more time before they're quite C9's level.
aceofrainbows [#61]without the new patch, I'd put c9 and the guard at almost the same level, but since c9 has actual practice running comps without astra and viper already I'll say they're my pick
Also I think Vanity always has the best read on the meta so another reason why c9 is probably going to win but guard is still crazy. I just don't want this guard run to be like Fazeβs run last year.
HershieBoi [#78]tbh I also think they are overrated, but they are still incredible team top 5 for sure. My only problem is that they are a new team and I really don't want them to turn out like Faze from last year's stage 1. The Guard seem to be on a hot run right now and hopefully, they don't drop it.
Faze did a good run last year only cause they had the mighty strat call "Press W" and caught everyone off guard.
The Guard actually has chemistry, strat, aim and overall good executions, i don't think they end up like FaZe tbh.
Hecking_Love_Tenz [#54]I think C9 is the best team in NA rn so 2-1 for C9
I love when sen fans not being toxic, appreciate other teams . Love you bro .
Fire737 [#97]C9 eats guard and destroys trent and his tier 10 team
100T supporter detected opinion rejected :)
1lham [#100]100T supporter detected opinion rejected :)
1 month old team Guard bandwagoner glory rider detected
Opinion in the dustbin
kudos [#106]Match of the year right here ladies and gentlemen so make sure to get your dishes done, laundry washed and strap yourself in because it's going to be one hell of a wild ride!
C9 FTW 2-1
Pain Im going out tonight :( people will tell you touch grass and the. You miss games like this
Fire737 [#103]1 month old team Guard bandwagoner glory rider detected
Opinion in the dustbin
1 month old team can outperform a team thats been in the competition scene for more than 1 year.
Lol you crybaby prolly couldnt sleep for days after losing 13-0. Typical 100L fan
zardinez [#72]Nah xeta won't diff trent, but leaf and xeppa + vanity strats are sure to carry here. As a big guard fan, I think they still need more time before they're quite C9's level.
xeta meta!
namelessv2 [#136]Seeding match so whoever loses is just gonna have people saying they didnt try so this game dosent matter at all
new comp test game
Marqin [#158]Which Patch is this? Composition suggests 4.04, and Analysts talk about "new meta", but VLR says it's the old 4.02?
4.04 definitely
onlyfax [#161]This loss should probably help the guard for their playoffs run. And the meta change seems to be somewhat affecting them
I agree, if they lose it will really test if they are capable of being a consistent top team
justron40 [#138]it's time to leave my accurate prediction.
C9 2-1 Guard
what did i tell yall?
i'm very happy if guard win it but i think c9 is too much for them.
lysenkerr [#147]C9 washed in new meta in the face of fundamentals monsters, unlucky really.
NEVERMIND, I'M WASHED AND THE GUARD IS WASHED IN NEW META IN THE FACE OF FUNDAMENTALS MONSTERS (C9), UNLUCKY REALLY.
lysenkerr [#165]C9 Vanity: Hello C9 Leaf
C9 Leaf: Hello C9 Vanity, what can I do for you?
C9 Vanity: go kill
C9 Leaf: say no more
top 3 igl for sure
Delusional_Mitch_Fan [#2]C9 2-0 I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
BatChest
lysenkerr [#171]30-7. in 15 rounds. I genuinely do not remember such a dominant performance from a single player in a top game. Anyone can help me out? It actually might have been leaf as well some time ago.
Edit: the fact that vanity had 5 & 4 kills on two separate maps makes it even funnier.
at least he top fragged one lmao
wewZ [#176]at least he top fragged one lmao
Actually makes it even better that my man goes 60ADR on two maps but them straight up MVPs the remaining one LOL
1lham [#124]1 month old team can outperform a team thats been in the competition scene for more than 1 year.
Lol you crybaby prolly couldnt sleep for days after losing 13-0. Typical 100L fan
Lmao
1lham [#124]1 month old team can outperform a team thats been in the competition scene for more than 1 year.
Lol you crybaby prolly couldnt sleep for days after losing 13-0. Typical 100L fan
Your team will be irrelevant in about 2 months or less
Donβt forget to jump on the next bandwagon bitch
1lham [#124]1 month old team can outperform a team thats been in the competition scene for more than 1 year.
Lol you crybaby prolly couldnt sleep for days after losing 13-0. Typical 100L fan
Lmao your team got 13-4d and 13-2d
Cry π