my tierlist
abit too harsh on some teams but this shit isn't about emotion, if your shit your shit
Is this bait? If not here are my arguments:
Ok 1st of all, who allowed prx into S tier. They good, no doubt. But them leading towards a more patient meta playstyle ain't it. Prx are a team where you think about them pulling out pretty buff neon and yoru into breeze with solo astra. Not playing default-y comps. Let them go full Joker arc and maybe S.
Loud and MIBR in A is outrageous. Loud is gonna be a worse team then before with a missing igl and a team of bunch of rough edges that need a aspas. Mibr have aspas, but what else. They'll be good considering they have the best player in the world but cmon.
I also think NRG could deserve S. The locked in newbies and a shooting FNS are too powerful.
Drx deserves better. They've beaten out the best of the best consistently and their only adding more to their star roster with former Korean superstars. Your not giving them enough credit.
BLG and EDG in D is honestly just rage bait
Give Nongshim red force a chance- I think they can actually upset.
your ranking practically all these teams as if off-season actually matters, like edg d tier and dfm s tier, off-season events don't matter.
In your other responses you also talk about how the history of the team matters and thats why u ranked Loud in A tier but then you put teams like edg in d and dfm in s????
lev hasn't even played since last year and they lost their best player and yet you say they are the best team in the world? They were around 5-6th last year and they have downgraded and you are putting that at 1.
Assuming off season events matter like you think, trace and drx are doing better than rrq so shouldn't they be higher, you put drx and trace in b and rrq in s?? Even if you go off past results, drx and trace would still be higher.
There are so many inconsistencies with your logic that it must either be you applying your logic incorrectly, you just going off gut and so you are not ranking them objectively or you are just heavily biased.
Another example of this bias is with t1 and g2, t1 is A and g2 Is S and yet T1 has played better so far in the off season, this is assuming off season matters like you think. And so obviously you are adding an element of past results into your ranking as well as otherwise t1 would be higher than G2 but yet you do the exact opposite in other situations like with rrq compared with drx and trace.
There are many many more instances of this but these examples should be enough