https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime <---- reaction time test
also mention your monitors refresh rate, thanks
https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime <---- reaction time test
also mention your monitors refresh rate, thanks
190 - 220 ms, 90% of the time its 210ms. Immortal 50rr , yea i haven't played in a week, yea i bottom frag 50% of my games, yea i'm a rat, yea i play almost the same if i go on a smurf, yea i wonder every day if i could be radiant if my reaction time was better but at least im better than 95% of people in this game and thats a fact. 240hz
i was plat - diamond 1 with 144hz a few months ago but idk if it was 240hz that boosted me but i did play a lot more when i got 240hz
edit: bruh im seeing 180ms and gold 3 like bro.. wtf how are you not radiant already
Anyone younger than 40 who says they are held back by their reaction time from hitting immo/radiant are coping with their own lack of practice.
Reaction time comes into play two times when aiming - the time it takes to realize that your crosshair is not on target and the time it takes to correct a microflick after making a big flick.
So it is a very small part of how many shots you can consistently hit.
Perfect crosshair placement and good reads on enemy are the deciding factor.
For pros it might have some small impact but u can still overcome it. Look at s1mple
while it does matter to have good/decent reaction time, it's not all about it
there's timing and aim involved in it, if hypothetically this one player is always right at where to aim and never or rarely ever has to flick, theres little to no reaction time involved aside from recognizing a target in front of you and shooting it.
Take nAts for instance, man is lurking like a 5head most of the time and catches a lotta enemies from the back. Does it involve reaction time? Well, yeah but not quite.