sen 2-1 mith
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.76 1.82 1.67 | 297 325 249 | 23 15 8 | / 9 7 2 / | 4 4 0 | +14 +8 +6 | 89% 83% 100% | 190 206 164 | 47% 43% 53% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.41 1.48 1.30 | 276 297 242 | 18 12 6 | / 11 7 4 / | 5 2 3 | +7 +5 +2 | 89% 83% 100% | 200 210 182 | 28% 34% 16% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.25 0.64 2.29 | 258 136 468 | 18 6 12 | / 13 9 4 / | 4 3 1 | +5 -3 +8 | 63% 58% 71% | 155 91 266 | 17% 19% 14% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.95 1.13 0.63 | 163 220 66 | 12 11 1 | / 11 8 3 / | 7 2 5 | +1 +3 -2 | 84% 92% 71% | 105 143 40 | 38% 45% 17% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.58 0.15 1.32 | 111 63 194 | 7 1 6 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 3 1 | -5 -8 +3 | 74% 67% 86% | 89 50 155 | 25% 8% 42% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.30 0.91 1.53 | 267 240 283 | 19 6 13 | / 15 7 8 / | 1 1 0 | +4 -1 +5 | 63% 71% 58% | 164 145 174 | 49% 55% 46% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.67 0.94 | 165 135 184 | 9 3 6 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 2 4 | -5 -3 -2 | 63% 57% 67% | 127 101 143 | 32% 67% 20% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.78 0.63 0.86 | 139 112 156 | 9 3 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 1 3 | -6 -4 -2 | 53% 57% 50% | 104 91 111 | 42% 38% 44% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.60 0.41 0.72 | 178 126 209 | 11 3 8 | / 18 6 12 / | 5 0 5 | -7 -3 -4 | 58% 43% 67% | 124 74 153 | 29% 33% 29% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.42 0.02 0.71 | 127 55 170 | 8 1 7 | / 16 7 9 / | 3 1 2 | -8 -6 -2 | 42% 14% 58% | 81 31 111 | 25% 33% 24% | 0 0 0 | 6 4 2 | -6 -4 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.19 1.13 | 228 209 236 | 61 31 30 | / 52 29 23 / | 25 15 10 | +9 +2 +7 | 76% 75% 76% | 137 128 147 | 35% 38% 33% | 10 5 5 | 4 2 2 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.33 0.83 1.10 | 191 250 144 | 51 36 15 | / 47 27 20 / | 36 21 15 | +4 +9 -5 | 81% 88% 74% | 132 165 93 | 24% 27% 18% | 5 2 3 | 6 2 4 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.86 0.82 0.84 | 194 210 168 | 47 28 19 | / 55 31 24 / | 14 7 7 | -8 -3 -5 | 66% 68% 65% | 135 153 113 | 23% 27% 18% | 6 4 2 | 8 4 4 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.74 0.91 0.82 | 190 179 195 | 47 25 22 | / 56 32 24 / | 14 9 5 | -9 -7 -2 | 57% 55% 59% | 117 109 126 | 14% 13% 16% | 12 5 7 | 15 11 4 | -3 -6 +3 | |
|
0.59 1.04 0.80 | 175 138 220 | 45 19 26 | / 53 30 23 / | 23 12 11 | -8 -11 +3 | 72% 73% 71% | 114 88 145 | 28% 22% 32% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.16 1.26 | 233 248 226 | 65 33 32 | / 50 22 28 / | 20 9 11 | +15 +11 +4 | 74% 79% 70% | 164 164 164 | 41% 50% 35% | 7 3 4 | 5 4 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
1.07 1.38 1.24 | 234 196 263 | 64 26 38 | / 48 22 26 / | 6 1 5 | +16 +4 +12 | 73% 74% 73% | 143 114 168 | 35% 35% 35% | 10 6 4 | 4 1 3 | +6 +5 +1 | |
|
0.95 0.95 0.95 | 189 166 200 | 46 20 26 | / 48 21 27 / | 25 9 16 | -2 -1 -1 | 69% 71% 68% | 127 116 136 | 26% 25% 27% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.95 0.77 0.85 | 158 176 152 | 40 19 21 | / 51 23 28 / | 27 19 8 | -11 -4 -7 | 68% 76% 60% | 109 114 105 | 36% 46% 29% | 5 1 4 | 4 0 4 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.61 1.04 0.83 | 184 149 227 | 47 15 32 | / 54 24 30 / | 13 5 8 | -7 -9 +2 | 61% 44% 75% | 130 103 153 | 28% 28% 27% | 10 4 6 | 21 13 8 | -11 -9 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 1.10 1.12 | 264 243 288 | 22 12 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +3 +1 | 70% 83% 55% | 170 149 193 | 33% 24% 42% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.94 1.09 0.77 | 191 195 188 | 16 9 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 10 7 3 | -2 +1 -3 | 74% 83% 64% | 110 108 112 | 34% 29% 40% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.82 1.14 0.47 | 155 195 113 | 10 7 3 | / 16 7 9 / | 16 10 6 | -6 0 -6 | 70% 75% 64% | 101 127 73 | 21% 23% 15% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.65 0.79 0.50 | 131 188 71 | 10 7 3 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 3 1 | -8 -3 -5 | 57% 50% 64% | 85 118 49 | 10% 8% 13% | 2 2 0 | 4 4 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.20 0.23 0.17 | 111 126 96 | 8 5 3 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 2 1 | -14 -6 -8 | 39% 42% 36% | 77 99 54 | 14% 21% 6% | 2 1 1 | 6 3 3 | -4 -2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.58 1.88 1.29 | 286 332 244 | 24 14 10 | / 14 6 8 / | 7 3 4 | +10 +8 +2 | 83% 100% 67% | 194 222 168 | 42% 52% 32% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.41 1.54 1.28 | 263 279 249 | 22 12 10 | / 13 5 8 / | 8 3 5 | +9 +7 +2 | 78% 91% 67% | 177 179 176 | 27% 16% 41% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.31 1.32 1.29 | 202 177 225 | 18 9 9 | / 11 4 7 / | 2 0 2 | +7 +5 +2 | 74% 73% 75% | 126 114 137 | 28% 28% 28% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.01 0.80 1.20 | 206 158 251 | 17 6 11 | / 15 6 9 / | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | 74% 73% 75% | 134 115 152 | 26% 33% 21% | 7 3 4 | 5 3 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.87 1.16 0.62 | 143 182 109 | 11 6 5 | / 13 5 8 / | 11 10 1 | -2 +1 -3 | 74% 100% 50% | 100 123 79 | 46% 56% 33% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 1.61 1.16 | 256 314 200 | 29 18 11 | / 20 12 8 / | 13 9 4 | +9 +6 +3 | 88% 94% 81% | 170 210 130 | 22% 23% 19% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.95 0.86 1.05 | 196 207 185 | 21 11 10 | / 22 13 9 / | 6 3 3 | -1 -2 +1 | 72% 75% 69% | 137 150 124 | 23% 22% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.90 0.53 1.27 | 197 133 262 | 22 7 15 | / 25 14 11 / | 11 4 7 | -3 -7 +4 | 69% 63% 75% | 124 84 165 | 28% 39% 24% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.70 0.53 0.86 | 149 116 184 | 16 6 10 | / 23 12 11 / | 14 6 8 | -7 -6 -1 | 72% 69% 75% | 89 70 108 | 23% 29% 19% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.69 0.77 0.60 | 182 206 160 | 19 12 7 | / 25 13 12 / | 6 3 3 | -6 -1 -5 | 53% 56% 50% | 117 116 118 | 15% 12% 18% | 6 2 4 | 10 6 4 | -4 -4 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 1.45 1.39 | 234 244 226 | 30 16 14 | / 18 10 8 / | 8 6 2 | +12 +6 +6 | 78% 81% 75% | 167 164 169 | 47% 52% 43% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.15 0.97 1.34 | 233 190 276 | 27 11 16 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 0 3 | +5 0 +5 | 78% 75% 81% | 142 99 186 | 31% 30% 32% | 6 5 1 | 1 0 1 | +5 +5 0 | |
|
0.95 0.74 1.16 | 218 184 252 | 22 8 14 | / 23 11 12 / | 8 4 4 | -1 -3 +2 | 63% 38% 88% | 156 127 185 | 29% 26% 33% | 3 1 2 | 10 6 4 | -7 -5 -2 | |
|
0.88 0.95 0.82 | 191 200 183 | 20 10 10 | / 23 11 12 / | 12 8 4 | -3 -1 -2 | 72% 69% 75% | 118 117 119 | 28% 41% 23% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.69 0.66 0.72 | 139 102 177 | 15 5 10 | / 21 10 11 / | 11 4 7 | -6 -5 -1 | 66% 63% 69% | 91 80 102 | 22% 23% 21% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
Conclusion: Who Would Likely Win?
Sentinels would be the favorites in this matchup. While MiTH is a talented and strong team within Southeast Asia, Sentinels’ experience, individual skill, and tactical depth would likely allow them to come out on top in a BO3 series.
Why Sentinels Wins:
Experience & Consistency: Sentinels have been battle-tested at the highest levels of competition, while MiTH is still working to solidify its place on the international stage.
Team Coordination: Sentinels’ strong communication and deep map knowledge give them an edge in a tactical shooter like Valorant.
Individual Skill: Sentinels have multiple players capable of carrying games in key moments, and their individual prowess often makes the difference.
draxiii_qt [#11]Conclusion: Who Would Likely Win?
Sentinels would be the favorites in this matchup. While MiTH is a talented and strong team within Southeast Asia, Sentinels’ experience, individual skill, and tactical depth would likely allow them to come out on top in a BO3 series.
Why Sentinels Wins:Experience & Consistency: Sentinels have been battle-tested at the highest levels of competition, while MiTH is still working to solidify its place on the international stage.
Team Coordination: Sentinels’ strong communication and deep map knowledge give them an edge in a tactical shooter like Valorant.
Individual Skill: Sentinels have multiple players capable of carrying games in key moments, and their individual prowess often makes the difference.
get a job bro
HIMNOTHER [#15]It will not even close
Since when do 90% of VLR users think a Tier 2 team will beat a Masters winner. Not even close
PP12123213123 [#16]Since when do 90% of VLR users think a Tier 2 team will beat a Masters winner. Not even close
Feel good to met other north korean pal
draxiii_qt [#11]Conclusion: Who Would Likely Win?
Sentinels would be the favorites in this matchup. While MiTH is a talented and strong team within Southeast Asia, Sentinels’ experience, individual skill, and tactical depth would likely allow them to come out on top in a BO3 series.
Why Sentinels Wins:Experience & Consistency: Sentinels have been battle-tested at the highest levels of competition, while MiTH is still working to solidify its place on the international stage.
Team Coordination: Sentinels’ strong communication and deep map knowledge give them an edge in a tactical shooter like Valorant.
Individual Skill: Sentinels have multiple players capable of carrying games in key moments, and their individual prowess often makes the difference.
Chat gpt ahh comment
draxiii_qt [#11]Conclusion: Who Would Likely Win?
Sentinels would be the favorites in this matchup. While MiTH is a talented and strong team within Southeast Asia, Sentinels’ experience, individual skill, and tactical depth would likely allow them to come out on top in a BO3 series.
Why Sentinels Wins:Experience & Consistency: Sentinels have been battle-tested at the highest levels of competition, while MiTH is still working to solidify its place on the international stage.
Team Coordination: Sentinels’ strong communication and deep map knowledge give them an edge in a tactical shooter like Valorant.
Individual Skill: Sentinels have multiple players capable of carrying games in key moments, and their individual prowess often makes the difference.
everyone shout out chat gpt
highlyte [#33]Isn't it too early?
pretty sure there's 3 matches today so they probably want to try and finish at around the same time
gutterslugs [#53]who else wishing talon would make a full thai roster again and get two players from MITH 🙏🙏
thai*
gutterslugs [#53]who else wishing talon would make a full thai roster again and get two players from MITH 🙏🙏
taiwannese💀
cameran [#24]yea unfortunately cgrs has a dogshit team like primmie
imagine dogshit Pacific team beating top NA team
draxiii_qt [#11]Conclusion: Who Would Likely Win?
Sentinels would be the favorites in this matchup. While MiTH is a talented and strong team within Southeast Asia, Sentinels’ experience, individual skill, and tactical depth would likely allow them to come out on top in a BO3 series.
Why Sentinels Wins:Experience & Consistency: Sentinels have been battle-tested at the highest levels of competition, while MiTH is still working to solidify its place on the international stage.
Team Coordination: Sentinels’ strong communication and deep map knowledge give them an edge in a tactical shooter like Valorant.
Individual Skill: Sentinels have multiple players capable of carrying games in key moments, and their individual prowess often makes the difference.
Ok 🗿
Sk4d1_ [#102]imagine getting paid 20k+ salary to lose to <5k salary lol
Wages are different in NA compared to asia bro. Like cost of living in NA is like 5x more
Bhrubby [#109]Wages are different in NA compared to asia bro. Like cost of living in NA is like 5x more
still make more than 5x amount of apac salaries. masters winner losing to a team that dont even make ascension btw
Master_Tomato99 [#99]imagine dogshit Pacific team beating top NA team
sen arent a top team lol, like top 6 in the world maybe
PP12123213123 [#16]Since when do 90% of VLR users think a Tier 2 team will beat a Masters winner. Not even close
Lol
Coolkas [#106]Talon is not bad, just MITH too good!
Ye I think so . they played very well in this tournament
Bhrubby [#109]Wages are different in NA compared to asia bro. Like cost of living in NA is like 5x more
salary in Thailand can’t make u living normal if u r workers unlike NA
SekkenIsSoapp [#22]SEN 2 - 1 MITH
Sen 13-7 MITH (Pearl)
Sen 10-13 MITH (Haven)
Sen 13-5 MITH (Split)Zekken is gonna have a better game this time but cgrs my king will frag
Bro tried to cook
cameran [#115]sen arent a top team lol, like top 6 in the world maybe
top 6 in the world IS a top team dumbass
draxiii_qt [#11]Conclusion: Who Would Likely Win?
Sentinels would be the favorites in this matchup. While MiTH is a talented and strong team within Southeast Asia, Sentinels’ experience, individual skill, and tactical depth would likely allow them to come out on top in a BO3 series.
Why Sentinels Wins:Experience & Consistency: Sentinels have been battle-tested at the highest levels of competition, while MiTH is still working to solidify its place on the international stage.
Team Coordination: Sentinels’ strong communication and deep map knowledge give them an edge in a tactical shooter like Valorant.
Individual Skill: Sentinels have multiple players capable of carrying games in key moments, and their individual prowess often makes the difference.
job karle howle...kali type karne ara bus
Zod707 [#138]top 6 in the world IS a top team dumbass
it infact is not. 33 teams last year, top 6 is like 20%
Need to be like at least 10% to be considered top
cameran [#149]it infact is not. 33 teams last year, top 6 is like 20%
Need to be like at least 10% to be considered top
33?