I wanted to elaborate on a few points because while they are good examples, they lack some context. Regarding the Uyghurs in China, I don’t think the situation compares directly to France, Poland, or other examples. There’s a consistent theme of the Chinese government targeting anyone who disagrees with the CCP's ideology, rather than specifically targeting the Uyghurs for extermination or imprisonment. While this doesn’t make the situation better, it’s an important distinction to recognize.
Now, about France's recent election: they made a commendable decision by collaborating with the second and third biggest parties to prevent Marine Le Pen of the National Rally (formerly known as the National Front) from gaining a majority. Macron and other parties agreed to step down in districts where they were unlikely to win and vice versa. I believe that if she had been in power, her policies would have been significantly harsher on immigrants compared to Macron and others.
On the topic of burkinis, your assertion that "France banned them" is factually incorrect. The bans in Cannes, Nice, and Sisco were local government decisions, which were later challenged and repealed by courts for violating civil liberties, including freedom of movement and religious freedom. This outcome should be viewed positively because it illustrates that legal safeguards were effective against overreach by local governments. It doesn’t indicate a deep-rooted Islamophobia in France; rather, it reflects poor decisions by local officials that were appropriately rectified.
Regarding your claim that the AfD is the biggest far-right party in Europe, the measurement is key. The AfD has never ruled the parliament or been part of a coalition with power. In contrast, the PVV in the Netherlands has successfully formed a coalition government, which grants them much more influence. Similarly, Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy), led by Giorgia Meloni, is currently part of the ruling coalition, which also gives them more authority than a party without any seats at the table. Additionally, it’s worth noting that the AfD's leader was recently banned from standing in elections due to an embezzlement case. Many supporters seem to be more aligned with her personally than with the party itself, which could lead to a decline in the AfD's influence.
Lastly, I want to touch on the Swiss minaret ban. You provided an accurate overview, and it’s important to understand the context behind it. The controversy originated in 2005 when a local Turkish cultural association sought a permit to build a minaret on its community center. This was met with local opposition, leading to delays and claims of religious bias from the Turkish association. The initial opposition started locally but escalated to a national law that restricts religious expression. This contrasts with the situation in France, where the burkinis ban was ultimately overturned. Thank you for the discussion; I’ve learned a lot in the process!