Everyone is wrong.Unconsensual internal ejaculation was merely the starting point for the relationship between Flashback and the exposer.
Her initial claim was that when their relationship turned sour, she thought Flashback was two-timing her by meeting his ex-girlfriend. Flashback himself said it was a misunderstanding and not two-timing, but his girlfriend did not believe him.
She then said that she would expose Flashback's two-timing after the semi-finals. Although Flashback apologised, she felt that his attitude was insincere and demanded an apology for that as well.
Initially, this was all she revealed, but as the timeline progressed, it gradually morphed into a story of agenda rape of a minor. Furthermore, these details were lost in translation, and various texts were circulated that focused on words like "victim" and "vaginal semen shot".
When I read all the materials and all the posts in the case in Korean, there was no real wrongdoing. After the non-consensual vaginal penetration, they were in a relationship to take responsibility for themselves, and after that they just misbehaved with each other.
From the beginning, the focus wasn't on the rape. Not only did the rape not happen, but this issue is at the very front of this whole series of timelines. It can't be the focus now.
If it was a real rape, then this whole sequence of them becoming a couple, dating for a short time and breaking up is the part that doesn't make sense. Her remaining a DRX fan, her being invited to the VCT stadium, it all contradicts itself.