0

Is NA unironically the worst region?

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
sliceddice

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#2
Dolphin
1
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only

#65
ItsHunter
0
Frags
+

tbf it was rlly unfortunate circumstances for NA and even Americas as a whole. Id say theyre by far the most competitive region and most of their teams are better than most of the EMEA and Pacific teams however, Loud got 2nd place curse (ngl at this point its gotta be real), and Cloud 9 were p much equal to NRG and they werent able to make it over loud. So lets say loud did as good as they did in Americas we'd probably see Americas have 3 teams in the top 4.
Pacific is also in a rut rn considering DRX are falling off hard (probably internal issues). PRX are also an insane team but without Something they clearly werent able to change their style enough to make GF.
Both of these factors paralleled by the fact that EMEA literally had no issues outside of Navi being too used to trolling their games and still having the tourney be more dominant in Pacific and NA just goes to show that EMEA is by far the weakest region. FUT got owned by DRX and Navi are middling at best, TL are p good but they throw in the same way gambit do and just dont have the talent to make up for it.
EMEA as much as i love navi tl and fnc are just a 1 team region for now.

#3
Jopay01
0
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#4
pugboy
7
Frags
+

Better team doesn't = better region

the more better teams = the better the region

NRG and EG made it top 4 and LOUD did just have an off tourny

#9
Zerphyr1
-22
Frags
+

agreed that's why NA is shit

#11
pugboy
18
Frags
+

bro is lost in the sauce

#14
dapada
-1
Frags
+

would you rather have 1st and 5th team or 2nd and 4th team? not that big of a difference tbh

#15
pugboy
44
Frags
+

EMEA record against NA - 5-8

EMEA record against NA - 0-8
(without fnatic)

#23
dapada
-7
Frags
+

yeah americas #1 and americas #2 beating emea #3 emea #4 is a huge achivement? lets not act like TL didnt choke their haven game

#27
renzdzn
5
Frags
+

so which team is emea #2? KC

#30
pugboy
3
Frags
+

they wouldn't have choked if they were better lmao

#32
dapada
-2
Frags
+

no one said they were better lmfao
my argument is they were pretty close against each other

just look at the placement they got
EMEA - 1st and 5th
Americas - 2nd and 4th
and yall acting like americas is way better, what a joke

#39
pugboy
3
Frags
+

ur dumb lmao

#45
dapada
-3
Frags
+

ah yes no argument classic braindead vlr user

#46
pugboy
0
Frags
+

I gave you an argument and you completely dismiss it you are completely lost 1 team region mfs

#53
dapada
-2
Frags
+

whatever makes you sleep at night ig

keep coping bro, we'll win more trophies KKK

#51
333triplethreat
0
Frags
+

Bro forgot navi and fut :skull emoji: x7

#52
dapada
0
Frags
+

#23 learn how to read dumbass

#40
CryoZanderDerrekEnjoyer
0
Frags
+

is this from 2023 or where did u get this stat from?

Guild FPX Liquid all have beaten NA?

#41
Manaphy
0
Frags
+

It's from 2023 I'm pretty sure.

#55
symbols07
0
Frags
+

fnatic and navi made top 4 at lock in. fnatic won the previous two tourneys, liquid finished 5-6th after a close loss to nrg. emea looks much better

#56
dapada
0
Frags
+

let them cope
one thing they beat us at xD

#61
pugboy
-1
Frags
+

Liquid would have lost to c9

#68
poweredjay
0
Frags
+

i think after tokyo we can all agree for the most part lock//in results mean nothing at this point

teams were all new
eg 9-16th lock in, 2nd tokyo
prx 1st rounded lock in, 3rd tokyo
liquid/edg first rounded lock in, 5-6th
navi 3-4th lockin, winless in tokyo

etc...

fnc is just fnc, can't argue with that
liquid choked 12-7 lead and got smoked map 3
fnc > americas > emea

#5
Metal
-3
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#6
Yistyy
-3
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#7
Nachtel
0
Frags
+

What does that make EMEA's 2-5th best teams?

#8
melodymur
0
Frags
+

NA too humble doesn't want to make a super-team like SHITMEA because they like challenges

#12
hekzy
-4
Frags
+

You can't make a superteam that's better than fnatic. You just can't, you don't have such talent. You're only lucky that Liquid isn't hitting shots as of now because we'd be seeing TL vs FNC grand finals every event.

#17
Revlo
6
Frags
+

really? cause EG made every map close and they are nowhere near a superteam. an NA superteam would wreck Lnatics shit.

#18
hekzy
-6
Frags
+

Every map close? One map andies literally only won one map. 3-0 close final? It was never close.

Come up with 5 NA players to compete against fnatic lmfao.

#19
Revlo
8
Frags
+

then shitnatic vs sentinels iceland was never close

#33
hekzy
-4
Frags
+

ok? happened 3 years ago. Still happy you beat Doma and Magnum? Fucking losers kek

Come up with 5 NA players to compete against fnatic lmfao.

#48
Revlo
0
Frags
+

where did I say I was happy dumbass? no point in even responding to you.

#64
hekzy
-1
Frags
+

You fkn r-word. I told you to come up with five players to beat current fnatic and you replied with "sentinels vs fnatic wasn't even close hehehehe🤓🤓🤓🤓".

"No point replying to you" because you're actually incapable of replying to me, as it seems.

Give me 5 players from NA that could beat fnatic and stop beating around the bush.

#49
poweredjay
1
Frags
+

yay
finesse
marved
victor
crashies

i think this roster would have a pretty good chance

#63
hekzy
-2
Frags
+

They won one fluke tournament...

#70
ItsHunter
0
Frags
+

SEN

#26
The_Cleg
-2
Frags
+

"doesn't want to make a superteam" like in 2022 where every single best player for any role from NA were in the same team. At least for FNATIC you can argue that shao sayf and nats are as good as some FNC player (or at least very close), for NA in 2022 the only real other option was Zekken for duelist, the rest of the optic team cleared any other NA player...

#72
ItsHunter
0
Frags
+

Shao > Boaster
Suygetsu > or = Alfa > Nats (currently imo)
Derke > Sayf
Leo > Zyppan
Chronice > everyone else in his role

#73
The_Cleg
0
Frags
+

You are high like wtf is the point of comparing shao with boaster? Boaster is an IGL you should compare him with ange1 or redgar.

Saying that suygestu is better than Alfa is sickening at this point of time, after Alfa was the MVP in Tokyo. But yes suygetsu might be better than nAts

#10
ole_
-2
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#13
BoF7ooM
2
Frags
+

Nearest Airport are overjoyed that finally 1 other team than Optic fluked their way into the grand finals. Waiting for the reality check to given at champs, because not a single team other than Optic has ever been in the top 4 for 2 years, and they call us a 1 team region 😹😹

#16
pandoradox
0
Frags
+

EG(?)

#20
cobalt21312
-2
Frags
+

flair

#29
GreyDaze
-2
Frags
+

Ain't no way sen flair talking

#31
duchesssx
0
Frags
+

you are from south africa it is not your region. how many wins did any team besides fnatic get against na? 1 team region.

#38
Halleluhwah
-5
Frags
+

EMEA = Europe, Middle East & Africa

#21
smb_0
-5
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#22
Scrossi
0
Frags
+

EU>NA>APAC tbh

#24
BackoxyXD
-2
Frags
+

carried by cambodia (jawgemo)

#25
Liem
-5
Frags
+

trent clears your whole bloodline

#28
The_Cleg
3
Frags
+

I don't like when obtuse NA fans call EMEA a one team region, so I can't like when somebody calls NA a bad region, even if the fans deserve it.

EMEA is definitely better than NA and it could even be better than the whole Americas (that realistically just means NA+LOUD), but this doesn't mean that NA is a bad region. It's true that their major wins are dubious, but I still think they deserve to be praised for it.

True, if FPX played in Reykjavik maybe they would've won, but maybe also not, and I don't think OpTic deserves their title taken away just for this.

I somehow think their titles are both valid (even if less than loud's or the EMEA ones) and that NA is better than any region besides EMEA and PAC (if you consider Asia as a whole, because NA clears APAC)

#34
shizuku_hajime
0
Frags
+

.

#35
TheAqif
0
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only

#36
mrGoudas
0
Frags
+

i wholeheartedly agree

#37
Liem
1
Frags
+

Okobotro 🗿

#42
Ballacks2
0
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#43
CryoZanderDerrekEnjoyer
-5
Frags
+

Very Valid take. Im not a NA hater but i just cant see a reason why NA would be better than EMEA. Dont get me wrong, EG and NRG look very good and have potential to win a(nother) LAN.

But 100T? No hope, they could maybe beat EMEA Nr 5 which is Giants.

Sentinels look good on paper but with no actual IGL and a slight language barrier & lack of chemistry i just dont see it happening. Most top teams nowadays have a core which has ideally been together since the start of the game. Sen just put a few brazilians in a former NA Masters pot and called it a day.

C9 is probably the most promising team out of all. But i think if you play C9 vs Liquid/NaVi 1000x times, Liquid/NaVi wins over 700 of the games.

My ranking currently:

  1. EG
  2. C9 (hot take?)
  3. NRG
  4. SEN
  5. 100T
    ----------------------------- (vlr keeps counting indie website)
  6. FNATIC
  7. Liquid
  8. NaVi (they will get their shit together)
  9. FUT
  10. Giants
#44
LimiNaL
0
Frags
+

C9 is only a hot take cause u didn’t put them at 1

#60
Master_oGgway
-1
Frags
+

Fnatical won and u put em in 6th bruh

#66
CryoZanderDerrekEnjoyer
0
Frags
+

thats because you cant make 2 seperate lists and vlr keeps counting as one list...

#47
yaiima0
0
Frags
+

I'm serious. Their only relevant and legit achievement is OpTic making it to Grand Finals in Champions. Outside of that, their both Reykjavik wins were dubious to say the least. Sentinels farming pros that were immortal 3 of today's standard (game was new) except for maybe Derke.

FPX didn't participate, people keep bitching about Something's absence but the whole team (best in the world at the time arguably) was absent.

Also, PRX making it to grand finals > EG making it to grand finals. So, I think even pacific has the edge over NA.

Trent flopping on LAN just shows how overrated their talent are. They are only "talents" within the framework of NA.

#50
BWF
0
Frags
+

TBH I think NA is more competitive and as a result more fun to watch, plus every tourney it's always been one good EU team

#54
symbols07
0
Frags
+

finally someone with a brain

#57
Dolphin
-1
Frags
+

Is EMEA unironically the most toxic region?

I’m serious. They’re only relevant because of calling NA, “Nearest Airport” and shitting on the AMER region,Outside of that they are Elitist to say the least. God-Complex people who cannot handle being called a 1 team region expect maybe (idk give me someone)

G2 Fans after losing their home in Europe now migrate into EU and FNATIC flair combos, missing the days of “FUCK SENTINELS”

Also, Pacific Fans usually don’t talk as much shit as NA or EMEA does. So I’m confident Pacific as the edge over EMEA.

Every time they win a LAN with a single team while the rest of their teams are in shambles shows how overconfident they are. They only think wins. And cannot bear to admit whenever they lose, and call it a fluke or dubious win

#58
CanadianLegend
-1
Frags
+

Is EMEA unironically the most toxic region?

I’m serious. They’re only relevant because of calling NA, “Nearest Airport” and shitting on the AMER region,Outside of that they are Elitist to say the least. God-Complex people who cannot handle being called a 1 team region expect maybe (idk give me someone)

G2 Fans after losing their home in Europe now migrate into EU and FNATIC flair combos, missing the days of “FUCK SENTINELS”

Also, Pacific Fans usually don’t talk as much shit as NA or EMEA does. So I’m confident Pacific as the edge over EMEA.

Every time they win a LAN with a single team while the rest of their teams are in shambles shows how overconfident they are. They only think wins. And cannot bear to admit whenever they lose, and call it a fluke or dubious win

#62
Kryomeister
0
Frags
+

Americas>EMEA>APAC, every team from americas would be atleast top 6 on EMEA and APAC

#67
jaKe-y
4
Frags
+

As an America's citizen I have to admit that EMEA takes a huge shit on us. We need to gather and make a Brazilian superteam (NA doesn't have decent players) so that we can maybe win an event in the next 3 years.

#69
yawnster
1
Frags
+

Time for Loud 3.0

#71
jackb2016
-1
Frags
+

NA are a bunch of frauds only saved by putin and covid I agree

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment