enjoy retirement
your blind devotion is a reflection of a lot of things wrong with people
they didnt just kick verno, they insinuated to the world he lacks work ethic and cant comm, even when that wasnt the case on a previous team
when the community started hating on verno the veterans ethan and fns were silent, literally did nothing to stand up for their former teammate or help him get another chance somewhere else
you are deluded and dont know when to admit wrongdoing
Contrary to your belief I actually don't have any devotion for FNS, he isn't even my top 3 favorite players on this NRG team and I've said many times that he can't hang anymore in vct. I don't agree with your take that they "insinuated" that he is incompetent, why else would they make roster moves. And even if they did, so what? they are being transparent and explaining to the community why they made their decision which is better than leaving us in the dark.
when the community started hating on verno the veterans ethan and fns were silent, literally did nothing to stand up for their former teammate or help him get another chance somewhere else
That's not their job nor are they obligated to do such things. Yeah, it would have been a good gesture but you can't really hold it against them for not doing that.
I mean it clearly was the best for Verno because he's, at the very least, much happier on MIBR.
For NRG? They still look dog, and they spent a lot of effort, both the org and FNS as an individual, selling "Verno is the problem" only for him to seemingly prove that wrong by performing on a new team while NRG continues to flounder. It just reeks.
It's not about whether they believed roster moves were needed, since i agree with that (and think they should've gone further) but they don't need to justify their roster moves by attempting to slander their move in both org content and FNS' own words as someone with poor work ethic and lacking team/comms participation despite evidence of these being untrue on both his prior and now also in following teams.
Just call it a synergy issue. Other orgs have given even less justification than that for other moves.
Since you're so sure that FNS has made "scathing remarks" that "slander" or defame Verno, it should be easy to quote those remarks or even mention one of the few public statements FNS has made regarding this situation. Surely we aren't referring to the Pedro interview where FNS states that "people" were "not responsive," leading to a negative practice environment?