ITS TOO EZ FOR TBD
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.19 1.46 0.92 | 239 331 148 | 24 16 8 | / 19 10 9 / | 7 5 2 | +5 +6 -1 | 75% 86% 64% | 157 211 103 | 26% 24% 31% | 5 4 1 | 3 2 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.16 1.39 0.93 | 229 264 195 | 22 15 7 | / 19 8 11 / | 7 5 2 | +3 +7 -4 | 64% 86% 43% | 146 160 132 | 15% 12% 19% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.00 1.13 0.86 | 161 164 158 | 16 9 7 | / 18 7 11 / | 6 5 1 | -2 +2 -4 | 64% 79% 50% | 106 104 109 | 33% 23% 50% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.92 0.71 1.12 | 190 135 247 | 18 6 12 | / 21 9 12 / | 9 6 3 | -3 -3 0 | 75% 86% 64% | 122 82 163 | 29% 17% 38% | 4 2 2 | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.75 1.05 0.46 | 200 263 138 | 17 12 5 | / 21 12 9 / | 6 2 4 | -4 0 -4 | 61% 71% 50% | 145 180 111 | 27% 30% 24% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.93 0.74 | 287 388 186 | 30 23 7 | / 17 5 12 / | 5 1 4 | +13 +18 -5 | 68% 86% 50% | 166 209 122 | 16% 15% 20% | 4 3 1 | 4 0 4 | 0 +3 -3 | |
|
1.14 1.15 1.13 | 208 181 236 | 18 7 11 | / 17 8 9 / | 12 7 5 | +1 -1 +2 | 68% 64% 71% | 152 138 167 | 24% 24% 25% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.85 0.81 0.89 | 132 97 169 | 15 6 9 | / 18 8 10 / | 8 5 3 | -3 -2 -1 | 64% 64% 64% | 83 66 101 | 20% 25% 17% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.84 1.02 0.66 | 203 219 187 | 20 11 9 | / 22 9 13 / | 5 4 1 | -2 +2 -4 | 61% 79% 43% | 133 142 124 | 22% 14% 36% | 2 2 0 | 2 0 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
0.72 0.71 0.73 | 203 193 213 | 15 7 8 | / 23 12 11 / | 10 7 3 | -8 -5 -3 | 75% 79% 71% | 149 143 155 | 18% 19% 17% | 4 3 1 | 6 4 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.81 0.96 1.35 | 267 378 166 | 46 29 17 | / 30 14 16 / | 7 5 2 | +16 +15 +1 | 77% 86% 69% | 165 239 101 | 27% 26% 27% | 13 9 4 | 4 2 2 | +9 +7 +2 | |
|
1.19 1.11 1.15 | 210 179 230 | 37 15 22 | / 30 11 19 / | 14 10 4 | +7 +4 +3 | 75% 82% 69% | 129 105 149 | 30% 22% 36% | 5 2 3 | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.93 1.29 1.13 | 204 127 256 | 33 11 22 | / 30 12 18 / | 11 8 3 | +3 -1 +4 | 75% 77% 73% | 129 81 170 | 29% 21% 33% | 5 1 4 | 2 0 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.25 0.74 0.97 | 211 248 186 | 34 21 13 | / 34 13 21 / | 16 8 8 | 0 +8 -8 | 67% 82% 54% | 139 154 126 | 17% 14% 20% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.82 0.65 0.73 | 171 209 148 | 27 15 12 | / 35 19 16 / | 11 5 6 | -8 -4 -4 | 63% 68% 58% | 133 146 122 | 24% 25% 23% | 3 2 1 | 7 3 4 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.12 0.88 1.01 | 188 181 203 | 30 16 14 | / 33 17 16 / | 14 9 5 | -3 -1 -2 | 60% 62% 59% | 135 128 144 | 24% 25% 21% | 2 2 0 | 4 3 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.24 0.65 0.97 | 222 276 183 | 38 28 10 | / 35 16 19 / | 9 2 7 | +3 +12 -9 | 58% 69% 45% | 147 155 137 | 15% 13% 19% | 5 4 1 | 10 5 5 | -5 -1 -4 | |
|
1.05 0.79 0.93 | 209 219 195 | 33 19 14 | / 38 18 20 / | 14 9 5 | -5 +1 -6 | 69% 81% 55% | 141 148 133 | 18% 13% 26% | 2 2 0 | 3 0 3 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
0.91 0.82 0.87 | 216 212 216 | 31 17 14 | / 39 22 17 / | 15 10 5 | -8 -5 -3 | 77% 81% 73% | 150 147 153 | 19% 24% 14% | 9 5 4 | 8 4 4 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.84 0.86 0.85 | 160 130 187 | 27 12 15 | / 32 16 16 / | 8 5 3 | -5 -4 -1 | 63% 62% 64% | 99 92 108 | 14% 13% 15% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.57 2.42 1.01 | 295 461 186 | 22 13 9 | / 11 4 7 / | 0 0 0 | +11 +9 +2 | 80% 88% 75% | 175 289 99 | 27% 29% 24% | 8 5 3 | 1 0 1 | +7 +5 +2 | |
|
1.48 2.04 1.11 | 229 257 211 | 19 9 10 | / 9 2 7 / | 5 4 1 | +10 +7 +3 | 75% 75% 75% | 137 145 132 | 31% 28% 35% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.31 0.57 1.80 | 246 63 369 | 17 2 15 | / 12 5 7 / | 5 3 2 | +5 -3 +8 | 90% 75% 100% | 161 41 241 | 26% 14% 28% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.72 1.01 0.53 | 193 221 176 | 12 6 6 | / 15 5 10 / | 9 3 6 | -3 +1 -4 | 70% 75% 67% | 128 143 119 | 19% 18% 20% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.42 0.87 | 141 115 160 | 10 3 7 | / 14 7 7 / | 5 3 2 | -4 -4 0 | 65% 63% 67% | 116 88 135 | 19% 11% 23% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.07 1.14 0.97 | 228 234 220 | 16 10 6 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 3 2 | 0 0 0 | 80% 83% 75% | 150 152 148 | 20% 29% 11% | 5 2 3 | 2 0 2 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.06 1.08 1.03 | 214 218 210 | 13 8 5 | / 16 9 7 / | 9 5 4 | -3 -1 -2 | 80% 83% 75% | 152 155 148 | 13% 12% 16% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.86 0.81 | 188 168 219 | 12 6 6 | / 14 8 6 / | 0 0 0 | -2 -2 0 | 60% 58% 63% | 122 122 120 | 10% 8% 13% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.82 1.08 0.42 | 167 181 146 | 12 9 3 | / 16 9 7 / | 2 2 0 | -4 0 -4 | 50% 58% 38% | 111 116 103 | 22% 29% 13% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.46 0.42 0.51 | 157 145 177 | 8 5 3 | / 18 11 7 / | 4 1 3 | -10 -6 -4 | 45% 50% 38% | 121 93 162 | 13% 8% 17% | 1 1 0 | 6 5 1 | -5 -4 -1 |
I actually think ENVY will win this, they are looking really good rn but If Sentinels wins, it's gonna be 2-1. I hope Sentinels gets their shit together because they aren't as dominant as I thought they would be and I want them to win sooo... ¯_ (ツ)_/¯
No matter what happens It's gonna be a close game that's for sure
don't know why everyone is doubting SEN now. Lost a net total of 4 maps and everyone thinks that they are done. The only thing they lost from these four maps are the title of "undefeated on lan". They don't seem to be mentally affected by it which is the only thing that matters for them. SEN probably takes this one in a close 2-1 but i also want to see NV come out on top for the first time in months.
NV bans split/breeze
Sen bans ascent
NV picks haven/bind/icebox???
Sen picks split/breeze
NV picks haven/bind/icebox???
I think Sen is guaranteed split/breeze, depending on which one NV bans. However NV could come back on haven/bind/icebox (not sure which ones they will pick, considering they are basically very similar skill level in all maps) Fun match tho, gl to both teams!!
I loved sentinels till they started to mocking of others and boast how good they are (2 early boys).
Now I'm happy cuz they lost against EU- t5 and NA- t3 :D
1) SEN WIN reaction:
1.1. 'team_name' so bad!
1.2. 'region_name' why so quiet?
1.3. NA best!
2) SEN LOSE reaction:
2.1. NA still best (quiet)?!
2.2. need to nerf classic!
2.3. bad bracket cuz one sided NA only (cuz place 2ndat groups).
It is pretty much what you get for always being too cocky and overconfident
Teams are getting stronger, and Sen have been like NIP back in 2012, well, shit, the rest can figure you out now :)
No hate on them tho, it is always a pleasure to watch some good matches and it went too far with NA - EU thing, i won't lie if i'd say that i genuenily felt bad for them
Disappointed that Sen made so many mistakes and didn't think that Envy would be planning something beforehand, this is international Sen you can't play like your usual selves. Should've won the overtime in Haven, and Tenz was very disappointing on split he really gota prac that map with raze.
Overall Envy played amazingly, I'm amazed and I wanna see 100t v NV. Honestly my money's on NV, they've been cracked lately.
Gambit is probably winning the whole thing as expected as long as they don't pull well... A Gambit