who would win when it comes in terms of leading a squad of 5 iron players. I got this question randomly dont ask me how i came up with this question
Let's clear this up.
Hitler - Historically one of the worst leaders in history. The man singlehandedly whiffed a war with a fully stacked army at his disposal. Leading a team of iron players? That is a 5 stack loss waiting to happen. Plus, he would probably just end up throwing mid game after blaming his entire team for the loss. Plus, he would eventually dodge the queue.
Nats - Undoubtedly one of the best lurkers in Valorant. He would singlehandedly win games while a team of 5 iron players tank for him and in case of a loss, he would just not rage quit because he suffered on Liquid for years. Instead, he would stay in the game and try his best as it was the final round.
Verdict - Nats wins 13 - 0. An assessment of Nats shows that he has sufficient knowledge and skills required to take out Hitler's outdated strats. His massive ego and lack of willingness to communicate makes things worse. Plus, he would most likely force buy every single round until his economy is destroyed. After that, Nats would travel crawl his way to victory and have Iron players being perma-spectated and noped at.
Actually no, Germany economic stability was being due to (I forgot bro name).
Aunstrian painter only continued his projects but more fast. He wasn't Germany savior.
Aunstrian Painter was a good military leader and dictator (Good means he was literally good at opression)
What led to his downfall was literally cocain.
(Not only his but German troops was fully of cocain too)
Conclusion: He was great in social politics, good at military, terrible at every single other aspect (Social politics it's about social control if u don't know)