somebody tag @sayf idk if he's going to be use trace's buddy during this...
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 1.91 1.14 | 271 300 242 | 26 16 10 | / 17 7 10 / | 10 4 6 | +9 +9 0 | 64% 71% 57% | 182 195 169 | 28% 35% 23% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.93 0.97 0.90 | 233 246 221 | 21 13 8 | / 24 12 12 / | 2 1 1 | -3 +1 -4 | 64% 71% 57% | 157 146 168 | 25% 21% 30% | 4 3 1 | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.90 0.79 1.00 | 152 156 149 | 15 7 8 | / 20 10 10 / | 10 5 5 | -5 -3 -2 | 57% 57% 57% | 107 109 104 | 32% 28% 36% | 1 0 1 | 6 4 2 | -5 -4 -1 | |
|
0.87 0.56 1.19 | 153 110 196 | 16 5 11 | / 20 11 9 / | 5 4 1 | -4 -6 +2 | 64% 64% 64% | 106 82 130 | 31% 20% 42% | 3 0 3 | 5 3 2 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.71 0.71 0.70 | 103 75 131 | 8 3 5 | / 20 9 11 / | 15 9 6 | -12 -6 -6 | 50% 50% 50% | 79 48 110 | 16% 10% 21% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.54 1.15 | 265 304 227 | 27 15 12 | / 17 9 8 / | 9 6 3 | +10 +6 +4 | 75% 71% 79% | 171 207 134 | 43% 46% 39% | 3 1 2 | 2 2 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.21 1.39 1.03 | 241 299 185 | 25 15 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 2 2 0 | +7 +6 +1 | 68% 64% 71% | 165 184 145 | 26% 29% 19% | 5 3 2 | 4 2 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.90 0.56 1.24 | 192 107 279 | 18 5 13 | / 17 8 9 / | 9 4 5 | +1 -3 +4 | 64% 50% 79% | 125 77 172 | 15% 18% 14% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.86 0.83 0.89 | 170 167 175 | 19 10 9 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 0 3 | +2 +1 +1 | 61% 64% 57% | 122 121 122 | 35% 61% 25% | 4 3 1 | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.74 0.64 | 120 124 118 | 12 7 5 | / 17 7 10 / | 8 4 4 | -5 0 -5 | 75% 86% 64% | 77 83 71 | 28% 33% 23% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.75 1.14 1.45 | 252 290 218 | 61 36 25 | / 39 17 22 / | 22 10 12 | +22 +19 +3 | 71% 76% 65% | 173 187 159 | 27% 27% 27% | 8 6 2 | 3 0 3 | +5 +6 -1 | |
|
0.87 0.96 0.91 | 203 186 228 | 45 22 23 | / 53 26 27 / | 18 8 10 | -8 -4 -4 | 65% 65% 65% | 139 122 156 | 21% 18% 24% | 10 3 7 | 9 4 5 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.89 0.90 0.90 | 149 160 139 | 41 22 19 | / 48 24 24 / | 19 9 10 | -7 -2 -5 | 63% 65% 62% | 98 96 100 | 30% 26% 35% | 4 2 2 | 8 4 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.66 1.14 0.90 | 188 153 216 | 42 16 26 | / 50 26 24 / | 19 12 7 | -8 -10 +2 | 69% 71% 68% | 131 110 153 | 30% 21% 38% | 7 2 5 | 11 8 3 | -4 -6 +2 | |
|
0.84 0.81 0.82 | 146 141 140 | 29 16 13 | / 47 23 24 / | 36 16 20 | -18 -7 -11 | 65% 68% 62% | 96 94 97 | 15% 14% 16% | 2 1 1 | 6 4 2 | -4 -3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.30 1.19 1.25 | 253 254 256 | 64 32 32 | / 44 22 22 / | 19 11 8 | +20 +10 +10 | 79% 76% 82% | 162 171 153 | 36% 33% 39% | 6 3 3 | 3 3 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.11 1.03 1.07 | 203 233 184 | 51 28 23 | / 44 22 22 / | 12 8 4 | +7 +6 +1 | 68% 71% 65% | 141 151 131 | 32% 37% 25% | 9 5 4 | 8 3 5 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.07 0.76 0.92 | 159 173 138 | 37 22 15 | / 44 19 25 / | 28 15 13 | -7 +3 -10 | 81% 94% 68% | 102 120 85 | 26% 29% 22% | 4 1 3 | 2 0 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.99 0.83 0.91 | 183 193 172 | 46 26 20 | / 42 21 21 / | 4 1 3 | +4 +5 -1 | 65% 65% 65% | 120 125 115 | 28% 32% 26% | 11 7 4 | 9 6 3 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.60 1.09 0.85 | 169 122 222 | 38 14 24 | / 45 22 23 / | 24 10 14 | -7 -8 +1 | 65% 56% 74% | 115 87 143 | 17% 13% 19% | 7 1 6 | 9 5 4 | -2 -4 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.97 2.32 1.74 | 312 359 281 | 24 11 13 | / 8 3 5 / | 9 3 6 | +16 +8 +8 | 85% 88% 83% | 218 247 199 | 33% 25% 40% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.16 1.24 1.11 | 165 177 157 | 14 6 8 | / 12 5 7 / | 6 2 4 | +2 +1 +1 | 75% 88% 67% | 106 98 111 | 26% 20% 33% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.09 1.07 1.11 | 202 194 208 | 13 5 8 | / 13 5 8 / | 10 4 6 | 0 0 0 | 80% 88% 75% | 148 129 160 | 31% 21% 38% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.09 0.97 1.18 | 211 161 246 | 15 5 10 | / 13 5 8 / | 5 1 4 | +2 0 +2 | 65% 63% 67% | 135 119 146 | 22% 16% 27% | 5 0 5 | 2 1 1 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
1.09 0.85 1.25 | 160 168 155 | 8 3 5 | / 11 6 5 / | 19 7 12 | -3 -3 0 | 80% 75% 83% | 107 127 94 | 16% 21% 12% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.04 1.28 0.70 | 234 273 177 | 16 11 5 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 2 2 | +1 +2 -1 | 80% 75% 88% | 154 179 116 | 25% 22% 29% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.82 0.94 0.64 | 177 171 186 | 13 8 5 | / 14 7 7 / | 4 3 1 | -1 +1 -2 | 60% 67% 50% | 119 118 121 | 39% 47% 29% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.73 0.52 1.04 | 176 136 236 | 12 6 6 | / 15 10 5 / | 1 1 0 | -3 -4 +1 | 55% 42% 75% | 109 84 147 | 16% 14% 18% | 2 1 1 | 4 4 0 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.69 0.27 1.32 | 152 90 246 | 10 3 7 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 3 2 | -5 -7 +2 | 50% 42% 63% | 106 64 169 | 19% 6% 36% | 2 0 2 | 5 3 2 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.55 0.83 0.14 | 102 139 47 | 5 5 0 | / 15 8 7 / | 9 5 4 | -10 -3 -7 | 75% 100% 38% | 72 93 41 | 22% 28% 11% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.81 1.20 0.24 | 172 233 83 | 11 9 2 | / 14 7 7 / | 3 3 0 | -3 +2 -5 | 65% 75% 50% | 115 139 80 | 18% 18% 18% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.75 0.51 1.11 | 210 176 262 | 13 6 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 4 4 0 | -4 -4 0 | 65% 67% 63% | 151 130 182 | 28% 22% 35% | 2 2 0 | 4 4 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.72 0.98 0.33 | 174 201 134 | 13 10 3 | / 16 8 8 / | 2 0 2 | -3 +2 -5 | 70% 83% 50% | 107 126 80 | 11% 11% 13% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.70 0.68 0.73 | 164 133 211 | 9 4 5 | / 16 9 7 / | 11 6 5 | -7 -5 -2 | 65% 58% 75% | 117 96 148 | 14% 17% 10% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.63 0.76 0.43 | 129 153 94 | 12 9 3 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 2 1 | -4 0 -4 | 60% 58% 63% | 79 80 78 | 33% 31% 38% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 2.00 1.32 | 256 308 222 | 20 10 10 | / 12 4 8 / | 11 6 5 | +8 +6 +2 | 95% 100% 92% | 168 223 131 | 26% 27% 25% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.32 0.94 1.58 | 260 139 342 | 21 6 15 | / 12 4 8 / | 6 3 3 | +9 +2 +7 | 85% 88% 83% | 158 95 200 | 39% 25% 46% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.15 1.98 0.60 | 204 325 125 | 15 10 5 | / 10 2 8 / | 0 0 0 | +5 +8 -3 | 80% 100% 67% | 128 195 84 | 31% 28% 38% | 5 3 2 | 1 0 1 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.13 0.88 1.29 | 191 210 180 | 13 5 8 | / 12 6 6 / | 6 3 3 | +1 -1 +2 | 75% 88% 67% | 131 144 122 | 33% 40% 29% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.94 1.18 0.78 | 162 199 138 | 10 6 4 | / 13 4 9 / | 10 3 7 | -3 +2 -5 | 80% 88% 75% | 111 140 91 | 18% 14% 22% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
charleser [#9]This is one of the '???' opening round matchups for champs. Logic tells me VIT 2-0 but I have no idea how Trace is going to look on the international stage. Part of me feels an upset cooking.
its not that complicated. 2-0 wash for vitality. theres nothing here
charleser [#9]This is one of the '???' opening round matchups for champs. Logic tells me VIT 2-0 but I have no idea how Trace is going to look on the international stage. Part of me feels an upset cooking.
Cut that part off u of and come back to reality
voxsu [#42]THE VOICES IN MY HEAD
I hear voices in my head
They counsel me
They understand
They talk to me
cheesus [#45]If people watch the China Valorant matches, they will see that FengF and Kai are really good. I'm not quite sure how they will perform here
Sayf clears
fictional [#67]Shitmea back to 1 team region and it's Fnatic
TH? I know they’re not amazing now but they’d do a lot better than V0tality
YaoMung [#76]TH? I know they’re not amazing now but they’d do a lot better than V0tality
calm down vit are also good just wait to finish this match
washeddiamondbot [#100]how this piss region still gets 4 slots should be criminal
Ye bro EMEA should have just 2 slot for Heretic and Fnatic
Notfinnish [#114]Ye bro EMEA should have just 2 slot for Heretic and Fnatic
actually my point well said
max9 [#120]now?
finally, everytime they about to close the game they lost like FPX. I’m glad for them like show us something.
VanGuard94 [#155]Vitality pretty underperformed today, but lets be honest. Trace played rly good. Hats off to their very 1st win on intl stage. (Thx 4 correction)
BLG beat nrg twice at Champions 2023.
FPX beat fut at Masters Shanghai.
sameer40 [#12]no way trace gets 1 map right..
why do people think this have you even watched a trace game before
number2_cNed_fan [#17]W game VIT win this is free for Temoc best coach ever WWWWWWWWWWW my GOAT
W game Trace n this is free. Kai and luoking best wwww goat
Savagegeezer [#156]The talent of the player pool in Valorant is wildly lower than any other competitive shooter. Dying with nades in hand, botched sprays, never checking corners properly. Garbage product Vitality. Get your shit together.
May be because the ceiling is higher in valorant? Other than what is in CSGO, there is agent pool and flexbility, there is higher utility usage depth, there is higher depth with how to deal with enemies' util, and so on. Other than that, the teams are getting noticibly better every year.
rayznn [#126]Why tf did i changes my pickems to vit at the last second
i did the same thing i had all 4 chinese teams go through as second seed and was like well TE are kinda inconsistent sooo
xSaneZ [#164]why do people think this have you even watched a trace game before
Its mostly because of experience. Teams in past have have shown real good form in their first international yet failed to win a match like Loud and EDG
_Nonsense [#24]Not many people watch China but FengF is actually a really good duelist. TE explosive gameplay might catch VIT off guard. I want to believe an upset here
TE 2-1
Keep on cooking fellow RC fan.
washeddiamondbot [#130]actually my point well said
Vitality wasn't that bad, it's just that Trace played better. Glad to see Trace win, Vitality's coach was very disrespectful.
Amexdxyz [#152]TH wouldn't have lost to TE😂
I think they would have, TE performed much better than FPX, who was quite a match for TH.
sata700 [#179]May be because the ceiling is higher in valorant? Other than what is in CSGO, there is agent pool and flexbility, there is higher utility usage depth, there is higher depth with how to deal with enemies' util, and so on. Other than that, the teams are getting noticibly better every year.
nah mate, #156 is talking about the most BASIC of shit, fundamentals that man in tier 3 cs wouldn't be caught lacking in.