type yes or no. need to know to see peoples thoughts
idkmanwth [#4]i see fnatic haters in here, damn
nah, tokyo isnt mickey mouse
its only lock in and has nothing to do with FNC, even if LOUD won I would still call it mickey mouse
BulkyLettuce [#2]no, the only mickey mouse is lock in because of single elim
riot themselves knew that shit was mickey mouse thats why they never did it again lmao
not even the mickey mouse paper rex won :/
BulkyLettuce [#5]nah, tokyo isnt mickey mouse
its only lock in and has nothing to do with FNC, even if LOUD won I would still call it mickey mouse
lock in so mickey mouse even prx couldnt win
BulkyLettuce [#5]nah, tokyo isnt mickey mouse
its only lock in and has nothing to do with FNC, even if LOUD won I would still call it mickey mouse
Lock in was a mickey mouse and tokyo was a fluke
EG true 2023 best team.
Aayan [#9]No, the best teams(ish) at the time qualified and roughly placed accordingly
loud begs to differ
Azzelastia [#10]Lock in was a mickey mouse and tokyo was a fluke
EG true 2023 best team.
least biased NA fan
idkmanwth [#8]lock in so mickey mouse even prx couldnt win
are you slow? single elim is mickey mouse bc of luck, double elim is the only real format
BulkyLettuce [#13]are you slow? single elim is mickey mouse bc of luck, double elim is the only real format
single elim isnt mickey its harder, shows which teams can consistently win, just because you hate fnatic doesnt mean you can say they were lucky
jonny05 [#7]not even the mickey mouse paper rex won :/
i mean yea, single elim is luck
double elim is the only real format
idkmanwth [#14]single elim isnt mickey its harder, shows which teams can consistently win, just because you hate fnatic doesnt mean you can say they were lucky
in double elim the most consistent team wins, in single elim the luckiest team wins
hell_on_earth [#11]loud begs to differ
that's why I said ish
but even then, would you not have put loud at least top 3 during kick off?
all of the current top teams (except SEN) were in their infancy roster wise, with very little practice.
BulkyLettuce [#18]in double elim the most consistent team wins, in single elim the luckiest team wins
guess who doesnt win?? prx
idkmanwth [#20]guess who doesnt win?? prx
dont know why i can never have a normal convo with indian flags, so weird to me
perma bringing up flairs and never talking about the topic at hand
BulkyLettuce [#21]dont know why i can never have a normal convo with indian flags, so weird to me
perma bringing up flairs and never talking about the topic at hand
so sorry your peanut brain had to resort to bringing in my flag in the convo, plus everyone on this site knows youre a baiter so none of your convo are normal
Aayan [#19]that's why I said ish
but even then, would you not have put loud at least top 3 during kick off?
all of the current top teams (except SEN) were in their infancy roster wise, with very little practice.
all of the current top teams (except SEN) were in their infancy roster wise, with very little practice.
which is exactly why it was a mickey lol
berrys [#24]no tournament is "micky mouse" idk why people keep saying this
exactly lol, sen were the dominant team then, they deserved to win
sergueiessenine [#25]all of the current top teams (except SEN) were in their infancy roster wise, with very little practice.
which is exactly why it was a mickey lol
I think we just have a different understanding of the term 'mickey mouse'
to me it's mickey mouse if: teams that aren't good at the time (relative to everyone else) are present.
why you are saying it's mickey mouse: if the teams that are good on average for the whole year aren't present, then it's mickey mouse.
correct me if my interpretation of what you're saying is wrong
Aayan [#28]I think we just have a different understanding of the term 'mickey mouse'
to me it's mickey mouse if: teams that aren't good at the time (relative to everyone else) are present.
why you are saying it's mickey mouse: if the teams that are good on average for the whole year aren't present, then it's mickey mouse.
correct me if my interpretation of what you're saying is wrong
why you are saying it's mickey mouse: if the teams that are good on average for the whole year aren't present, then it's mickey mouse.
pretty much yeah. i mean it's hard to take that event seriously when the winner cant even qualify/struggles to qualify to subsequent events. there were too little teams for my liking too
sergueiessenine [#29]why you are saying it's mickey mouse: if the teams that are good on average for the whole year aren't present, then it's mickey mouse.
pretty much yeah. i mean it's hard to take that event seriously when the winner cant even qualify/struggles to qualify to subsequent events. there were too little teams for my liking too
But if you subscribe to that logic, every single first tournament is and always will be a mickey mouse, because the teams that do well at the start, outside of say the top 3 rarely maintain their form for the rest of the year as other teams catch up/meta changes. Are you willing to say with 100% certainty that every masters 1 will be mickey mouse?
BulkyLettuce [#17]double elim rewards consistency, single elim is all luck
luck in 5 back to back series? maybe you should learn about probability before commenting stupid shit
Azzelastia [#10]Lock in was a mickey mouse and tokyo was a fluke
EG true 2023 best team.
least retarded int flagger
Aayan [#31]But if you subscribe to that logic, every single first tournament is and always will be a mickey mouse, because the teams that do well at the start, outside of say the top 3 rarely maintain their form for the rest of the year as other teams catch up/meta changes. Are you willing to say with 100% certainty that every masters 1 will be mickey mouse?
Are you willing to say with 100% certainty that every masters 1 will be mickey mouse?
yeah im fine with that