type yes or no. need to know to see peoples thoughts
I meant to concur with your point - he does have part of a point in the fact that I do much prefer double elim over single elim. Doesn't mean single elim isn't much harder though - I definitely don't think Lock // In was a mickey mouse. (I don't think any tournaments are mickey mouse, but I don't think very many people agree with me.)
I think we just have a different understanding of the term 'mickey mouse'
to me it's mickey mouse if: teams that aren't good at the time (relative to everyone else) are present.
why you are saying it's mickey mouse: if the teams that are good on average for the whole year aren't present, then it's mickey mouse.
correct me if my interpretation of what you're saying is wrong
why you are saying it's mickey mouse: if the teams that are good on average for the whole year aren't present, then it's mickey mouse.
pretty much yeah. i mean it's hard to take that event seriously when the winner cant even qualify/struggles to qualify to subsequent events. there were too little teams for my liking too
But if you subscribe to that logic, every single first tournament is and always will be a mickey mouse, because the teams that do well at the start, outside of say the top 3 rarely maintain their form for the rest of the year as other teams catch up/meta changes. Are you willing to say with 100% certainty that every masters 1 will be mickey mouse?
Imagine a new meta kicks in with new agents and only 8 teams who have no idea how to play it professionally just play each other like a ranked game. If there's atleast 12 teams, more games and more time to improve gameplay. 8 is just mickey and we all know 1st tournament of the year doesn't mean shit.
they will keep the same format for kick off and stage 1 coming into 2025 so i guess every start of the year is mickey mouse then
https://liquipedia.net/valorant/VCT/2025/Americas_League/Kickoff
Because the team who won regionals in beggining of the year, arent the best team overral. they just have advatange over team who changed the roster. Think about Sentinels, i dont think they will have a great kick off and even a great stage 1. The roster just losted two importants players, so they need rebuild the team. And think about LEVIATAN or even G2. They have a lot time advantage, beucase they dont change they roster yet. So the team who win kickoff is most likely the team who maintain the same roster.
Thats why this is a mickey mouse.
But Sentinels weren’t the same exact team from the previous year, they changed out 2 of their players just like how Lev changed 3 of their players, and they were still competitive with the rest of the competition early on in Kick-Off. It probably boils down to how much preparation they do in the off season since Sen by far did the most off-season tournaments relative to the rest of the Americas teams last year.
No tournament is mickey mouse. Why do people even consider Masters Madrid and Lock In as mickey mouse? Masters Madrid - the best teams at that time got there according to the rules, so why should it be a low-ranking tournament? Lock In was the biggest tournament so far, all franchise teams took part there, the best team at the time, Fnatic, won and people have nothing to doubt here.
No tournament is mickey mouse
Wrong.
Short version: Everyone playing according to the rules doesn't guarantee competitive integrity - it's literally the most basic requirement that you don't cheat and have rules that apply to everyone equally. A tournament with high competitive integrity will have a format that is designed to select for the best team.
Long version : (Allat warning) https://www.vlr.gg/393738/fnatic-was-never-great
Overall answer: No
But are you asking about tournament itself or SEN's run?
For the tournament itself the qualifier (Kickoff) was questionable (single elim playoffs is trash), but there was a double elim group stage and play-ins.
For SEN's (or any other winning team) run there is a simple test: Can you reasonably name any other team in the world that was better at the time?
For that the answer is a clear No.