GC talent pool

assuming a pool of 12.6 million valorant players and 150 franchised players, 0.0012% of players are franchised.
assuming the lowest possible percentage, 30% of the 12.6 million valorant players are female.
that should mean, assuming no outside factors, that 30% of the 150 franchised players should be female. clearly, that's not the case.
(i have chosen to exclude lgbtq cus of no clear data)

what this means is that the reason gc is behind can't solely be attributed to a smaller talent pool. there are other differences.
im not giving any opinion about gc as a scene btw, just pointing out that people who attribute gaps solely to a smaller talent pool are wrong.

edit: let's lower that percentage down for experimental purposes. there should anecdotally be less women in ranked. assume that in immortal, you play 5 games a day and meet one woman. so, for every 20 players you meet, you meet one woman. 1/20 = 5%. again, making the same assumptions i made before, 5% of 150 franchised players should be female. again, that's not the case. there are even more factors outside of that women appear to enjoy ranked less.

idk but yay clears 🐐

immediately attributing it to physical differences is also equally intellectually lazy
they could just be shit players
they are shit players

So you're assuming the percentage females in casual valorant is the same as percentage females in Asc+ ? :)

Play in ranked and see how girls r treated when they open mic.... So most prefer chilling in swiftplay or unrated
In people who play ranked , females will be way lesser than 30% . But even then what ur saying is right

assuming the lowest possible percentage, 30% of the 12.6 million valorant players are female.

huh? Specially players that play comp it's much, much less than that.

So you get 3 girls in your team every 2 games? Bro's saying whatever

stop yapping my friend

I didn’t get what you meant but all I can tell is that they are shit that’s all (compared to franchised pros)

what if those franchise ready players are male on the top of the ranked leaderboard and with crazy stats? should teams really downgrade their roster by putting a less talented or consistent player just for the sake of the opinions? i think not. all i know is like 6 or 7 GC players that deserve Franchising based on their skill, yeah would be great for the scene but i think orgs want to build game winning teams not clout winning teams. and since 95% of highly skilled players are male there is a very little chance that a GC or any other Tier2 player would be picked. All players have to prove themselves, no matter their gender or ethnicity or whatever. if you are really good, you get a spot, if you know people, you get a spot, if you haven't proved yourself you're probably not getting into Franchising.