Sen 2-0 Optic
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.02 1.19 0.93 | 191 211 182 | 12 4 8 | / 14 4 10 / | 5 2 3 | -2 0 -2 | 61% 67% 58% | 121 125 119 | 29% 31% 27% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.96 0.83 1.03 | 182 154 197 | 11 3 8 | / 13 4 9 / | 4 2 2 | -2 -1 -1 | 50% 33% 58% | 124 112 130 | 23% 29% 20% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.83 1.13 0.68 | 199 207 196 | 12 5 7 | / 16 5 11 / | 1 0 1 | -4 0 -4 | 56% 83% 42% | 135 138 133 | 28% 67% 17% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.69 1.24 0.42 | 143 235 98 | 8 5 3 | / 15 4 11 / | 5 0 5 | -7 +1 -8 | 56% 67% 50% | 86 128 65 | 13% 18% 7% | 2 2 0 | 2 0 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
0.26 0.02 0.44 | 134 96 154 | 7 2 5 | / 18 7 11 / | 5 2 3 | -11 -5 -6 | 61% 50% 67% | 91 61 106 | 14% 7% 17% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.81 1.80 1.84 | 310 299 335 | 21 14 7 | / 8 5 3 / | 3 0 3 | +13 +9 +4 | 89% 83% 100% | 182 189 168 | 40% 34% 54% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.17 1.30 | 242 228 273 | 16 10 6 | / 10 6 4 / | 3 2 1 | +6 +4 +2 | 72% 75% 67% | 156 149 171 | 13% 5% 30% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.15 1.32 0.81 | 219 252 154 | 14 10 4 | / 10 6 4 / | 4 2 2 | +4 +4 0 | 83% 92% 67% | 140 170 81 | 28% 30% 17% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.05 1.19 0.77 | 211 226 183 | 14 11 3 | / 11 7 4 / | 3 1 2 | +3 +4 -1 | 83% 83% 83% | 136 140 130 | 30% 35% 21% | 3 3 0 | 2 1 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.82 1.04 | 178 151 233 | 11 7 4 | / 11 7 4 / | 6 2 4 | 0 0 0 | 78% 75% 83% | 132 101 193 | 19% 18% 20% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.69 1.49 1.12 | 207 159 251 | 28 9 19 | / 27 15 12 / | 8 2 6 | +1 -6 +7 | 59% 44% 71% | 140 109 166 | 26% 28% 25% | 2 1 1 | 4 2 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.50 1.21 0.88 | 177 120 224 | 23 6 17 | / 29 15 14 / | 15 5 10 | -6 -9 +3 | 64% 50% 76% | 109 77 138 | 22% 20% 23% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.79 0.83 | 197 175 215 | 26 12 14 | / 33 15 18 / | 5 1 4 | -7 -3 -4 | 59% 61% 57% | 131 123 138 | 24% 42% 14% | 7 2 5 | 5 2 3 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.71 0.66 0.69 | 155 157 156 | 21 10 11 | / 31 15 16 / | 10 1 9 | -10 -5 -5 | 56% 50% 62% | 92 91 93 | 21% 22% 20% | 4 3 1 | 6 3 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.49 0.67 0.57 | 151 163 144 | 20 10 10 | / 34 18 16 / | 10 4 6 | -14 -8 -6 | 67% 61% 71% | 98 97 99 | 18% 14% 23% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.10 1.70 1.38 | 251 192 311 | 36 15 21 | / 22 13 9 / | 11 4 7 | +14 +2 +12 | 72% 62% 83% | 150 121 184 | 32% 34% 31% | 5 2 3 | 1 1 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.28 1.24 1.26 | 256 252 264 | 37 19 18 | / 26 14 12 / | 8 3 5 | +11 +5 +6 | 72% 67% 78% | 171 168 174 | 29% 22% 35% | 11 5 6 | 4 2 2 | +7 +3 +4 | |
|
1.02 1.30 1.15 | 231 217 252 | 31 17 14 | / 24 15 9 / | 8 2 6 | +7 +2 +5 | 79% 71% 89% | 154 134 178 | 30% 35% 26% | 6 4 2 | 5 3 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.08 1.21 1.14 | 200 209 188 | 28 15 13 | / 23 14 9 / | 9 4 5 | +5 +1 +4 | 79% 81% 78% | 132 138 125 | 31% 32% 30% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.62 1.30 0.94 | 162 127 202 | 22 10 12 | / 23 15 8 / | 15 6 9 | -1 -5 +4 | 77% 71% 83% | 114 81 152 | 21% 14% 26% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.25 0.61 2.10 | 231 162 324 | 17 6 11 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 0 4 | +3 -5 +8 | 67% 50% 89% | 153 107 215 | 30% 26% 33% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.84 0.72 0.99 | 168 197 132 | 13 8 5 | / 16 11 5 / | 5 2 3 | -3 -3 0 | 71% 67% 78% | 104 115 90 | 23% 17% 40% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.84 0.77 0.93 | 194 160 241 | 14 7 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 4 1 3 | -3 -3 0 | 62% 50% 78% | 128 115 144 | 21% 33% 10% | 3 0 3 | 4 2 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.16 1.59 | 162 74 280 | 11 2 9 | / 15 11 4 / | 10 3 7 | -4 -9 +5 | 67% 42% 100% | 100 52 163 | 15% 8% 19% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.68 0.45 0.99 | 166 118 232 | 13 5 8 | / 16 11 5 / | 5 1 4 | -3 -6 +3 | 57% 42% 78% | 97 73 130 | 29% 27% 31% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.31 1.43 1.21 | 270 285 259 | 21 9 12 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 1 4 | +5 +1 +4 | 71% 56% 83% | 183 194 175 | 42% 50% 38% | 8 3 5 | 1 0 1 | +7 +3 +4 | |
|
1.23 0.78 1.57 | 251 204 286 | 17 6 11 | / 13 8 5 / | 5 1 4 | +4 -2 +6 | 76% 56% 92% | 170 126 203 | 30% 36% 28% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.13 0.76 1.41 | 181 151 205 | 14 5 9 | / 13 8 5 / | 5 2 3 | +1 -3 +4 | 76% 67% 83% | 124 95 147 | 34% 36% 33% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.01 0.18 1.63 | 191 49 299 | 15 1 14 | / 14 8 6 / | 8 4 4 | +1 -7 +8 | 57% 33% 75% | 122 30 192 | 23% 33% 22% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.97 0.36 1.43 | 146 94 186 | 11 3 8 | / 12 8 4 / | 9 4 5 | -1 -5 +4 | 76% 67% 83% | 98 54 132 | 23% 8% 32% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
TSM and Sentinels both dominated the Valorant scene when the game was new. But with time, the better players started coming and both the teams lagged out. But TSM did a smart move by making so many roaster changes that I feel like they now stand a chance. But Sentinels... Nobody(or maybe just a few) believe in them ATLEAST for now
I completely agree. A lot of people would still point to their past performance not knowing that VALORANT is more tactical and competitive now; so it's more meaningful and remarkable to be dominant now than back then when the game was new and the professional scene inchoate -- teams were still in the exploring stage, not many formidable teams/players had joined in as they have now, and Sentinel, which had joined very early on, simply was ahead of the curve in their understanding of the game.
Now that the game has developed, they slumped. This era will be the one to truly determine the GOAT candidates in terms of team and players.
And Sentinel, is not looking impressive. Given the current trajectory, I suspect they will simply be remembered as the one-time wonders. The weight of their past legacy lies in the hand of their current performance. Otherwise, a shadow will be cast on their past performance and give us a reason to doubt whether their feats were truly magnificent and they were truly spectacular.
Close match but Optic 2-1 SEN Since Optic has been defeating their opponents and the 2nd ranked team in NA but SEN has always found a way to clutch the games. (SEN 10-0ed in the lower brackets in the 2nd quali, SEN fought back and defeated XSET in the grand finals when they were sent to the lower bracket)
edit: SEN got destroyed by a ton of unforeseen circumstances (TenZ and Kyedae getting COVID, SicK's family emergency) it was just a total mess.
Faze defeated C9 2-0 if SEN defeats both Faze and C9 or Faze or C9 or if they lose their next game (C9 vs LG and Faze vs EG) they have a good shot in reaching the main event so I still have faith in them.
I hope that TenZ and SicK will be able to reach in time to be able to play for their games against Faze and C9
Okay im going to get some hate. Rise is better idc you guys are all shit low tier piss low. If you are a optic or sen fan you are a bandwagon....Shanks is 10x the player of rawkus yes the coach. Derrek was 20x the player of shahz and they dropped the best player zombs. Fuck it idc anymore Team toaster is up next with deepstroking,Mo,Jack,Brew,Project baby. Its over for yall
Sen 2-0
Script leak:
The score is 0 - 12. It's Optic's match point.
Suddenly, Shazam disconnects from the server due to technical issues.
Sentinels call a tech pause but Shazam computer is totally fried, they need to find a substitute...
A new player joins the server.
It's SEN Steel.
They win 14 - 12, 13 - 0.
Ez Masters 2. Ez Champions.
Sinatraa still under training by riot.
And Zombs hasn't played in 3 months.
That's what I am gonna say.
Edit: I am not talking about getting unbanned which happened in sep 2021.
I am talking about the training which riot initially cancelled but then reverted back due to backlash.
here's the revert statement: https://twitter.com/JakeSucky/status/1515082810196783105?s=20&t=AkbBvvAp_Gi7zYmxTAwL2Q
and they did ask zombs to sub..but he denied.
His response: https://youtu.be/KFUJc30ZahA
Rawkus I can understand subbing in but D A N I ? It's not like they don't have two world class top players on the bench in sinatraa/zombs? Shahzam decides to give his T2 friend the opportunity to play in a MUST WIN match over former teammates that have previously taken the team to championships...lol
I mean they could have got anyone else other than shahzam's friend, they have tons of connections in the scene and I don't think Dani and Rawkus are the individuals they choose to play with IF they want to win. From their play we could all tell its just for fun and the team looks like its falling apart