He might be the most expensive player in Pacific and China. Could play any agent at the high level, can igling, and have good multilingual skills
| Flag: | International |
| Registered: | October 6, 2021 |
| Last post: | December 1, 2024 at 8:16 AM |
| Posts: | 2270 |
He might be the most expensive player in Pacific and China. Could play any agent at the high level, can igling, and have good multilingual skills
Because it feels too ez for them
Kamo really don't know how to play with team
No way hahaha lmao, you lived on difference universe bruh?
Just open your eyes and judge it objectively
He said Tenz best mechanics when Tenz himself said its Primmie, so why not?
but if you don't need any word from tenz, it just requires you to open both of your eyes clearly to see how primmie shoots, moves, and positions himself
so how do you explain to me when Tenz himself admits that primmie is the best player in terms of mechanics
Bruh many ppl disagree with me and said meteor, but you said Less?🤡
as easy as you see post match interview. Just correct it they said "main caller" not igl, because all of PRX player are a caller
There is no "too early" to see how he shoots and moves. It's absolutely a miracle
no way your logical way of thinking is by comparing team achievements rather than assessing what the individual really has
So just tell who? And how you said its more potential? By his achievement with his team?
Omg kids nowadays
Think with your brain, it's not a complex logic
yeah accept that, because if it makes sense then it's not a wonder
There is 1 thing that Chronicle has never done as a flex, being the main caller/IGL
Pretty sure you snuck only to what you have seen and not to pay attention to what you have not seen
If there anyone better, might be on another universe
First time they won 2-0
The actual problem is on something, they need some flex player who can be igling too
lol he can only use raze, reyna, sage, pheonix, and deadlock. Even so he can still be a match mvp, what a ranked player.
He won't be able to survive playing in international with the upcoming meta and patches
He should get out😡
Jingg only can play ranked agent instead of cypher lmao
Grumble still underage cmiiw
Good prospect tho
Indo team had 90% win against ph team
I think what they need is one more flex, because something just look uncomfortable playing flex
If PRX has to change its roster, who do you think will be replaced and who will be the replacement?
no one available flex in sea who better than k1ng, so take someone from korea definitely a better choice
estrella out, k1ngg in
For now:
All time:
All champions just like that. Not surprised
Yes, aspas vs everybody incoming
If you really want to make a career in the international pro scene, at least play in ranked Singapore server.
Even if you get 80 pings, it will mold you harder to get better faster.
Strive to be Tier S with those conditions on that server, then if that happens you might be one of the players who can compete at the international level.
Kaajak isn't that good
yeah bro, I limit it only for 3 pages from your recent comment.
Thanks, will find a way to make this code execute quickly when using all the data in the user comment.
The user exhibits a mix of engagement, strong opinions, and harsh criticisms, particularly toward certain teams and players. Here’s a breakdown of their characteristics and discussion points:
Highly Opinionated and Direct: The user frequently makes blunt, sometimes aggressive statements without much moderation (e.g., calling a team "dogshit" or "pathetic"). This can come across as toxic, especially in competitive gaming communities, where tone matters.
Competitive Focus and Intensity: The user is highly knowledgeable about specific teams and players, particularly within the Valorant community. They clearly follow tournaments, player performance, and strategy intricately, as shown by detailed comparisons between teams and rosters.
Critical and Pessimistic: They often critique teams' performances, downplaying certain players or teams, while emphasizing perceived flaws, like “SEN is getting shat on” or “EG is like 12th team in Americas.” This can make their attitude seem negative and perhaps overly critical.
Sarcastic and Dismissive: The user uses sarcasm and dismissive language, especially when discussing teams they don’t seem to favor. For instance, referring to a team’s efforts as "dogshit" or calling a player a "French fraud" suggests a lack of empathy or consideration for how these statements might be received.
Loyalty with Specific Players and Teams: Despite their overall critical tone, the user shows respect for certain individuals (e.g., they favor Zellsis on SEN) and occasionally acknowledges good performances or "good games."
Bias and Potential Nationalism: The user has a slight bias toward certain regions, like China, which they believe will dominate esports, as seen in statements like "China will soon become the only region to win trophies."
Valorant Team and Player Rankings:
The user ranks teams within regions, expressing strong opinions on team strengths and weaknesses. They specifically rate NRG, G2, and LEV as top teams in the Americas.
They’re particularly critical of SEN (Sentinels), often placing them low in their rankings, suggesting they’re “getting shat on” by other teams.
Player Criticism and Praise:
They hold a favorable view of players like Mada and Crashies, claiming Mada is a "top 3 duelist in the world" and Crashies as one of the best players.
The user negatively rates other players, mentioning that some struggle against even “decent duelists” or get “diffed” (outperformed) by other players.
Team Strategy and Coaching:
They criticize SEN’s strategy, especially mentioning how SEN’s coach and compositions are problematic.
They feel that SEN’s coaching choices have led to ineffective strategies, calling for changes to improve the team's performance.
Upcoming Valorant Region Dominance:
The user is confident that China will dominate Valorant, implying that other regions may be lagging.
They discuss how Chinese teams and investments are positioning to lead in future tournaments.
Inter-Region Rivalries and Esports Comparison:
Besides Valorant, the user comments on League of Legends, drawing comparisons between Valorant and League’s opening ceremonies and teams.
They exhibit frustration over perceived differences in quality and entertainment between the two games.
Player Transfers and Roster Moves:
They speculate on potential player transfers and criticize roster choices, like replacing players on SEN.
They question why certain players are given roles or placed in “sentinel prison,” showing in-depth knowledge of game strategy.
International Tournaments and Scheduling:
They show excitement for international Valorant tournaments scheduled in China, demonstrating anticipation for the future of Valorant esports on a global scale.
This user appears to be knowledgeable about competitive Valorant, with a passion for team dynamics, player performance, and regional rivalries. However, their tone leans toward toxic and critical, often dismissing teams or players harshly without constructive feedback. Their directness and sarcasm might alienate other forum users, as they seem to prioritize blunt opinions over constructive discussion.
Passionate Fan with Critical Views: The user is highly engaged with the competitive gaming scene, especially in Valorant and League of Legends. They have detailed opinions on team compositions, player performance, and regional gaming dynamics. However, they express these views critically, often pointing out weaknesses in teams or players.
Cynical and Realistic Tone: The user often uses sarcastic language, particularly when discussing underperforming teams or regions. They also use some toxic language and humor, indicating a level of cynicism.
Knowledgeable but Judgmental: The user displays deep knowledge of various players, regions, and teams, indicating they follow the gaming scene closely. However, they sometimes dismiss certain players or regions with blunt language and a lack of empathy, suggesting a judgmental attitude.
Tendency for Mild Toxicity: Use of dismissive language like “ass” and “retarded,” along with skull (💀) emojis to signify perceived failure or weakness, reflects a tendency toward toxicity.
Humorous and Sarcastic: Some of the comments are meant to be humorous, although often at the expense of others. They appear to enjoy using sarcasm and exaggeration.
Focus on Player and Team Performance: They frequently discuss which players are performing well or poorly, revealing a focus on competitive performance. They assess team dynamics, individual skills, and potential, indicating a highly performance-oriented view of the gaming community.
The user’s comments touch on several themes and topics:
Player and Team Analysis:
They mention numerous players and teams, such as "BOOM," "PRX," "X3B," "famouz," and "Splash," critiquing their skill levels and potential.
They discuss roster changes, team dynamics, and the impact of players like "melser and mazino" on teams, suggesting a broad awareness of competitive rosters.
Regional Gaming Scene:
They talk extensively about the SEA (Southeast Asia) region, including struggles of ID (Indonesia), MY (Malaysia), and SG (Singapore) teams, and express a somewhat pessimistic view of the region’s ability to compete internationally.
They mention regions like Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines and analyze the challenges of forming competitive teams there, touching on talent availability, team funding, and language barriers.
In-depth Game and Mechanic Critiques:
The user comments on various in-game roles, such as duelist and support roles, and discusses game mechanics like the "wall and flash" utility, “molly,” and "ult" effectiveness.
They debate player abilities, team compositions, and in-game decisions, showing their interest in tactical gameplay details.
Comparison of Competitive Leagues:
The user compares Valorant with League of Legends, discussing aspects like viewership, sponsorship, and fan base, and makes references to esports events and storylines in both games.
They voice preferences for platforms (e.g., preferring YouTube for moderation) and discuss the organization and hype around specific esports events.
Discussion on Individual Players:
Specific players like “kangkang,” “famous,” and “munchkin” are highlighted, with the user often critiquing their skills or contributions to the team.
They make references to players from past leagues and events, indicating long-term knowledge and perhaps nostalgia for older rosters or player highlights.
Regional Linguistic and Cultural Observations:
The user comments on language use in teams, mentioning challenges in communication due to language diversity in the SEA region. They suggest that team dynamics and performance could be impacted by language barriers and discuss which players are comfortable with English.
Event Commentary and Nostalgia:
They discuss past events, such as the 2019 League of Legends Worlds and the "Arcane" opening ceremonies, comparing them to current events and expressing nostalgic preferences.
They praise memorable performances and iconic players, while critiquing newer or less impressive events.
The user is a passionate, experienced esports fan with in-depth knowledge of Valorant and League of Legends scenes. They are highly opinionated, often critical, and sometimes toxic, especially when discussing underperforming teams or regions. They value strong competitive performance, tactical gameplay, and team dynamics but are somewhat pessimistic about SEA’s prospects. Despite their harsh tone, they offer detailed insights and assessments on players, team strategies, and regional challenges, showing genuine engagement and investment in the gaming community.
Based on the user’s comments, they appear to be highly engaged with the esports community, especially regarding the Chinese and Asian regions' competitive scenes in games like Valorant and other popular esports titles. Their comments reflect detailed knowledge of players, teams, strategies, and regional esports dynamics. The user also makes analytical observations and speculations regarding various players' performances, team dynamics, and coaching strategies.
Informed and Enthusiastic: The user possesses deep knowledge of esports, specifically Asian teams, player stats, and team compositions. Their insights reflect a passion for the games and their community.
Analytical: They provide in-depth analyses of team compositions, player roles, and tactical advantages, showcasing an understanding of game strategy.
Supportive and Insightful, with Mild Frustration at Times: While the user generally offers positive or constructive feedback, they also express mild frustration toward certain player decisions or coaching strategies.
Humorous and Engaging: Occasionally, the user injects humor (e.g., “LMAO”) or makes witty remarks, indicating a lighthearted side.
Overall, this user appears to be knowledgeable, engaged, and mostly constructive, with some hints of frustration or criticism that are typical in passionate fandoms. They do not exhibit overt toxicity.
Team Dynamics and Strategy
The user frequently comments on team composition, such as the suitability of having two flash characters versus two smokes, and the impact of mid-round calls on team performance.
They suggest specific strategic adjustments, e.g., recommending certain players for specific roles (e.g., “don’t let abo play op anymore, his vandal is much better”), indicating they’re well-versed in player roles and optimal team setups.
Performance and Player Analysis
They assess individual players’ performances in depth, mentioning players by name (e.g., “swerl is a top 3 duelist in VCTCN”) and analyzing their skill set, flexibility, and clutch abilities.
The user praises young talent and upcoming players, emphasizing their potential and recent improvements, which shows an appreciation for skill development within the scene.
Industry Trends and Audience Preferences
The user notes a shift in audience preferences from MOBA to FPS games in China, attributing this change to the gameplay appeal of FPS titles. They compare audience engagement trends, observing the increasing popularity of FPS esports in China.
Coaching and Team Management
The user discusses the impact of coaching on team performance, sometimes criticizing impulsive management decisions like switching coaches after a single loss.
They also speculate about future coach and player transfers, showing a detailed understanding of industry happenings and the importance of stable team management.
Comparisons Across Regions
They compare various regional teams (e.g., EDG in China, DRX in Korea) and comment on cross-regional tournaments, indicating a comprehensive view of global competitive landscapes.
The user discusses specific teams and organizations’ approaches, like Riot Games’ regional tournament setups, and suggests opening more opportunities for T2 teams in regions like Australia.
Game Updates and Suggestions
Occasionally, the user offers opinions on game mechanics, such as suggesting a nerf for a specific character (Neon) or commenting on the quality of in-game graphics.
The user appears to be an avid esports fan with substantial expertise in the field, especially regarding team and player analysis, coaching strategies, and industry trends. While passionate and occasionally critical, they maintain a mostly positive and analytical stance, contributing thoughtful insights into the esports community without engaging in outright toxic behavior.
The user who posted this collection of comments on the vlr.gg forum shows a mix of humor, sarcasm, gaming culture references, and somewhat toxic behavior. Here’s a breakdown of their personality traits and the points discussed in their comments:
Humor with a Sarcastic Edge: The user frequently uses humor, sometimes in a dark or sarcastic manner. Many phrases are playful, though often laced with critical or satirical remarks (e.g., "bros tweaking the fuck out," "move aside lil bro u aint getting that fembussy").
Toxicity and Insults: Several comments reveal a tendency toward derogatory language, occasionally directed at players, teams, or other forum users. This includes insults and terms that could be interpreted as offensive (e.g., "ur leak came from ur ass buddy," "shitmea dont stand no chance").
Involvement in Gaming Culture: References to players, in-game mechanics, team strategies, and esports news suggest a strong familiarity with the Valorant community and gaming culture. The user discusses player performance, strategy, and team dynamics in detail, revealing both interest and knowledge in the competitive scene.
Sarcastic Appreciation and Critique: The user occasionally praises players or teams but often in a way that seems sarcastic or overly critical. For example, when discussing player movements or team decisions, they can come off as dismissive or derisive.
Use of Internet Slang and Memes: Common online phrases, slang, and meme language are prevalent in their comments, making them sound informal and part of the typical gaming forum style.
Playful, Yet at Times Crude Language: The language can be provocative and crude, especially with references that are sexual or meant to be shocking. This appears to be part of the user’s attempt at humor, though it may come off as distasteful to others.
Player and Team Analysis:
The user talks about player performance (e.g., "cant beat trembo and yessirskii," "derke left a big responsibility to fill"), sharing strong opinions about certain players and their capabilities.
They express disappointment with some teams or players, often comparing players to one another in a critical way (e.g., "shitmea dont stand no chance," "it would be disrespectful to the good duelists").
Esports Industry News and Criticism:
The user comments on esports industry issues like team management, player contracts, and decisions made by Riot Games, the creator of Valorant (e.g., "BREAKING: RIOT GAMES to introduce LUXURY TAX").
They also mock the esports industry, particularly Riot Games, by calling it a "small indie company" to emphasize what they perceive as poor management or oversight.
Gaming Community and Culture:
The user references various in-game experiences, strategies, and game elements specific to Valorant and its community, including different players’ roles and the impact of team chemistry.
Additionally, there are several references to anime and gaming tropes, showing a crossover between different online subcultures.
General Criticism and Mockery:
Several comments target people or groups, sometimes criticizing specific countries or gaming regions (e.g., "an EMEA team winning an EMEA event what a surprise").
There is also mockery of players' skill levels and a tendency to make sweeping negative statements (e.g., "another ilya terrorizing a region," "team sex offenders").
Interpersonal Interaction and Instigation:
Some comments seem meant to provoke or amuse others, often using playful insults and antagonistic humor. For instance, phrases like "yo wtf are you 12 kid?" and "bros tweaking the fuck out" seem designed to get a reaction.
They sometimes engage in lighthearted, albeit occasionally harsh, banter with other users, which may be typical in competitive gaming communities but could also alienate some users.
In summary, this user displays a blend of competitive and critical spirit characteristic of online gaming forums, but with a tendency toward toxicity. Their comments often mix humor with harsh critiques, mocking remarks, and sometimes offensive language, showing both their deep involvement in the gaming world and a confrontational approach to online interactions. They could be seen as a passionate but occasionally problematic member of the community.
The comments on the forum reflect a mixture of banter, competitive insights, light-hearted humor, and some more toxic or abrasive sentiments. Here is an analysis of the user who posted these comments, as well as a breakdown of the main points discussed:
Passionate and Knowledgeable: The user demonstrates a strong understanding of the esports scene, particularly in Valorant. Their comments indicate they follow specific players, teams, and recent events closely, suggesting they are deeply involved in the community.
Opinionated and Critical: The user doesn’t hold back in expressing dissatisfaction with certain players, analysts, and even aspects of the game’s meta. Their tone varies from constructive critique to outright criticism, with some comments bordering on toxicity.
Blunt and Sarcastic: There’s frequent use of sarcasm and humorous exaggeration, which is common in gaming forums. The user makes use of memes and humor but sometimes pushes boundaries, as seen with the targeted criticisms of players and fans.
Loyal to Certain Figures/Teams: The user seems loyal to particular analysts (e.g., Sliggy) and holds biases against others. This loyalty also extends to teams and players, and they sometimes criticize others based on perceived bias or lack of understanding.
Potentially Toxic: While some comments are light-hearted, others reflect a more toxic attitude. This is evident in personal jabs at certain fans or players and strong language against teams and regions, which might alienate other users.
Criticism of Game Decisions and Meta:
The user questions the logic behind certain in-game decisions, such as using a "Sova ult on an eco round." They also discuss the importance of the chamber meta and how it impacted the role of in-game leaders (IGLs).
They express a preference for strategic utility-based play over the "util bomb" style, suggesting they find the latter less engaging.
Opinions on Analysts and Biases:
The user criticizes TMV’s analysis, accusing him of having biases and pushing personal agendas, particularly against specific teams or fan bases. In contrast, they praise Sliggy and Sean Gares for being more educational and unbiased.
They discuss how analysts’ biases can detract from the viewer’s experience, especially if the analyst has a large following.
Comparative Player and Team Evaluations:
The user often compares players across teams, such as Aspas vs. Mada and Marved vs. Pancada, and discusses the evolving strength of teams like Loud.
They analyze how players would perform under different team compositions, frequently comparing players’ individual skills and potential impacts on teams.
General Toxicity and Stereotyping:
Some comments use disparaging language, such as “tiny ass LMAO” and regional stereotypes, which could be seen as unnecessary and potentially offensive. This reflects a tendency toward forum-style banter that can verge on offensive.
There’s also a clear us-versus-them attitude toward other teams or fans, particularly those perceived as “bandwagon” supporters.
Discussion of Esports Industry Issues:
The user mentions financial aspects of esports, like how teams might sustain revenue through merchandising and sponsorships, suggesting a broader awareness of the challenges in the esports industry.
They express respect for the hustle of esports teams, acknowledging how they must navigate a financially challenging industry.
Memes and Pop Culture References:
Their comment about “wear your gimp suit” and exaggerated comparisons reveal their alignment with common internet humor and meme culture, showing they are comfortable with the informal, sometimes edgy style of communication found in forums.
Support for Latin American and Brazilian Teams:
The user comments on regional esports events, expressing hope for more tournaments in Latin America and Brazil, showing a supportive stance for the development of these regions in Valorant.
They appear invested in the success of regions outside North America, mentioning specific players and calling attention to their potential.
The user is a dedicated but critical member of the esports community who enjoys engaging with detailed discussions about players, teams, and the game itself. While their insights are valuable, their tendency towards sarcastic humor and criticism can come across as dismissive or toxic. This behavior might appeal to some who enjoy banter and heated discussions but could alienate others who seek a more positive or supportive environment. Their comments reflect both a deep knowledge of Valorant and the complex dynamics of the gaming community.
Based on the comment analysis, this user seems to exhibit a range of characteristics and behaviors typical of an active and expressive participant in online gaming communities, especially around competitive esports. Below is an in-depth profile:
Passionate and Emotional: The user’s frequent expressions (e.g., “letsgoooooooooooooooooooooooo” and “lmao”) show a high level of enthusiasm and strong emotional investment in esports, especially Valorant.
Casual Toxicity: Although generally involved in friendly discussion, the user does show occasional hostility with statements like “shut up” and “stfu.” This indicates a tendency toward competitive or heated exchanges, which can come across as mildly toxic.
Frequent Usage of Slang and Abbreviations: Terms like “o7,” “W,” and “EZ” showcase familiarity with internet slang, particularly the language of competitive gaming and esports forums. This suggests the user is likely young and well-acquainted with online communities.
Multinational Awareness: References to multiple teams, players from various regions, and streamers from different countries (e.g., "German streamer" and "Cześć") indicate that the user has a broad awareness of the international esports scene.
Casual Humor and Self-Deprecation: The user occasionally exhibits humor, often at their own expense, like “am I dumb bc I cant See beff there or am i delusional,” showing they don’t take themselves too seriously.
The user engages in numerous conversations with a focus on various aspects of esports. Below are the key themes they discuss:
Match Predictions and Scores: The user frequently makes predictions on game outcomes, such as “Tyloo 2-1” or “Gen 2-0 DRX,” indicating an active interest in match results and tournament progress. This is typical of a fan who enjoys discussing competitive gaming.
Player and Team Critiques: There are several mentions of specific players’ performances (e.g., “Eg should Keep yay and drop sym He has good mechanics but there are better players”), indicating that the user feels knowledgeable enough to critique players and their skill levels.
Personal Gaming Experience: The user mentions their own gaming stats (“1300 hours” and “0.115 1600 dpi immortal 1”), which suggests they actively play and care about their own progress in the game. This aligns with the community aspect, as sharing one’s in-game performance is common on such forums.
Esports Management and Roster Decisions: Comments about team management decisions (e.g., “Why they dropped Gorilla He was good head coach”) show an interest in the organizational side of esports, not just the gameplay. This suggests the user is knowledgeable about industry moves and possibly follows player transfers and coaching changes.
Expressions of Frustration: The user occasionally expresses frustration, such as “i wantet to go pro so hard and know i just have no more movitivation bercause every team i was in got destroyed by internal problems.” This could indicate past experience in competitive gaming, possibly at an amateur level.
Miscellaneous and Pop Culture References: Mentions of songs like “afterglow by wilkingson” and anime references suggest that the user is integrated into a wider internet culture beyond esports. They seem to enjoy blending gaming discussions with cultural references.
The user appears to be a passionate esports enthusiast with a solid understanding of competitive gaming, team dynamics, and a vested interest in match predictions and player performance. While they exhibit moments of casual toxicity common in competitive online forums, their tone is mostly that of an excited and engaged community member. They seem to appreciate humor and self-expression, enjoy banter with other users, and sometimes seek validation or connection in the community (e.g., discussing their own gaming hours and asking for opinions).
This user would likely be viewed as a loyal, albeit occasionally abrasive, member of the gaming community—someone who enjoys both sharing their insights and engaging in spirited debates.
Discord