Ez for N MTA
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.41 1.54 | 256 241 270 | 21 9 12 | / 14 7 7 / | 4 0 4 | +7 +2 +5 | 82% 70% 92% | 172 172 172 | 50% 39% 59% | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.00 0.63 1.32 | 175 133 212 | 16 5 11 | / 15 8 7 / | 2 0 2 | +1 -3 +4 | 68% 50% 83% | 140 98 175 | 35% 38% 33% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.91 0.54 1.21 | 214 120 293 | 15 4 11 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 0 5 | -4 -5 +1 | 64% 40% 83% | 140 79 190 | 31% 44% 27% | 5 2 3 | 3 2 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.68 0.40 0.91 | 154 119 185 | 11 3 8 | / 18 9 9 / | 9 5 4 | -7 -6 -1 | 55% 40% 67% | 98 85 109 | 24% 18% 29% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.50 0.59 0.42 | 124 125 125 | 8 4 4 | / 18 8 10 / | 9 5 4 | -10 -4 -6 | 59% 60% 58% | 101 96 105 | 27% 44% 18% | 0 0 0 | 4 0 4 | -4 0 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 1.45 1.76 | 324 321 329 | 27 14 13 | / 14 10 4 / | 4 2 2 | +13 +4 +9 | 91% 92% 90% | 196 187 207 | 20% 25% 13% | 7 5 2 | 2 1 1 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.24 0.84 1.72 | 213 176 259 | 16 7 9 | / 12 9 3 / | 7 5 2 | +4 -2 +6 | 77% 67% 90% | 144 125 168 | 20% 13% 26% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.23 1.19 1.28 | 211 197 229 | 18 9 9 | / 13 8 5 / | 4 3 1 | +5 +1 +4 | 73% 67% 80% | 120 110 132 | 36% 50% 27% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.75 0.76 0.74 | 176 176 177 | 12 8 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 5 2 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 77% 75% 80% | 138 129 148 | 22% 20% 25% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.53 0.87 | 143 120 171 | 11 5 6 | / 16 10 6 / | 7 5 2 | -5 -5 0 | 77% 75% 80% | 102 95 109 | 21% 18% 24% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.13 1.19 | 200 205 194 | 49 26 23 | / 43 22 21 / | 22 5 17 | +6 +4 +2 | 74% 71% 78% | 131 134 128 | 40% 35% 45% | 8 4 4 | 2 1 1 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.15 1.20 1.18 | 227 233 226 | 59 28 31 | / 49 23 26 / | 14 6 8 | +10 +5 +5 | 76% 71% 81% | 162 165 159 | 32% 33% 30% | 5 3 2 | 3 1 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.63 1.21 0.92 | 178 130 226 | 46 14 32 | / 51 27 24 / | 22 13 9 | -5 -13 +8 | 70% 65% 75% | 113 87 138 | 20% 16% 23% | 5 1 4 | 6 4 2 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.69 1.04 0.87 | 171 140 204 | 42 16 26 | / 48 23 25 / | 20 10 10 | -6 -7 +1 | 63% 62% 64% | 116 94 136 | 29% 36% 26% | 5 1 4 | 9 3 6 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.71 1.03 0.87 | 201 172 229 | 46 21 25 | / 55 27 28 / | 17 4 13 | -9 -6 -3 | 70% 62% 78% | 138 128 148 | 30% 33% 28% | 16 7 9 | 12 9 3 | +4 -2 +6 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 1.17 1.18 | 248 258 233 | 65 35 30 | / 47 27 20 / | 9 5 4 | +18 +8 +10 | 70% 75% 65% | 149 153 145 | 20% 23% 16% | 15 8 7 | 12 7 5 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.85 1.35 1.09 | 192 165 222 | 48 20 28 | / 44 25 19 / | 22 9 13 | +4 -5 +9 | 66% 56% 76% | 122 101 144 | 30% 45% 23% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.96 0.94 0.95 | 197 215 183 | 46 26 20 | / 51 29 22 / | 28 12 16 | -5 -3 -2 | 77% 81% 74% | 128 139 117 | 28% 29% 27% | 3 1 2 | 7 2 5 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.64 1.23 0.92 | 186 151 223 | 41 16 25 | / 49 28 21 / | 34 18 16 | -8 -12 +4 | 71% 61% 82% | 129 105 155 | 19% 13% 24% | 6 2 4 | 7 5 2 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.80 0.96 0.88 | 193 205 182 | 45 26 19 | / 51 29 22 / | 10 4 6 | -6 -3 -3 | 70% 72% 68% | 139 134 143 | 22% 25% 19% | 5 2 3 | 10 8 2 | -5 -6 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 2.01 0.91 | 300 405 196 | 25 17 8 | / 17 6 11 / | 7 4 3 | +8 +11 -3 | 88% 100% 75% | 196 266 126 | 35% 36% 33% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.28 0.74 1.83 | 223 132 314 | 22 6 16 | / 15 8 7 / | 3 2 1 | +7 -2 +9 | 79% 75% 83% | 133 77 188 | 20% 16% 22% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.95 0.94 0.97 | 171 145 199 | 15 6 9 | / 14 5 9 / | 4 3 1 | +1 +1 0 | 63% 67% 58% | 109 91 126 | 28% 31% 27% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.88 0.98 0.78 | 126 136 118 | 11 7 4 | / 14 6 8 / | 7 2 5 | -3 +1 -4 | 75% 83% 67% | 91 90 92 | 33% 42% 27% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.86 0.95 0.76 | 191 199 184 | 15 9 6 | / 18 7 11 / | 8 4 4 | -3 +2 -5 | 71% 83% 58% | 145 172 119 | 24% 23% 25% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 0.99 1.16 | 244 287 202 | 20 12 8 | / 19 11 8 / | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | 63% 83% 42% | 171 169 173 | 19% 26% 14% | 2 2 0 | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.03 1.09 0.96 | 238 249 228 | 18 10 8 | / 19 9 10 / | 9 3 6 | -1 +1 -2 | 71% 83% 58% | 156 154 158 | 27% 22% 32% | 2 1 1 | 3 0 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.00 1.40 0.59 | 190 267 115 | 18 13 5 | / 16 7 9 / | 2 2 0 | +2 +6 -4 | 58% 75% 42% | 127 171 83 | 21% 18% 31% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.86 0.49 1.24 | 151 124 180 | 13 5 8 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 2 7 | -3 -3 0 | 58% 50% 67% | 99 74 124 | 29% 33% 26% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.53 0.48 0.59 | 127 140 115 | 8 5 3 | / 18 9 9 / | 7 3 4 | -10 -4 -6 | 67% 58% 75% | 97 101 93 | 16% 13% 20% | 4 2 2 | 5 3 2 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 1.36 1.08 | 219 243 196 | 17 10 7 | / 15 9 6 / | 11 3 8 | +2 +1 +1 | 67% 58% 75% | 133 147 119 | 35% 30% 42% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.14 0.54 1.74 | 217 147 287 | 19 6 13 | / 16 10 6 / | 7 2 5 | +3 -4 +7 | 67% 58% 75% | 136 95 178 | 32% 36% 30% | 2 0 2 | 4 3 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
1.05 0.73 1.37 | 206 145 269 | 18 6 12 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 2 3 | +1 -3 +4 | 71% 58% 83% | 149 121 178 | 26% 26% 26% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.86 0.61 1.11 | 199 189 211 | 16 8 8 | / 18 11 7 / | 4 0 4 | -2 -3 +1 | 75% 58% 92% | 130 126 135 | 39% 42% 35% | 7 2 5 | 4 4 0 | +3 -2 +5 | |
|
0.79 0.70 0.88 | 157 137 179 | 13 5 8 | / 18 10 8 / | 10 6 4 | -5 -5 0 | 75% 75% 75% | 108 99 118 | 18% 14% 21% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 0.87 1.52 | 215 173 257 | 17 6 11 | / 15 9 6 / | 9 4 5 | +2 -3 +5 | 67% 50% 83% | 147 119 174 | 27% 50% 17% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.11 1.25 0.98 | 211 277 147 | 17 11 6 | / 16 10 6 / | 12 4 8 | +1 +1 0 | 83% 83% 83% | 125 168 81 | 36% 45% 22% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.03 0.59 1.46 | 219 137 301 | 17 4 13 | / 19 10 9 / | 20 10 10 | -2 -6 +4 | 71% 58% 83% | 148 90 207 | 21% 13% 26% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.99 0.74 1.25 | 229 187 272 | 20 8 12 | / 17 10 7 / | 3 1 2 | +3 -2 +5 | 63% 58% 67% | 129 103 155 | 19% 31% 13% | 7 3 4 | 7 4 3 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.80 0.64 0.95 | 159 154 165 | 13 6 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 2 0 2 | -3 -3 0 | 71% 58% 83% | 106 103 109 | 26% 32% 22% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 |
Wdym sen played better than any americas team this year?? They quite literally played worse than Lev (Objectively by points), G2 and you could argue also better than 100 memes.
Sen won kickoff, a tournament that had a competitive NRG Team, LOUD finished 2nd because they beat EG. Masters Madrid also didnt see the best teams in their best shapes from other regions. Paper Rex was 3rd there when they looked awful, the only competitive team there (and respect to sen for winning) was GENG.
100T beat sen when it mattered and g2 is looking better than ever. If you want to weigh the 2 least important tournaments equally to stage 1 & 2 and Shanghai, only then were sen better than everyone except lev.
100T did well stage 1 and won that, top 6 in Shanghai vs SEN won kickoff, did well stage 2 and Madrid. So imo the format is ass and SEN 100% deserves to go to champs more they did way more than 100T this year. You can't tell me any other Americas team performed better than SEN this year, stage 1 yes but other than that SEN are a solid top 4 team and thats why they are in champs. The champ point system is trash though, winning Madrid should of been at least 5 points. They won 2 grand finals and just barely made champs with a 6-4 record is wild.
Again, Sen won kickoff where everybody was trash (like bro the top 4 were eg nrg and loud they all didnt even make it to the top 6 in americas),
Sen won Madrid were only Geng was good it was basically a 2 team tournament. China as a region was awful, emea was awful, paper rex was awful and loud were awful.
Sen got 6 points where where there was almost no competition.
And STILL lev has more points than them. How in the world was sen the best team in americas? Certainly didnt see sen going on a 9 game winstreak in the group stage games.
Lev lost to c9, rethought their entire approach and won against every other team in the region, INCLUDING SEN(?!)
Also 5 points for madrid would be mental
Thats just dumb logic, they were the best team after Madrid just because other teams improved since doesn't mean SEN isn't better, thats how competition works . Current SEN isn't the best team in Americas, I said they deserved to be in champions for their performance this year because no other Americas team did as much as them this year.
I think we have different understanding on performance, im not talking about just Americas league, im talking about everything kickoff, madrid, stage 1+2 and they have accomplished the most out of all the Americas team is what I mean. Its my fault I worded wrong so you misunderstood when I say "better than any Americas team this year" I meant they accomplished more this year than any other Americas team.
100T not beating the allegations and it shows. I don't think all their contracts will be renewed for 2025-2026. After winnings stage 1, everyone's saying it's the 100T Era and they're gonna smash Masters Shanghai, Kekw. After Shanghai, they said they're gonna dominate Stage 2. It shows there was never an era to begin with. The 100T fell off should be studied. This is as masterclass (11-7) KekW gaming from them.