Sen 2-1 prx
Loud 2-1 prx
(jinx worked) ezzzzzz
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.04 1.83 | 261 163 361 | 22 7 15 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 2 4 | +8 -1 +9 | 79% 67% 92% | 156 120 192 | 19% 27% 17% | 7 2 5 | 1 1 0 | +6 +1 +5 | |
|
1.17 1.10 1.24 | 210 196 226 | 17 8 9 | / 14 7 7 / | 7 3 4 | +3 +1 +2 | 75% 58% 92% | 133 117 149 | 30% 43% 24% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.01 0.71 1.30 | 204 175 234 | 19 8 11 | / 19 11 8 / | 7 3 4 | 0 -3 +3 | 71% 58% 83% | 128 93 163 | 32% 35% 30% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.79 0.84 0.73 | 176 207 146 | 13 9 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 10 3 7 | -4 0 -4 | 75% 67% 83% | 122 122 123 | 13% 11% 15% | 2 2 0 | 5 4 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.79 0.56 1.02 | 150 122 179 | 13 5 8 | / 17 9 8 / | 6 3 3 | -4 -4 0 | 58% 58% 58% | 110 110 110 | 39% 50% 33% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 1.40 1.38 | 225 212 240 | 20 10 10 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 2 4 | +6 +3 +3 | 79% 67% 92% | 144 132 156 | 32% 21% 47% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.00 0.48 1.52 | 206 101 312 | 18 5 13 | / 19 10 9 / | 5 2 3 | -1 -5 +4 | 67% 50% 83% | 128 72 185 | 17% 12% 19% | 4 0 4 | 1 1 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.93 1.42 0.43 | 184 255 114 | 16 12 4 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 4 3 | -1 +4 -5 | 71% 67% 75% | 145 199 91 | 28% 26% 36% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.82 0.79 0.86 | 163 160 167 | 12 6 6 | / 17 10 7 / | 9 7 2 | -5 -4 -1 | 63% 67% 58% | 110 103 117 | 14% 25% 10% | 1 1 0 | 5 3 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.73 0.03 1.46 | 166 113 220 | 15 4 11 | / 17 12 5 / | 4 3 1 | -2 -8 +6 | 58% 33% 83% | 120 78 162 | 31% 24% 39% | 1 0 1 | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.48 1.46 | 269 239 295 | 44 19 25 | / 27 12 15 / | 13 4 9 | +17 +7 +10 | 78% 76% 79% | 167 172 163 | 25% 26% 24% | 7 2 5 | 2 1 1 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
1.13 1.02 1.07 | 226 228 223 | 34 17 17 | / 31 13 18 / | 18 7 11 | +3 +4 -1 | 71% 71% 71% | 142 134 150 | 27% 30% 25% | 9 4 5 | 2 0 2 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
0.94 1.04 0.99 | 184 193 173 | 31 16 15 | / 29 14 15 / | 9 5 4 | +2 +2 0 | 67% 71% 63% | 122 140 106 | 38% 40% 36% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.53 1.28 0.93 | 182 138 225 | 30 10 20 | / 34 19 15 / | 22 11 11 | -4 -9 +5 | 76% 71% 79% | 118 70 161 | 23% 21% 24% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.80 0.89 | 179 201 160 | 27 15 12 | / 32 14 18 / | 17 8 9 | -5 +1 -6 | 71% 71% 71% | 119 124 115 | 19% 17% 21% | 7 4 3 | 7 5 2 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.18 1.20 1.19 | 209 195 228 | 36 19 17 | / 31 16 15 / | 9 5 4 | +5 +3 +2 | 76% 67% 86% | 128 116 142 | 31% 24% 40% | 4 1 3 | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.94 1.43 1.17 | 255 186 327 | 40 17 23 | / 35 17 18 / | 11 6 5 | +5 0 +5 | 67% 63% 71% | 156 118 198 | 24% 26% 23% | 6 2 4 | 5 3 2 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.58 0.61 1.12 | 228 310 130 | 37 28 9 | / 31 15 16 / | 13 8 5 | +6 +13 -7 | 71% 79% 62% | 160 207 106 | 33% 28% 50% | 2 2 0 | 6 3 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.75 0.58 0.67 | 139 143 139 | 19 10 9 | / 34 18 16 / | 17 13 4 | -15 -8 -7 | 62% 71% 52% | 97 100 93 | 13% 19% 9% | 2 2 0 | 8 4 4 | -6 -2 -4 | |
|
0.11 1.12 0.57 | 138 103 183 | 21 7 14 | / 35 23 12 / | 11 5 6 | -14 -16 +2 | 62% 50% 76% | 103 73 136 | 31% 29% 32% | 2 0 2 | 7 6 1 | -5 -6 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.95 1.13 | 277 341 229 | 22 12 10 | / 13 4 9 / | 7 2 5 | +9 +8 +1 | 76% 89% 67% | 180 242 134 | 30% 26% 38% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.22 1.44 1.06 | 218 289 166 | 18 11 7 | / 12 5 7 / | 3 2 1 | +6 +6 0 | 76% 89% 67% | 135 180 101 | 37% 35% 40% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.01 1.21 0.86 | 182 193 175 | 14 6 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 7 5 2 | -1 +1 -2 | 67% 78% 58% | 115 127 107 | 28% 24% 32% | 5 2 3 | 2 1 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.96 1.18 0.80 | 241 269 221 | 17 9 8 | / 17 6 11 / | 11 4 7 | 0 +3 -3 | 67% 89% 50% | 154 158 150 | 24% 22% 26% | 5 3 2 | 2 0 2 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.84 0.28 1.26 | 160 89 215 | 11 2 9 | / 15 8 7 / | 15 8 7 | -4 -6 +2 | 81% 89% 75% | 108 39 159 | 13% 0% 19% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 1.40 1.31 | 303 271 348 | 22 12 10 | / 16 7 9 / | 6 4 2 | +6 +5 +1 | 67% 75% 56% | 187 165 217 | 32% 36% 28% | 2 2 0 | 4 2 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.35 1.73 0.84 | 272 364 150 | 21 16 5 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 4 2 | +7 +9 -2 | 71% 92% 44% | 177 215 126 | 40% 31% 64% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.96 0.96 0.96 | 192 177 212 | 16 9 7 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 3 0 | -1 0 -1 | 71% 67% 78% | 110 100 124 | 30% 29% 31% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.50 0.71 0.22 | 115 126 103 | 7 4 3 | / 17 8 9 / | 8 6 2 | -10 -4 -6 | 62% 75% 44% | 82 98 62 | 11% 14% 6% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.39 0.18 0.68 | 110 93 134 | 6 3 3 | / 18 11 7 / | 7 2 5 | -12 -8 -4 | 67% 67% 67% | 83 68 102 | 31% 38% 23% | 1 0 1 | 3 3 0 | -2 -3 +1 |
Hisore [#15]L prediction
loud should have won though ngl. They played way better then sen on that last map
Zerphyr1 [#32]loud should have won though ngl. They played way better then sen on that last map
LOUD experience is too much, LOUD 2-1 PRX
SENBobstar [#33]LOUD experience is too much, LOUD 2-1 PRX
Bro you can't be pulling experience card against prx other than sadhak they have 3 players that attended the most lans at this event
douradoxp [#12]close game, can go either way
Braindead rush simulator is undefeated against your team
ChronoWasTaken [#22]Paper Rex is gonna get crushed, they barely beat 2 EU frauds to get here.
The top 3 is so clear, it's an easy 2-0 for Loud; can we please get back to the actual tournament?
you mean the tournament NRG couldn't qualify to?
Astar [#25]there is no way prx will win this. but they're known to defy expectations so..
No way they win this...right?????????
Zerphyr1 [#32]loud should have won though ngl. They played way better then sen on that last map
If they played better than why didn't they win
JustARandomDood [#44]If they played better than why didn't they win
becauase factors like luck and randomness play a role in valorant so sometimes a team that plays better will still lose due to some uncontrollable factors or bad luck.
For example if a team loses 12-14 but 12 of the rounds that they won were all flawless rounds, and they lost to a team which won all 14 of their rounds through clutches, in this example it would be quite obvious that the team who lost did in-fact play better.
there are many more examples of situations like this but my point is that your argument is fallacious
DrudaL [#10]Jingg is not here to carry, prx need to fix their comps or its just bye bye
i still think that if they just put monyet on smokes or cypher and forsaken on the duelist role they would win hands down but yeah they should also improve their comps a little liek they did with they're 3 duelist split comp.
Zerphyr1 [#32]loud should have won though ngl. They played way better then sen on that last map
No they didnβt
Double pistol + won force and still lost
SEN were better
Asuna_Yuuki [#62]No they didnβt
Double pistol + won force and still lost
SEN were better
loud just lost their clutches.
loud lost 12-14 but sen won 7 clutches and loud only won 2
Zerphyr1 [#63]loud just lost their clutches.
loud lost 12-14 but sen won 7 clutches and loud only won 2
so they canβt win an advantageous round and we are calling them better? youβre trolling surely
loloscum [#90]Why did loud tried to fight without util on top of a sage slow
maybe they lost their logic on this one bro? xD
ChronoWasTaken [#22]Paper Rex is gonna get crushed, they barely beat 2 EU frauds to get here.
The top 3 is so clear, it's an easy 2-0 for Loud; can we please get back to the actual tournament?
good game fraudmericas
Mangal [#91]maybe they lost their logic on this one bro? xD
Today im totally on your side, Loud tried to win based on aim and no brain. Against sentinels its another story though, i still think they had good strategies and even FNS said so
ChronoWasTaken [#22]Paper Rex is gonna get crushed, they barely beat 2 EU frauds to get here.
The top 3 is so clear, it's an easy 2-0 for Loud; can we please get back to the actual tournament?
nt
ChronoWasTaken [#22]Paper Rex is gonna get crushed, they barely beat 2 EU frauds to get here.
The top 3 is so clear, it's an easy 2-0 for Loud; can we please get back to the actual tournament?
Near airport
Zerphyr1 [#63]loud just lost their clutches.
loud lost 12-14 but sen won 7 clutches and loud only won 2
Sounds like Loud canβt win with numbers in clutch situations. I smell hypocrisy.
Hyssopus1 [#28]this game even i being a hater of that org i will cheer for loud, this aura of #Wgaming and all that cringe shit is just pathetic, hopefully loud 2-0.
Eww pathetic region
Zerphyr1 [#63]loud just lost their clutches.
loud lost 12-14 but sen won 7 clutches and loud only won 2
prx fan but can't even have faith in them? loud only beat the chinese teams lol. ur sad. prx will beat sen too.
Kazotie [#115]Sounds like Loud canβt win with numbers in clutch situations. I smell hypocrisy.
5 of them were straight up 1v1s.
not sure how you think winning off clutches makes you a better team
BigBrainf [#98]first sen and prx tag teamed to take out eu, now they tag teamed to take out brazil
better take: GENG and PRX now will both take down NA in playoffs
DrudaL [#10]Jingg is not here to carry, prx need to fix their comps or its just bye bye
something oping and monyet smokes is all they need
AirSFMMDJ [#51]QCK is actually good, Monyet is uhhh
damn what happened to qck, he went worse than monyet LMAO
Sydrom [#65]LOUD 2- 1 PAPER REX
But i hope Paper Rex 2-0, the results now its depends on Monyet not just give 20% contribution, but give more contributions
yess its Paper Rex 2-0
kAED [#132]Still waiting for monyet to have a positive match lmao
And they still managed to reach all the way to the top 3.
douradoxp [#12]close game, can go either way
Weβre actually shameless now? Stand behind your opinion dog, then sit and bark for us