If SEN doesn't get knocked to the lower brackets then this is SEN vs ENVY or 100T vs ENVY
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
9
11
-2
|
6
6
+0
|
9
8
+1
|
9
9
+0
|
9
8
+1
|
zombs
SEN
|
12
12
+0
|
7
5
+2
|
8
10
-2
|
7
8
-1
|
4
7
-3
|
dapr
SEN
|
12
10
+2
|
7
4
+3
|
7
8
-1
|
8
9
-1
|
10
12
-2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
10
12
-2
|
12
3
+9
|
5
8
-3
|
6
10
-4
|
4
8
-4
|
SicK
SEN
|
9
9
+0
|
10
7
+3
|
8
9
-1
|
10
7
+3
|
7
10
-3
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
4
-3
|
|
1
3
-2
|
4
3
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
zombs
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
6
-4
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
0
+2
|
3
0
+3
|
0
1
-1
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
3
0
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
11
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
2
|
2
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
3
|
3
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
44
|
2
|
3
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
6
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
5
|
1
|
xeta
C9
|
|
8
|
3
|
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
65
|
7
|
3
|
mitch
C9
|
|
13
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
54
|
4
|
2
|
poiz
C9
|
|
7
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
1
|
leaf
C9
|
|
10
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
1
|
floppy
C9
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
8
|
0
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
4
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
4
3
+1
|
5
3
+2
|
3
3
+0
|
zombs
SEN
|
6
5
+1
|
3
3
+0
|
5
3
+2
|
3
3
+0
|
2
2
+0
|
dapr
SEN
|
4
6
-2
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
2
2
+0
|
5
3
+2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
5
3
+2
|
4
1
+3
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
4
-1
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
5
-2
|
7
4
+3
|
3
3
+0
|
4
1
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
dapr
SEN
|
1
2
-1
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
Round 11
poiz
xeta
Round 22
poiz
mitch
|
|
1
Round 24
leaf
poiz
floppy
mitch
|
1
Round 1
mitch
leaf
xeta
poiz
floppy
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
2
|
1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
2
Round 4
floppy
mitch
Round 9
poiz
mitch
|
|
|
1
Round 8
mitch
leaf
xeta
floppy
poiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
2
|
1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
Round 7
leaf
poiz
|
2
Round 17
leaf
floppy
xeta
Round 23
poiz
floppy
mitch
|
1
Round 5
floppy
mitch
poiz
leaf
|
|
|
|
1
Round 23
mitch
poiz
floppy
|
|
|
59
|
1
|
2
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
4
Round 4
leaf
poiz
Round 6
xeta
poiz
Round 7
mitch
floppy
Round 12
leaf
mitch
|
1
Round 10
mitch
floppy
poiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
2
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 2
leaf
poiz
Round 9
floppy
leaf
Round 18
floppy
xeta
|
1
Round 13
floppy
xeta
poiz
|
|
|
1
Round 9
leaf
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
2
|
1
|
xeta
C9
|
|
4
Round 3
TenZ
SicK
Round 10
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 16
dapr
SicK
Round 19
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
1
Round 12
zombs
|
1
Round 10
zombs
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
67
|
3
|
2
|
mitch
C9
|
|
5
Round 13
TenZ
dapr
Round 14
ShahZaM
TenZ
Round 15
SicK
TenZ
Round 19
SicK
zombs
Round 23
dapr
zombs
|
|
|
|
1
Round 13
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
0
|
1
|
poiz
C9
|
|
1
Round 1
dapr
zombs
|
|
|
|
1
Round 17
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
0
|
1
|
leaf
C9
|
|
4
Round 5
SicK
dapr
Round 14
SicK
dapr
Round 20
ShahZaM
zombs
Round 21
dapr
zombs
|
2
Round 12
TenZ
dapr
SicK
Round 17
SicK
zombs
TenZ
|
1
Round 9
ShahZaM
zombs
SicK
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
0
|
1
|
floppy
C9
|
|
1
Round 21
SicK
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
4
|
0
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
2
5
-3
|
1
1
+0
|
1
4
-3
|
1
1
+0
|
1
4
-3
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
5
-5
|
0
0
|
1
2
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
1
3
-2
|
dapr
SEN
|
5
1
+4
|
1
1
+0
|
0
5
-5
|
2
5
-3
|
3
3
+0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
3
-1
|
3
1
+2
|
1
2
-1
|
1
5
-4
|
0
2
-2
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
1
5
-4
|
1
2
-1
|
0
3
-3
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
0
4
-4
|
|
0
2
-2
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
0
0
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
0
0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
Round 7
leaf
floppy
Round 9
poiz
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
1
Round 11
leaf
poiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
1
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
Round 9
leaf
mitch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
1
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
1
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 3
leaf
xeta
Round 6
leaf
floppy
Round 8
leaf
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
xeta
C9
|
|
2
Round 8
TenZ
zombs
Round 13
dapr
TenZ
|
1
Round 6
dapr
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
|
1
Round 12
ShahZaM
TenZ
SicK
zombs
dapr
|
2
Round 5
SicK
Round 7
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
2
|
1
|
mitch
C9
|
|
6
Round 1
TenZ
zombs
Round 3
dapr
ShahZaM
Round 4
zombs
SicK
Round 7
dapr
TenZ
Round 9
TenZ
dapr
Round 11
dapr
SicK
|
1
Round 2
TenZ
SicK
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
1
Round 3
dapr
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
81
|
0
|
1
|
poiz
C9
|
|
3
Round 6
zombs
dapr
Round 13
ShahZaM
zombs
Round 14
dapr
ShahZaM
|
2
Round 1
SicK
ShahZaM
dapr
Round 11
TenZ
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
0
|
0
|
leaf
C9
|
|
3
Round 2
zombs
dapr
Round 3
TenZ
zombs
Round 5
TenZ
zombs
|
2
Round 10
TenZ
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 14
TenZ
SicK
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
0
|
0
|
floppy
C9
|
|
1
Round 8
ShahZaM
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
0
|
0
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
3
2
+1
|
2
2
+0
|
4
1
+3
|
3
5
-2
|
5
1
+4
|
zombs
SEN
|
6
2
+4
|
4
2
+2
|
2
5
-3
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
dapr
SEN
|
3
3
+0
|
3
0
+3
|
4
0
+4
|
4
2
+2
|
2
6
-4
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
3
6
-3
|
5
1
+4
|
1
3
-2
|
2
2
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
SicK
SEN
|
4
2
+2
|
2
1
+1
|
4
1
+3
|
5
4
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
0
+2
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
4
-3
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
leaf
C9
|
floppy
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
poiz
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
3
0
+3
|
2
0
+2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
7
Round 3
poiz
floppy
Round 4
poiz
mitch
Round 5
mitch
floppy
Round 9
xeta
mitch
Round 12
poiz
leaf
Round 14
xeta
mitch
Round 16
xeta
leaf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
0
|
1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
5
Round 1
poiz
mitch
Round 2
mitch
poiz
Round 10
leaf
xeta
Round 13
leaf
floppy
Round 18
poiz
xeta
|
1
Round 17
leaf
mitch
poiz
|
|
|
1
Round 4
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
0
|
2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
Round 5
leaf
poiz
|
2
Round 6
leaf
floppy
leaf
Round 17
floppy
floppy
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
0
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
3
Round 15
poiz
leaf
Round 18
leaf
mitch
Round 19
leaf
xeta
|
|
|
|
1
Round 19
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
3
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 10
poiz
mitch
Round 14
leaf
poiz
Round 19
mitch
poiz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
3
|
0
|
xeta
C9
|
|
2
Round 2
zombs
SicK
Round 19
dapr
SicK
|
2
Round 1
ShahZaM
dapr
SicK
Round 6
zombs
dapr
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
2
|
0
|
mitch
C9
|
|
2
Round 4
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 9
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
4
|
0
|
poiz
C9
|
|
3
Round 11
ShahZaM
dapr
Round 12
TenZ
zombs
Round 17
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
1
Round 8
SicK
TenZ
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
0
|
0
|
leaf
C9
|
|
3
Round 1
TenZ
zombs
Round 7
ShahZaM
dapr
Round 11
TenZ
SicK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
0
|
0
|
floppy
C9
|
|
1
Round 18
TenZ
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
4
|
0
|
Exactly not saying SEN doesn't lose but when it matters most NA teams just choke in high pressure. Games become super one sided sometimes and its boring to watch. I thought 100T was similar to SEN but in the end I see that it hasn't changed. I hope C9 proves me wrong and at least be competitive. I see EU games and they're super close till last moment.
I think my eyes need medical attention rn. I dont know why it is so bad. I mean not individually, they are all great players and I would definetely enjoy watching frag movie from that game. But utility, composition, team coordination is just nowhere to be found.
Its really feels like Im watching multi-stream from random radiant game
When SEN lose a map, they always lose big. I think they just give up once they know they are losing for certain and just hide their strat, and move mentally quickly to the next game. Trust me when I say SEN will now wipe C9 on Icebox now since their mental is reset during the Split game, not after.
edit: told y'all LMAO
I don't think any region will necessarily destroy the other, it's gonna come down to matchups ultimately. Where I think SEN can benefit is 1) they will have a lot of VOD on their opponents who also had to go through Challengers in other regions and 2) they don't have a recognizable style of play they absolutely try to stick to. Take the 13-1 on Split, ShahZam just said in the interview that they already feel like they have the answer to crack the defense the next time they play C9. I wouldn't be shocked to see completely different agent lineups from them in Iceland as they constantly are reinventing themselves.
The thing is, SEN doesn't change lineup-wise often, in this tournament for example, they've run the same comp on every map they've played, which makes sense, because the tournament is so short. But in general this holds true for all other tournaments, except challengers 2. The main reason for those changes aren't really fundamental beyond the macro switch to the Viper/Astra. Zombs is carrying them hard in this regard, playing both the Astra and the Viper(dapr picks it up for bind).
They change their playstyle and timings. The way they read and dismantle teams are largely in that realm. That's why I think EU should be worried on one part. But on the other hand, this is true for pretty much every EU team; watching VOD's and figuring the opponent out, antistratting etc...
Generally whenever regions clash in a new esport, it's rarely very close. Some regions may get pumped up, because they only play amongst themselves and get exposed in internationals. I feel like this was the case for Turkey in EMEA and could be the case for NA in Iceland. But you never know, Sentinels look good and they could just literally be better, than Liquid/Fnatic.
Sentinels wins Haven with some kinda-lucky cluthes.
Gets destroyed on the second map.
Wins the third.
But what if Shahzam could not clutch at 11-11 and they lost Haven, and they got demolished on the second map? This could have been very heartbreaking, and could have happened against 100T.
I think SEN is in a really good point right now, everybody on the team pops off. But they need to fix those problems that they have(I don't know what it is actually) to survive at masters event.