It is worth questioning what evidence supports the notion that Itopata is an effective coach.
2023: He coached APEKS, a team that lost in the finals of ascension against M8s, a team that performed abysmally in t1 that won ascension relying on individual performances.
2024: Working alongside Goked, his team struggled with a poor performance in Kickoff and a decent Split 1, which can be solely attributed to individual players, as their actual strats were destitute and their wins were commonly due to individual players popping off. Their performance at Shanghai was similarly poor, which led to head coach Goked being let go.
Later in 2024, with Juvenille coaching by his side, the team saw a notable improvement in Split 2, finishing 3rd at Champions.
However, attributing this success to Itopata remains challenging due to the lack of transparency regarding the division of coaching responsibilities. To gain perspective, it is useful to assess the subsequent performance of the coaches he collaborated with:
Goked is currently leading M8, a team that had a solid kickoff and is performing exceptionally well in Split 1, demonstrating well-developed strategies and fundamentals, upsetting the former 2nd best EMEA team, Team Liquid, in a very convincing manner.
Juvinille is now coaching GE, who faced a difficult kickoff due to the need for an emergency substitute. Nevertheless, their Split 1 performance has been remarkable, with with great strategies and strong fundamentals.
In contrast, Itopata's 2025 record:
Kickoff: The team managed a single victory against Furia, who were severely disadvantaged after arriving from Brazil just eight hours before the match and at the time were the 2nd worst team in the region.
Split 1: The team's performance has been abysmal, with ineffective strategies, seemingly horrible player management and agent picks, and results placing them among the weakest across all four regions.
TLDR: He is part of the 70%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk2m1uxR-eM