Iron - bronze = Freelo
Silver - plat = Low elo
Diamond - low immo = mid elo
High immo+ (300-400 rr) = high elo
I dont want to hear any Immo 1s cry down below
thats fair but honestly ascendant 1 then its when high elo starts
and this is coming from a guy who peaked rad btw
high elo isnt defined just by how good players are compared to you, you have to take in how good they are compared to every single person who has played valorant
if u take a diamond player and put them in bronze lobbies they are all dropping 40
you are high elo if u look at the whole playerbase and compare urself to every single valorant player, you are miles better than like at least 95% of all players. I would say thats high elo. Maybe to a pro player ascendant is like easy pickings so they would say its low elo. Just because u arent better than others does not mean that you guys are low elo, its just the floor of the high elo range
diamond and low immo being grouped in the same category is a crime LMFAOOo
diamond is literally just all aim no brain, no teamwork, no game iq, comps literally dont mean jack shit
Low immo people are atleast trying to work together to win
everyone is good enough to be flexible and comps ACTUALLY MATTER
it is a complete throw not having a senti in low immo lobbies, whereas in diamond you can get away with it so easily
the skill diff is wayyy too apparent to be grouping them in the same category
i hovered around diamond/ascendant for multiple episodes and had many games with an immo1 in it, and almost every time the immo1 performed about the same level if not worse than the rest of the lobby, so i agree
the low immos also tend to be more toxic because they're low immo and think they own the server
In lol it was basically :
We don't have threshold in Val sadfully, but we can transpose the percent in each categories, if we transpose that repartition to Val we have :