lol
do yall really think so?
why cant val players admit that val atm is as good as cs t3/t2? most val pros prefer cs and they just play val because they failed in cs
its not that deep
if tenz had the choice to be t1 cs or t1 valorant, u can be sure he would be pro in cs
0
"zywoo wouldnt be t1 in val"
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
yeah he wouldn't jump into val and beat sentinels, however, the fundamentals are the same. the games are similar enough that the skill ceiling of a player in one game will be pretty similar to his skill ceiling in the other game granted he grinded the same amount both quality-wise and quantity-wise
fighting games are similar, and players jump from one game to another and own in both because they're good fundamentally, however, val frogs think it's not the same in valorant
i don't get it, it's like watching watching futsal and thinking ronaldo wouldn't own in futsal, when the futsal's talent pool is visibly worse than football's talent pool, just like in cs/val
do you really think t2/t3 veterans got good out of nowhere? nah, there's a reason players like sick zellsis and whatever na player played in t2 for so long
so no idea why val frogs cope that hard
He probably would.
People overestimate how easy it is to adjust to valorant from CS, if you've spent 20k+ hours in one game.
A couple months of spamming the game to adjust, and he's easily be at tier 1 level.
People genuinly overestimating the complexity of valorant. We're not talking about a random gold nova swapping. We're talking about probably the most naturally gifted CS player of all time.
for real.
they think the strategical complexity of valorant is big, however, in the end, it's literally whoever has the better aim, timing, positioning, and all the tac-fps fundamentals that are very hard to measure, it's complex, but not in the way they think. sort of like sports like basketball and football
the strategical depth of valorant (and to be honest, from most videogames) is not that deep, it's not chess. it's a game of knowing which tool beats another tool given a situation and most of the time the decisions a player can take aren't that many
it's why coaches know how to set up good strats but they can't get out of ascendant
People forget KennyS played val for like 2 months and hit radiant. This is one of the most washed t1 players at the time. Xaccurate swapped, and is playing in tier1.
Valorant isn't some hyper complex game. It just takes some adjusting, and if you're playing 8hours a day. You'd adjust in a couple months. Especially if you're the top 0.001% in a similar title.
It isn't just because it's young.
It's because CS is so similar and shares the exact same fundamentals. Adjusting to abilities just takes getting used to.
People forget that aim and core mechanics can easily get people into high imm/rad, and then once you're fully used to the game flow, going into comp isn't hard. Especially if we're talking about people who've been competing for years, at a high level.
It's why xaccurate spent a few months just grinding ranked. Joined a t1 team.
cs mechanics arent the same as val. cs incentivizes spraying, while val you literally just cant spray consistently. also, movement and the new world of utility will be completely different. also, zywoo will have to switch to rifling, or occasionally awp. In cs you always awp on ct and t, val is way diff,
Discord