MxM 2-1 M80
Lotus 9-13
Haven 13-7
Pearl 13-10
thief goes bananas
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.63 1.32 | 272 308 241 | 22 12 10 | / 15 7 8 / | 15 11 4 | +7 +5 +2 | 74% 91% 58% | 169 210 131 | 24% 23% 26% | 5 2 3 | 1 0 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.26 1.60 0.95 | 217 224 212 | 19 10 9 | / 13 3 10 / | 7 4 3 | +6 +7 -1 | 96% 100% 92% | 157 147 166 | 21% 21% 21% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.11 1.14 1.07 | 180 174 187 | 17 8 9 | / 13 4 9 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +4 0 | 78% 82% 75% | 128 115 139 | 25% 15% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.10 1.32 0.90 | 180 174 186 | 15 8 7 | / 14 4 10 / | 15 7 8 | +1 +4 -3 | 83% 91% 75% | 136 147 126 | 43% 42% 44% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.03 1.44 0.65 | 236 329 151 | 18 13 5 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 3 4 | +2 +7 -5 | 70% 82% 58% | 174 232 120 | 30% 39% 22% | 7 5 2 | 3 1 2 | +4 +4 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 1.17 1.04 | 221 254 185 | 18 12 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 4 1 3 | 0 +4 -4 | 74% 75% 73% | 159 167 150 | 47% 48% 47% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
1.10 1.29 0.89 | 189 226 149 | 16 10 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 4 3 | -1 +2 -3 | 65% 58% 73% | 140 159 119 | 30% 42% 17% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.83 1.12 0.52 | 173 210 134 | 14 10 4 | / 18 7 11 / | 7 4 3 | -4 +3 -7 | 52% 67% 36% | 116 139 92 | 23% 19% 30% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.64 1.07 0.16 | 130 174 83 | 12 9 3 | / 17 6 11 / | 0 0 0 | -5 +3 -8 | 52% 67% 36% | 82 108 54 | 28% 33% 18% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.63 0.57 0.71 | 155 161 150 | 11 6 5 | / 21 11 10 / | 6 4 2 | -10 -5 -5 | 74% 92% 55% | 118 120 115 | 39% 41% 38% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.74 1.05 1.43 | 251 270 207 | 38 24 14 | / 23 8 15 / | 24 16 8 | +15 +16 -1 | 88% 91% 83% | 153 163 141 | 22% 22% 22% | 3 3 0 | 1 1 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.51 1.26 1.40 | 214 196 229 | 32 18 14 | / 21 8 13 / | 34 19 15 | +11 +10 +1 | 90% 96% 83% | 158 161 154 | 42% 36% 50% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.53 1.17 1.37 | 284 325 230 | 39 25 14 | / 27 14 13 / | 22 16 6 | +12 +11 +1 | 76% 83% 67% | 178 214 131 | 21% 20% 24% | 9 5 4 | 8 4 4 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.14 1.26 1.19 | 230 246 212 | 33 21 12 | / 26 14 12 / | 22 10 12 | +7 +7 0 | 78% 83% 72% | 151 153 148 | 33% 38% 29% | 10 6 4 | 4 2 2 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
1.12 0.98 1.06 | 184 194 181 | 28 16 12 | / 26 13 13 / | 18 12 6 | +2 +3 -1 | 93% 91% 94% | 138 134 143 | 23% 25% 23% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.99 1.17 1.09 | 213 194 222 | 30 13 17 | / 31 13 18 / | 11 4 7 | -1 0 -1 | 66% 56% 74% | 146 134 155 | 27% 30% 25% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
1.02 0.88 0.94 | 186 219 168 | 28 15 13 | / 34 13 21 / | 5 2 3 | -6 +2 -8 | 71% 78% 65% | 138 146 132 | 48% 47% 49% | 4 2 2 | 5 2 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.03 0.86 0.93 | 178 179 176 | 26 13 13 | / 31 11 20 / | 9 4 5 | -5 +2 -7 | 54% 61% 48% | 119 125 115 | 26% 23% 28% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
1.05 0.27 0.61 | 157 215 106 | 21 15 6 | / 35 12 23 / | 11 5 6 | -14 +3 -17 | 59% 72% 48% | 93 121 71 | 22% 20% 24% | 2 0 2 | 6 2 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.50 0.36 0.41 | 132 170 108 | 18 10 8 | / 39 17 22 / | 7 5 2 | -21 -7 -14 | 59% 89% 35% | 98 120 80 | 39% 36% 43% | 6 4 2 | 8 3 5 | -2 +1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.85 2.28 1.00 | 321 359 247 | 21 16 5 | / 10 4 6 / | 19 13 6 | +11 +12 -1 | 100% 100% 100% | 185 206 144 | 20% 26% 12% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.77 1.68 1.96 | 248 215 314 | 17 10 7 | / 7 4 3 / | 19 12 7 | +10 +6 +4 | 100% 100% 100% | 186 174 210 | 41% 32% 58% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.41 0.87 2.49 | 224 170 334 | 15 8 7 | / 10 8 2 / | 15 7 8 | +5 0 +5 | 89% 83% 100% | 122 81 203 | 39% 36% 41% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.24 1.44 0.86 | 296 341 209 | 17 13 4 | / 12 7 5 / | 7 5 2 | +5 +6 -1 | 78% 75% 83% | 189 217 131 | 17% 17% 18% | 4 3 1 | 7 4 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.79 0.68 1.03 | 150 165 121 | 9 6 3 | / 13 10 3 / | 11 8 3 | -4 -4 0 | 89% 83% 100% | 113 122 96 | 29% 28% 30% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.07 0.37 1.42 | 236 130 289 | 14 3 11 | / 14 5 9 / | 4 0 4 | 0 -2 +2 | 67% 50% 75% | 153 84 188 | 25% 13% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.07 0.85 1.18 | 182 118 214 | 12 3 9 | / 13 4 9 / | 2 0 2 | -1 -1 0 | 56% 50% 58% | 123 96 137 | 30% 43% 27% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.74 0.73 0.74 | 150 147 152 | 10 3 7 | / 16 5 11 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -2 -4 | 67% 83% 58% | 112 105 116 | 50% 44% 54% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.59 1.00 0.38 | 184 299 127 | 9 6 3 | / 18 6 12 / | 11 5 6 | -9 0 -9 | 67% 83% 58% | 106 146 86 | 18% 9% 28% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.13 0.36 0.03 | 109 189 70 | 7 4 3 | / 18 6 12 / | 1 1 0 | -11 -2 -9 | 39% 83% 17% | 72 121 48 | 37% 29% 60% | 3 2 1 | 5 1 4 | -2 +1 -3 |
https://www.vlr.gg/event/1458/challengers-league-north-america/playoffs sadly no, they destroy sr.. but we'll see what are both of these team doing, or maybe lower bracket team.
i mean it all doesn't matter until the playoff (because you can look good in the split but when it matters the most you choke), and I also think m80 was actually strat saving in the split.. (G2 is diff case LMFAO) + m80 destroyed them in the playoff.. (not an m80 fan, just saying the truth) but let's see if Moist can make it happens :D
tgrd beating g2 [tgrd having an even CLOSER match with m80 than with moist] (https://www.vlr.gg/185980/m80-vs-the-guard-challengers-league-north-america-ubf/?game=120857&tab=overview)
Think about it. If moist 2-0'd tgrd, but the match-up with m80 vs tgrd was a 2-1, moist more easily beat tgrd, which means they played better than m80. Even in the LAST match up with m80 vs moist, moist should've won it because on ascent moist got 7 rounds while attacking on a defender sided map, but back then, moist's defense was definitely lacking. Now their defensive side of ascent is much better, since they have a new comp now as well. Also, flyuh had an off match while everyone else was on point. When your igl is playing bad, it's practically impossible to win the match. Anyways, it'll be close, but I'm definitely leaning on moist's side. I understand supporting m80, but saying it won't be close is beyond delusional.
I think bind is a fake perma ban for m80 and they might not ban it. Even if it is they can bluff it and keep it floating. I donโt see a world where mxm pick bind especially since they have 0 footage of m80 on bind while m80 do. The vetos will be hard to predict but a possible one could look like this
Mxm ban split
M80 ban haven
Mxm pick lotus
M80 pick fracture
Mxm ban bind
M80 ban ascent
Pearl remains
The vetos would favor m80 more since mxm arenโt good on fracture and m80 can pick attack first on lotus get a big lead and close it out on defence
Edit: I was wrong about bind and I think mxm will 2-1. Fracture is a fake perma ban for moist
Here's a question though: Do you think MxM will keep their comps the same? If MxM change their Lotus comp, it makes it very likely for me that they take Lotus. Even if they keep their comp the same, MxM have good odds of taking Lotus.
Also, we haven't seen MxM play fracture in a long time. They played Bind for the first time against the Guard and beat them. I'm pretty sure they'll have something ready for Fracture.
M80 could pull a comp change on Pearl, but even so, I'd say MxM's odds look pretty good. As it stands, M80 is favored, but only just a bit.