MxM 2-1 M80
Lotus 9-13
Haven 13-7
Pearl 13-10
thief goes bananas
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.63 1.32 | 272 308 241 | 22 12 10 | / 15 7 8 / | 15 11 4 | +7 +5 +2 | 74% 91% 58% | 169 210 131 | 24% 23% 26% | 5 2 3 | 1 0 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.26 1.60 0.95 | 217 224 212 | 19 10 9 | / 13 3 10 / | 7 4 3 | +6 +7 -1 | 96% 100% 92% | 157 147 166 | 21% 21% 21% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.11 1.14 1.07 | 180 174 187 | 17 8 9 | / 13 4 9 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +4 0 | 78% 82% 75% | 128 115 139 | 25% 15% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.10 1.32 0.90 | 180 174 186 | 15 8 7 | / 14 4 10 / | 15 7 8 | +1 +4 -3 | 83% 91% 75% | 136 147 126 | 43% 42% 44% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.03 1.44 0.65 | 236 329 151 | 18 13 5 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 3 4 | +2 +7 -5 | 70% 82% 58% | 174 232 120 | 30% 39% 22% | 7 5 2 | 3 1 2 | +4 +4 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 1.17 1.04 | 221 254 185 | 18 12 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 4 1 3 | 0 +4 -4 | 74% 75% 73% | 159 167 150 | 47% 48% 47% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
1.10 1.29 0.89 | 189 226 149 | 16 10 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 4 3 | -1 +2 -3 | 65% 58% 73% | 140 159 119 | 30% 42% 17% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.83 1.12 0.52 | 173 210 134 | 14 10 4 | / 18 7 11 / | 7 4 3 | -4 +3 -7 | 52% 67% 36% | 116 139 92 | 23% 19% 30% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.64 1.07 0.16 | 130 174 83 | 12 9 3 | / 17 6 11 / | 0 0 0 | -5 +3 -8 | 52% 67% 36% | 82 108 54 | 28% 33% 18% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.63 0.57 0.71 | 155 161 150 | 11 6 5 | / 21 11 10 / | 6 4 2 | -10 -5 -5 | 74% 92% 55% | 118 120 115 | 39% 41% 38% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.74 1.05 1.43 | 251 270 207 | 38 24 14 | / 23 8 15 / | 24 16 8 | +15 +16 -1 | 88% 91% 83% | 153 163 141 | 22% 22% 22% | 3 3 0 | 1 1 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.51 1.26 1.40 | 214 196 229 | 32 18 14 | / 21 8 13 / | 34 19 15 | +11 +10 +1 | 90% 96% 83% | 158 161 154 | 42% 36% 50% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.53 1.17 1.37 | 284 325 230 | 39 25 14 | / 27 14 13 / | 22 16 6 | +12 +11 +1 | 76% 83% 67% | 178 214 131 | 21% 20% 24% | 9 5 4 | 8 4 4 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.14 1.26 1.19 | 230 246 212 | 33 21 12 | / 26 14 12 / | 22 10 12 | +7 +7 0 | 78% 83% 72% | 151 153 148 | 33% 38% 29% | 10 6 4 | 4 2 2 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
1.12 0.98 1.06 | 184 194 181 | 28 16 12 | / 26 13 13 / | 18 12 6 | +2 +3 -1 | 93% 91% 94% | 138 134 143 | 23% 25% 23% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.99 1.17 1.09 | 213 194 222 | 30 13 17 | / 31 13 18 / | 11 4 7 | -1 0 -1 | 66% 56% 74% | 146 134 155 | 27% 30% 25% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
1.02 0.88 0.94 | 186 219 168 | 28 15 13 | / 34 13 21 / | 5 2 3 | -6 +2 -8 | 71% 78% 65% | 138 146 132 | 48% 47% 49% | 4 2 2 | 5 2 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.03 0.86 0.93 | 178 179 176 | 26 13 13 | / 31 11 20 / | 9 4 5 | -5 +2 -7 | 54% 61% 48% | 119 125 115 | 26% 23% 28% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
1.05 0.27 0.61 | 157 215 106 | 21 15 6 | / 35 12 23 / | 11 5 6 | -14 +3 -17 | 59% 72% 48% | 93 121 71 | 22% 20% 24% | 2 0 2 | 6 2 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.50 0.36 0.41 | 132 170 108 | 18 10 8 | / 39 17 22 / | 7 5 2 | -21 -7 -14 | 59% 89% 35% | 98 120 80 | 39% 36% 43% | 6 4 2 | 8 3 5 | -2 +1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.85 2.28 1.00 | 321 359 247 | 21 16 5 | / 10 4 6 / | 19 13 6 | +11 +12 -1 | 100% 100% 100% | 185 206 144 | 20% 26% 12% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.77 1.68 1.96 | 248 215 314 | 17 10 7 | / 7 4 3 / | 19 12 7 | +10 +6 +4 | 100% 100% 100% | 186 174 210 | 41% 32% 58% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.41 0.87 2.49 | 224 170 334 | 15 8 7 | / 10 8 2 / | 15 7 8 | +5 0 +5 | 89% 83% 100% | 122 81 203 | 39% 36% 41% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.24 1.44 0.86 | 296 341 209 | 17 13 4 | / 12 7 5 / | 7 5 2 | +5 +6 -1 | 78% 75% 83% | 189 217 131 | 17% 17% 18% | 4 3 1 | 7 4 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.79 0.68 1.03 | 150 165 121 | 9 6 3 | / 13 10 3 / | 11 8 3 | -4 -4 0 | 89% 83% 100% | 113 122 96 | 29% 28% 30% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.07 0.37 1.42 | 236 130 289 | 14 3 11 | / 14 5 9 / | 4 0 4 | 0 -2 +2 | 67% 50% 75% | 153 84 188 | 25% 13% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.07 0.85 1.18 | 182 118 214 | 12 3 9 | / 13 4 9 / | 2 0 2 | -1 -1 0 | 56% 50% 58% | 123 96 137 | 30% 43% 27% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.74 0.73 0.74 | 150 147 152 | 10 3 7 | / 16 5 11 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -2 -4 | 67% 83% 58% | 112 105 116 | 50% 44% 54% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.59 1.00 0.38 | 184 299 127 | 9 6 3 | / 18 6 12 / | 11 5 6 | -9 0 -9 | 67% 83% 58% | 106 146 86 | 18% 9% 28% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.13 0.36 0.03 | 109 189 70 | 7 4 3 | / 18 6 12 / | 1 1 0 | -11 -2 -9 | 39% 83% 17% | 72 121 48 | 37% 29% 60% | 3 2 1 | 5 1 4 | -2 +1 -3 |
DELUSIONAL_SCOURGE_FAN [#5]MxM 2-0 OXG
you edit it and you still got it wrong XD You thought OXG going to beat M80? fkn delusional braindead XD
thefaz31 [#17]MXM 2-1
Last time they played it was a close M80 2-1 but MXM has been on a heater since then and M80 lost to SR
https://www.vlr.gg/event/1458/challengers-league-north-america/playoffs sadly no, they destroy sr.. but we'll see what are both of these team doing, or maybe lower bracket team.
Kay- [#26]https://www.vlr.gg/event/1458/challengers-league-north-america/playoffs sadly no, they destroy sr.. but we'll see what are both of these team doing, or maybe lower bracket team.
Sr beat m80 2-0 in split 2 is what they are referring too.
koromast [#33]now that i think about it the logos of both teams are pretty ugly looking ngl i wouldnt buy merch if that goofy ahh drop logo or the goofy ahh spray paint bomb logo appeared on it ngl 💀
Common iron chatter L
danii1 [#40]I'm leaning M80 2-0, cuz they've been on such a heater these playoffs.
And MxM haven’t?
Beastassassin [#30]Sr beat m80 2-0 in split 2 is what they are referring too.
i mean it all doesn't matter until the playoff (because you can look good in the split but when it matters the most you choke), and I also think m80 was actually strat saving in the split.. (G2 is diff case LMFAO) + m80 destroyed them in the playoff.. (not an m80 fan, just saying the truth) but let's see if Moist can make it happens :D
Cosmic_ [#2]Guard 2-1 M80
Aww, another Guard fan took a wrong turn and got lost in the tourney bracket.
itisnoah54 [#46]MxM 2-0 M80
Keep the 2-0 undefeated streak going for a third. Close games tho, possibly some OT but MxM brings it back.
.
MIKA-IL [#48]
- M80 2-0 MxM
- idk why a lot are expecting MxM to win but M80 is waaaay too good at any aspect
Flag and flair
MIKA-IL [#9]you edit it and you still got it wrong XD You thought OXG going to beat M80? fkn delusional braindead XD
NENAN
randomperson [#51]Close 2-1
who ever loses gets clapped by tgrd in lowers
let TGRD win against G2 first lmao
TGOPARTHIB [#52]let TGRD win against G2 first lmao
guaranteed win
might watch to see gold2 getting 2-0ed
MIKA-IL [#48]
- M80 2-0 MxM
- idk why a lot are expecting MxM to win but M80 is waaaay too good at any aspect
probably because the guard is arguably better or equal to m80 and moist 2-0'd them
Sketters [#44]in moguls we trust
MXM is doing great, they just need a lil more confidence in their accuracy, not that they aren't unstoppable at this rate.
Stally [#41]And MxM haven’t?
Thief is tactically brilliant, OP aint watching shit
Thief throws Molly last second to avoid Guard from disabling the bomb >> health was too low
fallacies [#55]probably because the guard is arguably better or equal to m80 and moist 2-0'd them
bro TGRD lost to MxM two times and lost to G2 & M80 how can you make it equal to M80 ? M80 already beat MxM once even though they were a lil sloppy but now they're looking crisp, I don't even think that it will be a close game between M80 & MxM
llamalawyer [#56]MXM is doing great, they just need a lil more confidence in their accuracy, not that they aren't unstoppable at this rate.
I really hope MXM pulls trough... I would make some massive bank from them winning, on the other side I have no idea why I even bet on them in the first place cause I always knew it was a 50/50
randomperson [#53]guaranteed win
might watch to see gold2 getting 2-0ed
Lets see if they can defeat OXG
I think bind is a fake perma ban for m80 and they might not ban it. Even if it is they can bluff it and keep it floating. I don’t see a world where mxm pick bind especially since they have 0 footage of m80 on bind while m80 do. The vetos will be hard to predict but a possible one could look like this
Mxm ban split
M80 ban haven
Mxm pick lotus
M80 pick fracture
Mxm ban bind
M80 ban ascent
Pearl remains
The vetos would favor m80 more since mxm aren’t good on fracture and m80 can pick attack first on lotus get a big lead and close it out on defence
Edit: I was wrong about bind and I think mxm will 2-1. Fracture is a fake perma ban for moist
filter [#62]I think bind is a fake perma ban for m80 and they might not ban it. Even if it is they can bluff it and keep it floating. I don’t see a world where mxm pick bind especially since they have 0 footage of m80 on bind while m80 do. The vetos will be hard to predict but a possible one could look like this
Mxm ban split
M80 ban haven
Mxm pick lotus
M80 pick fracture
Mxm ban bind
M80 ban ascent
Pearl remainsThe vetos would favor m80 more since mxm aren’t good on fracture and m80 can pick attack first on lotus get a big lead and close it out on defence
Edit: I was wrong about bind and I think mxm will 2-1. Fracture is a fake perma ban for moist
Here's a question though: Do you think MxM will keep their comps the same? If MxM change their Lotus comp, it makes it very likely for me that they take Lotus. Even if they keep their comp the same, MxM have good odds of taking Lotus.
Also, we haven't seen MxM play fracture in a long time. They played Bind for the first time against the Guard and beat them. I'm pretty sure they'll have something ready for Fracture.
M80 could pull a comp change on Pearl, but even so, I'd say MxM's odds look pretty good. As it stands, M80 is favored, but only just a bit.
MIKA-IL [#59]bro TGRD lost to MxM two times and lost to G2 & M80 how can you make it equal to M80 ? M80 already beat MxM once even though they were a lil sloppy but now they're looking crisp, I don't even think that it will be a close game between M80 & MxM
tgrd beating g2 [tgrd having an even CLOSER match with m80 than with moist] (https://www.vlr.gg/185980/m80-vs-the-guard-challengers-league-north-america-ubf/?game=120857&tab=overview)
Think about it. If moist 2-0'd tgrd, but the match-up with m80 vs tgrd was a 2-1, moist more easily beat tgrd, which means they played better than m80. Even in the LAST match up with m80 vs moist, moist should've won it because on ascent moist got 7 rounds while attacking on a defender sided map, but back then, moist's defense was definitely lacking. Now their defensive side of ascent is much better, since they have a new comp now as well. Also, flyuh had an off match while everyone else was on point. When your igl is playing bad, it's practically impossible to win the match. Anyways, it'll be close, but I'm definitely leaning on moist's side. I understand supporting m80, but saying it won't be close is beyond delusional.
Jack0000n [#24]It is 2 slots
They mean Ascension which this year is one slot, not qualifying to Americas' Ascension which is two
HassanWillSaveAmerica [#32]M80 will smoke these lucky frauds
LMAO Nothing lucky about it, it's just a good team.
filter [#62]I think bind is a fake perma ban for m80 and they might not ban it. Even if it is they can bluff it and keep it floating. I don’t see a world where mxm pick bind especially since they have 0 footage of m80 on bind while m80 do. The vetos will be hard to predict but a possible one could look like this
Mxm ban split
M80 ban haven
Mxm pick lotus
M80 pick fracture
Mxm ban bind
M80 ban ascent
Pearl remainsThe vetos would favor m80 more since mxm aren’t good on fracture and m80 can pick attack first on lotus get a big lead and close it out on defence
Edit: I was wrong about bind and I think mxm will 2-1. Fracture is a fake perma ban for moist
m80 often bans bind
fallacies [#64]tgrd beating g2 [tgrd having an even CLOSER match with m80 than with moist] (https://www.vlr.gg/185980/m80-vs-the-guard-challengers-league-north-america-ubf/?game=120857&tab=overview)
Think about it. If moist 2-0'd tgrd, but the match-up with m80 vs tgrd was a 2-1, moist more easily beat tgrd, which means they played better than m80. Even in the LAST match up with m80 vs moist, moist should've won it because on ascent moist got 7 rounds while attacking on a defender sided map, but back then, moist's defense was definitely lacking. Now their defensive side of ascent is much better, since they have a new comp now as well. Also, flyuh had an off match while everyone else was on point. When your igl is playing bad, it's practically impossible to win the match. Anyways, it'll be close, but I'm definitely leaning on moist's side. I understand supporting m80, but saying it won't be close is beyond delusional.
i told u broo M80 is just DIFF, not even close LFG
Fullgearz [#1]MxM 2-1 M80
Lotus 9-13
Haven 13-7
Pearl 13-10thief goes bananas
we lose some, we win some. riding with moist till the end. m80 played really good, congrats to them.
benjy [#90]WELCOME M80 TO ASCENSION, YOU'LL BE MEETING THE GUARD SOON 😉
No way the truth got downvoted 😭😭