boaster was never good enough for tier 1 valorant and no level of "In game leading" is worth the terrible mechanics
Ange1 is quite literally a worse mechanical player than boaster and they won so idk what this take even means. There is a reason OpTic won masters Reykjavik because FNS mid game calls were next too perfect, always putting yay in the best position too succeed. A in game brain is so much more important than just an aimer
that's fair and I know I didn't elaborate on that but I think having a big brain igl that doesn't have good mechanics is better than a okay brain igl that has great mechanics. Literally every masters/champions winner has had a good igl that doesn't have good mechanics besides Shaz who played really well in masters 1
Imagine stating that about a player who has 30% HS in 377 rounds on the current masters tour... Given that HS% isn't the most crucial aim component(or?) in mech-skill, you're still out of your mind for saying that.
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1014/valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen