boaster was never good enough for tier 1 valorant and no level of "In game leading" is worth the terrible mechanics
0
Controversial opinion
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Been saying this for a long time but people simp for his cringe character too hard
Not true. Fns and boaster have always had lacking aim but it’s so worth to have them in game instead of just coaching
True. But vanity at home practice on his judge. FNS and boaster travel to another country to compete. That's big diff
true, but also both of them mechanically improved by leaps and bounds this stage.
he's decent at best, not the worst of the crop but definitely not great in either IGL or mechanical skills.
Prob got the best personality to him though outta most IGLs
funny that u guys dont say shit like this for fns who performs way worse than boaster
clearly they bring value to the team
stop posting stupid shit
bro is saying a top igl is bad, shows the inner silver rank. This guy probably bases his thoughts from stats. Its like saying FNS is bad because imo he has worse mechanics than boaster, even though he is the best igl in NA by far.
True 0,96 kd in playoffs is so bad, a true t1 player would go 1,4 at least
Like look he's the second best igl from the 4 that were left, with angel and fns preforming SIGNIFICANTLY worse than him when it comes to fragging and I wouldnt say either of them are doing bad atm.
his level of in game leading is the problem, his individual level is fine for an igl but boaster without enzo to say where they need to adapt he is a tier99 caller with great creative mind for gimmicky strats, he should be analyst or coach
Ange1 is quite literally a worse mechanical player than boaster and they won so idk what this take even means. There is a reason OpTic won masters Reykjavik because FNS mid game calls were next too perfect, always putting yay in the best position too succeed. A in game brain is so much more important than just an aimer
you are trolling, ange1 is 10x times the player individually that boaster is lol
No hate ... but maybe you'd have a point if you defined mech-skill or properly backed your argument when comparing three IGL players. Otherwise, not close imho.
that's fair and I know I didn't elaborate on that but I think having a big brain igl that doesn't have good mechanics is better than a okay brain igl that has great mechanics. Literally every masters/champions winner has had a good igl that doesn't have good mechanics besides Shaz who played really well in masters 1
Imagine stating that about a player who has 30% HS in 377 rounds on the current masters tour... Given that HS% isn't the most crucial aim component(or?) in mech-skill, you're still out of your mind for saying that.
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1014/valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen
OK i dont agree with this thread because boaster was a monster this tournament
But angel has much better mechanics than boaster what are u even saying XD
Discord