boaster was never good enough for tier 1 valorant and no level of "In game leading" is worth the terrible mechanics
chimpy [#4]Not true. Fns and boaster have always had lacking aim but it’s so worth to have them in game instead of just coaching
Vanity > both of them
Nutzzz [#3]Been saying this for a long time but people simp for his cringe character too hard
fr like hes not even funny
sad_gambit_fan [#10]funny that u guys dont say shit like this for fns who performs way worse than boaster
clearly they bring value to the team
stop posting stupid shit
Cuz he got a trophy
sad_gambit_fan [#10]funny that u guys dont say shit like this for fns who performs way worse than boaster
clearly they bring value to the team
stop posting stupid shit
good point here m8
Nutzzz [#6]Vanity > both of them
True. But vanity at home practice on his judge. FNS and boaster travel to another country to compete. That's big diff
Ange1 is quite literally a worse mechanical player than boaster and they won so idk what this take even means. There is a reason OpTic won masters Reykjavik because FNS mid game calls were next too perfect, always putting yay in the best position too succeed. A in game brain is so much more important than just an aimer
pugboy [#25]Ange1 is quite literally a worse mechanical player than boaster and they won so idk what this take even means. There is a reason OpTic won masters Reykjavik because FNS mid game calls were next too perfect, always putting yay in the best position too succeed. A in game brain is so much more important than just an aimer
you are trolling, ange1 is 10x times the player individually that boaster is lol
idkbro [#26]you are trolling, ange1 is 10x times the player individually that boaster is lol
okay you're right but I feel I have a point here
pugboy [#27]okay you're right but I feel I have a point here
No hate ... but maybe you'd have a point if you defined mech-skill or properly backed your argument when comparing three IGL players. Otherwise, not close imho.
pugboy [#25]Ange1 is quite literally a worse mechanical player than boaster and they won so idk what this take even means. There is a reason OpTic won masters Reykjavik because FNS mid game calls were next too perfect, always putting yay in the best position too succeed. A in game brain is so much more important than just an aimer
Imagine stating that about a player who has 30% HS in 377 rounds on the current masters tour... Given that HS% isn't the most crucial aim component(or?) in mech-skill, you're still out of your mind for saying that.
https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1014/valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen
chimpy [#4]Not true. Fns and boaster have always had lacking aim but it’s so worth to have them in game instead of just coaching
true, but also both of them mechanically improved by leaps and bounds this stage.
boarkejer [#32]Are his mechanics really that terrible for an igl controller?
its not ppl overreacting from this series
pugboy [#25]Ange1 is quite literally a worse mechanical player than boaster and they won so idk what this take even means. There is a reason OpTic won masters Reykjavik because FNS mid game calls were next too perfect, always putting yay in the best position too succeed. A in game brain is so much more important than just an aimer
OK i dont agree with this thread because boaster was a monster this tournament
But angel has much better mechanics than boaster what are u even saying XD
clocksky888 [#30]No hate ... but maybe you'd have a point if you defined mech-skill or properly backed your argument when comparing three IGL players. Otherwise, not close imho.
that's fair and I know I didn't elaborate on that but I think having a big brain igl that doesn't have good mechanics is better than a okay brain igl that has great mechanics. Literally every masters/champions winner has had a good igl that doesn't have good mechanics besides Shaz who played really well in masters 1
pugboy [#39]that's fair and I know I didn't elaborate on that but I think having a big brain igl that doesn't have good mechanics is better than a okay brain igl that has great mechanics. Literally every masters/champions winner has had a good igl that doesn't have good mechanics besides Shaz who played really well in masters 1
It's all good; no worries <3