I have been working on a rating for duelists to determine whether a duelist is actually good or actually bad using some stats. So reply with some duelists that is considered bad or a fraud and I will put the rating through them. (The rating is from a scale from 0-1, e.g. Aspas at champs was rated 0.745)
*Note: This rating is in its early stages so its not perfect yet. I am using this to figure out which players to test out and see how it goes
KD, KPR, FEPR (First Engagements Per Round), FEWR (First Engagement Win Rate), HS%, KAST and FECR (First Engagement Conversion Rate). I also have KIPR (Kill Impact Per Round) but that I have to do manually and takes too long so I dont take that into account most of the time but I am working on some kind of data scraper maybe that could do it automatally?. All these stats are weighted differently and I am currently experimenting with it. I know there is probably a lot more other factors to consider and I am working on it but I dont think it will ever be perfect
yeah basically it shows how effective their first engagement actually is because if they just get picked off all the time but not actually able to take space off that first engagement and eventually win the round then it is not really useful of course there are a bunch of other factors which is why it is probably better if its how many first engagements lead to planting the bomb instead of winning the round but idk give me your thoughts
yeah it's fine maybe should be weighted a bit less because a conversion depends on other teammates ability to capitalize off their opening, but i guess u're playing around with it so it comes down to how you feel about its importance. Also swap HS for ADRa I guess? (lowkey its derivation is very ehh, and I dont expect your work to be as intensive as theirs so you could just not bother :P)
https://www.vlr.gg/160667/vlr-gg-player-rating-explained
Overall I'm just curious how this captures performance better than vlr's general rating system for all roles since u aren't directly factoring in assists like they do.
Yeah, that is true. I will probably get rid of HS% entirely and give the weight to other stuff or yeah I could do ADRa.
This project is for coaching. Basically, I am a Tier 3 Valorant coach and I want to evaluate players that are trialing performance to each other to determine the best for our team. Right now I am focusing on stats, but there are other things that I want to add that will help me decide like chemistry and stuff that could be less factual stats and more opinions. I will be doing one for each role as they all have different responsibilities. This is different as opposed to the vlr rating which is trying to find the best player overall as they don't really categorize by roles and don't take into account all these other factors.
I'm ngl that sounds like a fuck ton of work but it's for your career so 👍.
Do bear in mind that these stats can never tell the full story though, so capturing complex interrelationships like chem and stuff will almost definitely be lossy.
Also if u want a second opinion, dm the extremely french nerd @anguibok, she's played around with these numbers more than most on vlr. Or fehrago, if he responds. Good luck bro.
Basically we take the situation the kill is taken in and put it through multiplier to show the actual impact like a kill in a 1v5 situation is worth more than a kill in a 5v1 since you already have man advantage. Also there is economy multipliers as eco frags with a vandal against a pistol shouldnt be worth as much compared to a pistol kill against a vandal which is worth much more to turn around the economy. There is also wether or not it was after the round was won/lost as it only affects the economy but doesn't effect the round outcome. There is also time multipliers as kills when there is very less time both left in the round and left until spike explodes can be worth more to clutch up but time multipliers are the least weighted
Discord