Lets go v1!
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.12 0.86 1.38 | 248 258 240 | 22 11 11 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 2 2 | +6 +1 +5 | 67% 50% 83% | 158 152 164 | 20% 24% 13% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.09 1.06 1.12 | 189 139 241 | 16 6 10 | / 15 7 8 / | 12 9 3 | +1 -1 +2 | 67% 67% 67% | 129 83 174 | 42% 45% 40% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.99 0.88 1.10 | 211 213 210 | 19 8 11 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 3 0 | +3 -2 +5 | 67% 58% 75% | 144 166 121 | 44% 45% 41% | 2 1 1 | 3 3 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.99 1.05 0.94 | 181 209 155 | 16 11 5 | / 14 8 6 / | 9 1 8 | +2 +3 -1 | 83% 83% 83% | 120 132 108 | 15% 26% 4% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.95 0.72 1.19 | 170 99 242 | 14 4 10 | / 15 7 8 / | 8 2 6 | -1 -3 +2 | 75% 58% 92% | 137 75 199 | 31% 13% 43% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.30 1.40 | 258 248 269 | 23 11 12 | / 15 8 7 / | 4 0 4 | +8 +3 +5 | 67% 58% 75% | 163 143 183 | 39% 53% 31% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.13 0.82 1.44 | 232 151 314 | 20 7 13 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 3 2 | +3 -2 +5 | 63% 58% 67% | 126 78 174 | 18% 22% 14% | 5 1 4 | 3 2 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.95 0.75 1.16 | 182 139 226 | 14 5 9 | / 18 10 8 / | 9 5 4 | -4 -5 +1 | 63% 58% 67% | 121 90 151 | 41% 33% 47% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.87 0.90 0.85 | 130 161 100 | 11 6 5 | / 17 10 7 / | 8 5 3 | -6 -4 -2 | 71% 58% 83% | 87 110 63 | 38% 58% 17% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.50 0.54 0.46 | 100 119 82 | 8 5 3 | / 20 11 9 / | 7 3 4 | -12 -6 -6 | 63% 67% 58% | 67 63 70 | 15% 17% 13% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.42 1.39 | 221 185 249 | 38 15 23 | / 23 10 13 / | 15 12 3 | +15 +5 +10 | 73% 71% 75% | 154 128 176 | 37% 33% 40% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.19 1.23 1.22 | 259 281 234 | 41 20 21 | / 28 15 13 / | 16 8 8 | +13 +5 +8 | 73% 71% 75% | 160 188 136 | 23% 21% 26% | 6 3 3 | 5 4 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.91 1.20 1.06 | 188 124 243 | 30 11 19 | / 26 10 16 / | 17 6 11 | +4 +1 +3 | 80% 71% 88% | 142 91 187 | 40% 28% 48% | 4 1 3 | 2 0 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.86 1.04 0.95 | 207 224 197 | 33 17 16 | / 30 15 15 / | 9 5 4 | +3 +2 +1 | 73% 62% 83% | 136 137 134 | 20% 21% 18% | 7 3 4 | 7 3 4 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.96 0.77 0.85 | 173 197 153 | 27 17 10 | / 29 14 15 / | 19 6 13 | -2 +3 -5 | 82% 86% 79% | 112 118 107 | 16% 26% 9% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 1.34 1.20 | 261 226 298 | 40 19 21 | / 33 18 15 / | 8 5 3 | +7 +1 +6 | 73% 75% 71% | 152 134 173 | 26% 27% 26% | 10 4 6 | 8 6 2 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
0.98 1.12 1.04 | 200 183 229 | 33 16 17 | / 32 17 15 / | 5 0 5 | +1 -1 +2 | 56% 50% 62% | 135 113 160 | 43% 48% 39% | 4 3 1 | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.75 1.12 0.92 | 172 142 209 | 25 11 14 | / 33 19 14 / | 14 7 7 | -8 -8 0 | 64% 67% 62% | 112 93 134 | 40% 41% 40% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.94 0.69 0.82 | 145 169 114 | 21 13 8 | / 33 18 15 / | 21 16 5 | -12 -5 -7 | 78% 79% 76% | 98 104 91 | 30% 42% 19% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.72 0.37 0.56 | 113 152 66 | 17 13 4 | / 38 21 17 / | 20 7 13 | -21 -8 -13 | 67% 75% 57% | 68 88 46 | 18% 21% 12% | 1 1 0 | 5 3 2 | -4 -2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.74 1.74 1.73 | 253 248 258 | 22 9 13 | / 8 3 5 / | 3 3 0 | +14 +6 +8 | 81% 78% 83% | 182 187 178 | 35% 28% 41% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.47 1.61 1.36 | 306 372 257 | 22 12 10 | / 12 5 7 / | 13 5 8 | +10 +7 +3 | 81% 89% 75% | 179 218 150 | 13% 10% 18% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.19 1.16 1.22 | 206 157 243 | 16 7 9 | / 11 3 8 / | 9 4 5 | +5 +4 +1 | 86% 89% 83% | 149 112 176 | 49% 44% 52% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.76 0.85 0.70 | 165 180 154 | 11 6 5 | / 14 5 9 / | 5 3 2 | -3 +1 -4 | 81% 78% 83% | 110 118 104 | 20% 17% 22% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.70 0.83 0.59 | 164 182 152 | 11 6 5 | / 15 6 9 / | 10 5 5 | -4 0 -4 | 81% 89% 75% | 102 98 105 | 17% 25% 13% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 1.34 1.19 | 290 301 277 | 20 12 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 2 1 | +4 +3 +1 | 86% 92% 78% | 182 190 172 | 32% 30% 35% | 5 3 2 | 5 4 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.76 1.06 | 162 145 186 | 11 6 5 | / 15 9 6 / | 5 2 3 | -4 -3 -1 | 67% 75% 56% | 102 95 111 | 39% 50% 31% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.76 0.98 0.48 | 159 178 134 | 10 7 3 | / 16 8 8 / | 13 11 2 | -6 -1 -5 | 86% 100% 67% | 110 97 128 | 26% 32% 20% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.70 0.65 0.76 | 141 117 175 | 10 5 5 | / 17 9 8 / | 1 0 1 | -7 -4 -3 | 43% 42% 44% | 103 84 129 | 50% 42% 57% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.62 0.89 0.26 | 125 185 45 | 9 8 1 | / 18 10 8 / | 13 4 9 | -9 -2 -7 | 71% 83% 56% | 70 113 13 | 22% 24% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
HackNaija [#10]It may not be close but it will be interesting to watch
Yep sad to see turtle troop only get 2 rounds
HackNaija [#10]It may not be close but it will be interesting to watch
flor clears trust fraudnaija
Liem [#32]bc v1 got stomped by way worse t3 teams
https://www.vlr.gg/214736/version1-vs-full-house-nerd-street-valorant-lockdown-2-open-6-ro32
for example here
77_sTuna [#31]Nt. Also how many tourneys do the old shopify guys play? I feel like I've watched more matches of theirs than anyone else in the game
Take a look at moose's agent list all time it's insane
Liem [#33]https://www.vlr.gg/214736/version1-vs-full-house-nerd-street-valorant-lockdown-2-open-6-ro32
for example here
may 20th....
grenji [#36]V1 should ditch game changers and go co-ed. Would be a good tier 2 team with a real flex player instead of whoever GC can offer.
they played in the open qualifiers last season and sure as hell will do the same for next season. it's not a matter of "choosing to go t2" and ditching GC, they're working hard to be able to play at that level and have been playing in co-ed tourneys since the beginning of the team. they just also happen to be GC eligible, so ofc they'll play there as well.
saltbox [#38]they played in the open qualifiers last season and sure as hell will do the same for next season. it's not a matter of "choosing to go t2" and ditching GC, they're working hard to be able to play at that level and have been playing in co-ed tourneys since the beginning of the team. they just also happen to be GC eligible, so ofc they'll play there as well.
I think it is a matter of ditching GC. They need to upgrade. It'll be easier replacing from the male talent pool. Seriously, I think this team could qualify for challengers with a single roster switch.
Selex [#39]I think it is a matter of ditching GC. They need to upgrade. It'll be easier replacing from the male talent pool. Seriously, I think this team could qualify for challengers with a single roster switch.
but they want to try with this roster. and they're getting closer and closer all the time, closing the gap to t2 and improving as a team, so why switch tactics? it's also a matter of being financially viable, and farming GC prize money certainly incetivizes the org to keep supporting the team.
Selex [#39]I think it is a matter of ditching GC. They need to upgrade. It'll be easier replacing from the male talent pool. Seriously, I think this team could qualify for challengers with a single roster switch.
why would any team thats not in tier 1 ever not play more matches?
theres so mucch more opportunity for gc teams as they can play in gc AND challengers
if they make challengers then theyll ditcch gc yeah
but until then its better to keep getting experience/income to keep playingg
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]>nillyaz stops subbing
>Immediately loses
Hmmmm
in what game out of the 3 they played would u say nillyaz actually carried
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]>nillyaz stops subbing
>Immediately loses
Hmmmm
are you disappointed cuz u went to check and realized that there are none? and you're just hating for no reason?
Holistical_Nil [#42]why would any team thats not in tier 1 ever not play more matches?
theres so mucch more opportunity for gc teams as they can play in gc AND challengers
if they make challengers then theyll ditcch gc yeah
but until then its better to keep getting experience/income to keep playingg
Did you not read what I said? I think they need to replace one of their players with a strong T2 talent. If they can find a cracked undiscovered gc player, fine. Do that and play both. Otherwise I think it would be best to move on from gc and upgrade, focusing on nothing else but challengers, even if it means playing gc is no longer possible.
saltbox [#41]but they want to try with this roster. and they're getting closer and closer all the time, closing the gap to t2 and improving as a team, so why switch tactics? it's also a matter of being financially viable, and farming GC prize money certainly incetivizes the org to keep supporting the team.
They're free to do whatever they wish. But mel always talks about having higher aspirations that go beyond gc into t2/t1 and how that is a shared goal with all the players on every team she's played on. The reality is not everyone has the talent to make their dreams come true. This is e-sports. Roster swaps happen. If they really wanna go higher, then I think that's the best option after this season is over.
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]>nillyaz stops subbing
>Immediately loses
Hmmmm
are we gonna pretend that losing to TT is something to be ashamed of? They're potentially the best, at worst 2nd best Tier 2 team. They played well. Nothing wrong with losing to Turtle Troops.
XtraChrxs [#44]are you disappointed cuz u went to check and realized that there are none? and you're just hating for no reason?
It was purely observation. He did topfrag the ZMB match tho :)
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#49]It was purely observation. He did topfrag the ZMB match tho :)
not cuz he had more kills which is what most people are caring about
saltbox [#41]but they want to try with this roster. and they're getting closer and closer all the time, closing the gap to t2 and improving as a team, so why switch tactics? it's also a matter of being financially viable, and farming GC prize money certainly incetivizes the org to keep supporting the team.
they lost to one of the weaker teams in tier 2, turtle drop doesn't even have an org. They aren't ready for Challengers yet without a roster switch.
Chum [#53]they lost to one of the weaker teams in tier 2, turtle drop doesn't even have an org. They aren't ready for Challengers yet without a roster switch.
I agree with them needing a roster switch. Disagree with turtle troop being a weaker tier 2 team. They look pretty strong atm.
Selex [#54]I agree with them needing a roster switch. Disagree with turtle troop being a weaker tier 2 team. They look pretty strong atm.
iirc turtle troop was putting up good performances against Oxygen and MxM by the end of the season. Definitely on the higher end of t2 teams
Holistical_Nil [#35]may 20th....
https://www.vlr.gg/268896/version1-vs-ambrosia-knights-monthly-gauntlet-2023-august-ro32
is this better?