Lets go v1!
completed
... 108 more matches
Sunday, October 22nd
4:00 PM EDT
Patch 7.08
V1 ban Split; TTR ban Haven; V1 pick Breeze; TTR pick Lotus; V1 ban Bind; TTR ban Ascent; Sunset remains
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Streams
VODs
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
7
4
+3
|
3
12
-9
|
4
7
-3
|
11
1
+10
|
8
6
+2
|
|
moose
TTR
|
8
2
+6
|
5
6
-1
|
11
6
+5
|
9
7
+2
|
8
7
+1
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
7
5
+2
|
4
10
-6
|
7
4
+3
|
4
5
-1
|
5
5
+0
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
6
3
+3
|
13
5
+8
|
7
3
+4
|
4
4
+0
|
8
8
+0
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
10
3
+7
|
8
7
+1
|
4
5
-1
|
5
4
+1
|
3
7
-4
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
2
0
+2
|
1
4
-3
|
1
1
+0
|
2
0
+2
|
1
2
-1
|
|
moose
TTR
|
2
0
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
2
1
+1
|
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
1
3
-2
|
1
1
+0
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
0
1
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
2
0
+2
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
4
0
+4
|
|
moose
TTR
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
bdog
TTR
|
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
0
|
2
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
|
3
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
5
|
0
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
47
|
6
|
2
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
|
10
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
4
|
2
|
|
moose
TTR
|
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
2
|
0
|
|
meL
V1
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
2
|
2
|
|
alexis
V1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
10
|
0
|
|
Noia
V1
|
|
5
|
5
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
1
|
0
|
|
florescent
V1
|
|
7
|
3
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
1
|
0
|
|
sarahcat
V1
|
|
5
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
50
|
2
|
1
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
5
0
+5
|
1
7
-6
|
4
4
+0
|
7
1
+6
|
5
4
+1
|
|
moose
TTR
|
6
1
+5
|
2
4
-2
|
5
3
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
3
6
-3
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
4
3
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
4
1
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
1
2
-1
|
8
2
+6
|
2
2
+0
|
1
3
-2
|
4
6
-2
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
4
2
+2
|
4
4
+0
|
3
4
-1
|
3
1
+2
|
0
4
-4
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
moose
TTR
|
2
0
+2
|
0
2
-2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
2
0
+2
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
4
0
+4
|
|
moose
TTR
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
bdog
TTR
|
|
2
Round 6
Noia alexis
Round 7
sarahcat meL |
1
Round 10
Noia meL alexis |
2
Round 15
sarahcat alexis meL Noia
Round 16
alexis sarahcat florescent meL |
|
1
Round 8
Noia |
|
|
|
|
64
|
0
|
2
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
|
1
Round 6
florescent meL |
1
Round 5
alexis florescent sarahcat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
2
|
0
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
4
Round 3
sarahcat alexis
Round 13
sarahcat Noia
Round 14
meL florescent dazzLe
Round 17
sarahcat alexis |
|
|
|
|
1
Round 14
florescent meL |
|
|
|
55
|
2
|
2
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
|
4
Round 2
florescent sarahcat
Round 3
florescent Noia
Round 5
meL Noia
Round 23
Noia florescent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
4
|
2
|
|
moose
TTR
|
|
2
Round 10
florescent sarahcat
Round 14
alexis Noia |
3
Round 8
meL alexis sarahcat
Round 9
Noia sarahcat alexis
Round 23
sarahcat alexis meL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
0
|
0
|
|
meL
V1
|
|
2
Round 7
wedid dazzLe
Round 12
dazzLe Add3r |
|
|
|
1
Round 13
dazzLe |
|
|
|
|
35
|
0
|
1
|
|
alexis
V1
|
|
1
Round 2
dazzLe Add3r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
7
|
0
|
|
Noia
V1
|
|
4
Round 2
moose wedid
Round 4
wedid Add3r
Round 12
bdog moose
Round 16
moose bdog |
3
Round 8
dazzLe moose wedid
Round 18
bdog moose dazzLe
Round 21
bdog Add3r wedid |
|
|
1
Round 2
wedid |
|
|
|
|
61
|
1
|
0
|
|
florescent
V1
|
|
4
Round 14
wedid bdog
Round 19
bdog Add3r
Round 20
dazzLe wedid
Round 21
moose dazzLe |
1
Round 22
moose bdog wedid |
|
1
Round 1
moose bdog Add3r wedid dazzLe |
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
1
|
0
|
|
sarahcat
V1
|
|
2
Round 19
wedid dazzLe
Round 20
bdog moose |
2
Round 6
wedid bdog moose
Round 13
moose wedid bdog |
|
|
|
1
Round 6
moose bdog |
|
|
|
50
|
1
|
1
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
2
4
-2
|
2
5
-3
|
0
3
-3
|
4
0
+4
|
3
2
+1
|
|
moose
TTR
|
2
1
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
6
3
+3
|
6
5
+1
|
5
1
+4
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
3
2
+1
|
2
7
-5
|
3
3
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
2
2
+0
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
5
1
+4
|
5
3
+2
|
5
1
+4
|
3
1
+2
|
4
2
+2
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
6
1
+5
|
4
3
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
2
3
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
1
0
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
moose
TTR
|
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
1
2
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
alexis
V1
|
florescent
V1
|
sarahcat
V1
|
meL
V1
|
Noia
V1
|
|
|
bdog
TTR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moose
TTR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
bdog
TTR
|
|
2
Round 2
alexis  meL
Round 17
florescent meL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
0
|
|
wedid
TTR
|
|
2
Round 12
alexis sarahcat
Round 14
florescent alexis |
1
Round 6
florescent  Noia alexis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
3
|
0
|
|
dazzLe
TTR
|
|
1
Round 14
meL sarahcat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
4
|
0
|
|
Add3r
TTR
|
|
6
Round 1
alexis meL
Round 5
Noia alexis
Round 10
sarahcat alexis
Round 11
alexis florescent
Round 20
florescent Noia
Round 21
sarahcat florescent |
1
Round 13
florescent Noia sarahcat |
1
Round 9
alexis sarahcat florescent meL |
|
1
Round 20
Noia |
|
|
|
|
90
|
0
|
0
|
|
moose
TTR
|
|
3
Round 2
sarahcat Noia
Round 10
florescent meL
Round 18
meL Noia |
3
Round 3
Noia sarahcat alexis
Round 19
sarahcat florescent meL moose
Round 20
meL sarahcat alexis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
2
|
0
|
|
meL
V1
|
|
1
Round 10
Add3r wedid |
|
|
|
1
Round 9
Add3r |
|
|
|
|
48
|
2
|
1
|
|
alexis
V1
|
|
|
|
1
Round 7
moose dazzLe wedid bdog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
3
|
0
|
|
Noia
V1
|
|
1
Round 18
wedid Add3r |
2
Round 11
bdog dazzLe Add3r
Round 20
moose bdog wedid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
0
|
|
florescent
V1
|
|
3
Round 9
dazzLe wedid
Round 13
dazzLe moose
Round 18
dazzLe bdog |
2
Round 3
bdog moose wedid
Round 12
dazzLe wedid Add3r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
0
|
0
|
|
sarahcat
V1
|
|
3
Round 11
moose wedid
Round 16
bdog moose
Round 21
dazzLe bdog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
1
|
0
|
Stats from this map are not available yet
Head-to-head
Past Matches
HackNaija [#10]It may not be close but it will be interesting to watch
Yep sad to see turtle troop only get 2 rounds
HackNaija [#10]It may not be close but it will be interesting to watch
flor clears trust fraudnaija
Liem [#32]bc v1 got stomped by way worse t3 teams
https://www.vlr.gg/214736/version1-vs-full-house-nerd-street-valorant-lockdown-2-open-6-ro32
for example here
77_sTuna [#31]Nt. Also how many tourneys do the old shopify guys play? I feel like I've watched more matches of theirs than anyone else in the game
Take a look at moose's agent list all time it's insane
Liem [#33]https://www.vlr.gg/214736/version1-vs-full-house-nerd-street-valorant-lockdown-2-open-6-ro32
for example here
may 20th....
grenji [#36]V1 should ditch game changers and go co-ed. Would be a good tier 2 team with a real flex player instead of whoever GC can offer.
they played in the open qualifiers last season and sure as hell will do the same for next season. it's not a matter of "choosing to go t2" and ditching GC, they're working hard to be able to play at that level and have been playing in co-ed tourneys since the beginning of the team. they just also happen to be GC eligible, so ofc they'll play there as well.
saltbox [#38]they played in the open qualifiers last season and sure as hell will do the same for next season. it's not a matter of "choosing to go t2" and ditching GC, they're working hard to be able to play at that level and have been playing in co-ed tourneys since the beginning of the team. they just also happen to be GC eligible, so ofc they'll play there as well.
I think it is a matter of ditching GC. They need to upgrade. It'll be easier replacing from the male talent pool. Seriously, I think this team could qualify for challengers with a single roster switch.
Selex [#39]I think it is a matter of ditching GC. They need to upgrade. It'll be easier replacing from the male talent pool. Seriously, I think this team could qualify for challengers with a single roster switch.
but they want to try with this roster. and they're getting closer and closer all the time, closing the gap to t2 and improving as a team, so why switch tactics? it's also a matter of being financially viable, and farming GC prize money certainly incetivizes the org to keep supporting the team.
Selex [#39]I think it is a matter of ditching GC. They need to upgrade. It'll be easier replacing from the male talent pool. Seriously, I think this team could qualify for challengers with a single roster switch.
why would any team thats not in tier 1 ever not play more matches?
theres so mucch more opportunity for gc teams as they can play in gc AND challengers
if they make challengers then theyll ditcch gc yeah
but until then its better to keep getting experience/income to keep playingg
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]>nillyaz stops subbing
>Immediately loses
Hmmmm
in what game out of the 3 they played would u say nillyaz actually carried
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]>nillyaz stops subbing
>Immediately loses
Hmmmm
are you disappointed cuz u went to check and realized that there are none? and you're just hating for no reason?
Holistical_Nil [#42]why would any team thats not in tier 1 ever not play more matches?
theres so mucch more opportunity for gc teams as they can play in gc AND challengers
if they make challengers then theyll ditcch gc yeah
but until then its better to keep getting experience/income to keep playingg
Did you not read what I said? I think they need to replace one of their players with a strong T2 talent. If they can find a cracked undiscovered gc player, fine. Do that and play both. Otherwise I think it would be best to move on from gc and upgrade, focusing on nothing else but challengers, even if it means playing gc is no longer possible.
saltbox [#41]but they want to try with this roster. and they're getting closer and closer all the time, closing the gap to t2 and improving as a team, so why switch tactics? it's also a matter of being financially viable, and farming GC prize money certainly incetivizes the org to keep supporting the team.
They're free to do whatever they wish. But mel always talks about having higher aspirations that go beyond gc into t2/t1 and how that is a shared goal with all the players on every team she's played on. The reality is not everyone has the talent to make their dreams come true. This is e-sports. Roster swaps happen. If they really wanna go higher, then I think that's the best option after this season is over.
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#40]>nillyaz stops subbing
>Immediately loses
Hmmmm
are we gonna pretend that losing to TT is something to be ashamed of? They're potentially the best, at worst 2nd best Tier 2 team. They played well. Nothing wrong with losing to Turtle Troops.
XtraChrxs [#44]are you disappointed cuz u went to check and realized that there are none? and you're just hating for no reason?
It was purely observation. He did topfrag the ZMB match tho :)
AVE_TRUE_TO_CAESAR [#49]It was purely observation. He did topfrag the ZMB match tho :)
not cuz he had more kills which is what most people are caring about
saltbox [#41]but they want to try with this roster. and they're getting closer and closer all the time, closing the gap to t2 and improving as a team, so why switch tactics? it's also a matter of being financially viable, and farming GC prize money certainly incetivizes the org to keep supporting the team.
they lost to one of the weaker teams in tier 2, turtle drop doesn't even have an org. They aren't ready for Challengers yet without a roster switch.
Chum [#53]they lost to one of the weaker teams in tier 2, turtle drop doesn't even have an org. They aren't ready for Challengers yet without a roster switch.
I agree with them needing a roster switch. Disagree with turtle troop being a weaker tier 2 team. They look pretty strong atm.
Selex [#54]I agree with them needing a roster switch. Disagree with turtle troop being a weaker tier 2 team. They look pretty strong atm.
iirc turtle troop was putting up good performances against Oxygen and MxM by the end of the season. Definitely on the higher end of t2 teams
Holistical_Nil [#35]may 20th....
https://www.vlr.gg/268896/version1-vs-ambrosia-knights-monthly-gauntlet-2023-august-ro32
is this better?
Discord