Rip
FNC FPX and M3C still by far the best EMEA teams
some people dont get it
first of all FPX looks like by far the best team in the world rn, M3C lost to G2, sure but that doesnt mean they are worse, M3C came backl from an exhausting 4 hour game against FNC with one of the longest OT's, they didnt have much time to prep for G2 + they had to show most of their strats, while G2 was just waiting in the lower bracket (Btw those 6 team brackets are dogshit, u win round one, lose round 2 and you end up in the same place as if you would when u lost round 1)
and FNC went undefeated into the top 3 and then had bad performances which dont really matter tho, they looked crazy strong with braveaf and derke, derke looks like the best duelist atm aswell
and for G2, they were not looking great for the most part but were excellent towards the end and managed to make it into icleand, yes G2 is good but they might be on a heater and I'm just not as confident in them for the playoffs
g2 beat fnc and gmb but sure
getting downvoted cuz emea fans cant cope that g2 stuggled against zeta and are now saying the teams which g2 literally beat are better than them LMAO
bbg beat sentinels in a match and sentinels won first masters therefore bbg were champions of masters 1
how is my logic wrong. g2 beat the teams which OP is saying are better in PLAYOFFS
Team A beat team B
Team B beat team C
So team A > C does not work my friend. I'm trying to defend you because you forgot the fact that team A (G2) also directly beat team C (GMB)
that wasnt even the point of my post lol. im just saying g2 is literally the number 1 seed of eu in this tourney, and the OP is saying that worse EMEA teams are better just cuz they struggled against zeta.
no arguments with the actual truth at the end of the tunnel but when u look out the window at night and u r sleepy it isnt because the moon is a magical entity that makes you go to sleep.
bruh wtf is that logic lol. u can say any team is better than any team with that logic.
Isn't that kind of what you said since you said G2 beat fnatic who beat gambit?
I know who Gambit is (M3c rn), I was just looking from the outside and also pretty sure his BBG thing is a joke
what are you saying? g2 literally beat the teams which the op is saying are better to qualify. like i think theres a difference to beating teams in playoffs than beating teams in open qualifiers lmao. but i get it, youre from na it might take a while
it takes more ppl to explain things to you than it does to change a lightbulb i dont think im the slow one friend
g2 shat on all the teams besides fpx that the commenter mentioned. counter that lol
yet u replied again at least counter my argument. mf thinks losing in playoffs is the same scenario as losing in open quals LMAO
bro M3C came from an exhausting 4 hour match against fnatic and had to show everything while G2 was chilling in lower bracket and waiting
wait fr? its almost as if that wasnt their own fault for losing prior omg!!! wait wait wait next time count the amount of hours ur favourite team sleeps and get ready to pull out this dogshit excuse again
are you trolling?
what does that have to do with my argument, I never said M3C deserves to be here instead of G2, but sometimes u get unlucky with how things go. if FNC lost that game to M3C (which M3C lost by 0.02 seconds) the story wouldve been COMPLETLY different, FNC wouldve most likely lost to G2 in lowers and everyone would say how bad FNC is and how insane M3C is, you guys are weighting those OT wins wayy too high when everything it takes sometimes is an insane play or a whiff for a team to make it or to not make it
oh so ur argument is that fnc got 'lucky' with their win? lmao that makes it worse, they lost period. luck happens for both sides, the end line is that they lost and suffered the consequences. u can use the excuse of luck for everything lol
no its not, are you even trying to understand me?
FNC and M3C were head to head on the same level, it was a perfectly balanced match, one has to lose tho and whoever lost got hard nerfed, Im just saying that if GMB won instead of losing by 0.02 people would have a complete different view of them even tho it doesnt change that the performance was excellent
but they didnt win that round? why? simply cuz they were too late in killing fnc and couldnt defuse the spike earlier. that has nothing to do with luck, thats simply gmb's fault for reacting too late. fnc WON PERIOD how do u not understand that lol. and like i said, whether they were tired against g2 or not, it was their fault for losing.
We are talking about this tourney. DRX destroyed this team and G2 is struggling.
mf explain how gambit lost a map to a jp team gambit was struggling vs jp and won masters then
exactly,so why you judge off of 1 series,zeta played great,this was only warmup for g2
Maybe every team have a good day and a bad day today Zeta has a good day....their aim is so on point and they are playing so well while they were playing like shit during their match with DRX
You and your alts spreading the almighty, "rock paper scissors" type of logic. Insane. Let the world know how powerful that argument is
No worries. First game for G2. While Zeta has been warming up for multiple days. Also G2 is scrappy team. Win is all that matters.
COPIUM
My ass they fell off. I'm the first one who underrated ZETA, I usually bauted here recently but fuck, this guys got good after DRX raped them