0

Tie breaker explained with football

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
22-70013242

Some people say that the current decision of vtc pacific on the 4 team tie breaker situation(rrq,t1,tln,ns) is right.

But It's highly controversial due to this reason

[The decision] Excluding rrq from the tie breaker with map differential and tie breaking with the rest

This is high unlikely to be fair in the sports-history point of view

Historicaly if you choose one tie breaking rule you always end with in that rule

For an example look at this years 24-25 UEFA champions league group league stage

There are 5 teams with 15 points and they were differed by there goal differences

Even though milan won real madrid by 3-1, milan was below real madrid because the goal differential was lower then madrid

So, the claim that only rrq should be removed from tie breaker is quite wrong in the sports way point of view tln should also be removed due to map differentials

There are many cases witch one rule differed all teams with that rule but I can't find a single case where "one rule differs just one team" and moved to the next differential rule

#2
1243
0
Frags
+

oh wow, i didnt know. people convinced me otherwise but it seems riot is doing things differently from traditional sports.

#4
BabyWizard
0
Frags
+

Hiya :3 Didn't know you were brazilian

#6
1243
0
Frags
+

im not, im just doing whatever. i feel sickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk today. fucking sore throat.
hi :3

#7
BabyWizard
0
Frags
+

Oh damn get better pookie :(

#3
bees
0
Frags
+

how is it "wrong" just because it's different from another sport

also NS is dropping out immediately anyway lbr

#5
22-70013242
0
Frags
+

I'm not saying the decision it self is wrong, It's controversial. But I've seen people saying that "Historicaly" it was always this way.

#11
Ikasw
1
Frags
+

you said "this is wrong from a sporting point of view" stick to your statement

#12
22-70013242
0
Frags
+

What I'm saying is that If they claim e-sports is different from traditional sports it's acceptable , but if e-sport is actually just a part of the whole flow then it's wrong.

#8
GuGengKwaMueng
3
Frags
+

New account for NS, nt

#9
Kurisusf
0
Frags
+

What really matters in this case is wtv the rulebook says and the fact that 4+ way tie must be reduced to 2-3 teams and then be resolved with the corresponding tie-breaker is clear. What is not clear is HOW you reduce to 2-3 teams, does the team with best map diff gets 1st or does the one with worst gets last? do both apply at the same time? So I dont see how is excluding RRQ is controversial, rather the controversy is WHY just RRQ.

#10
Notbaka
0
Frags
+

Which Milan cause AC is mid except for Leao and Hernandez

#13
gamergirl
1
Frags
+

what u dont get is that riot has different stages for tiebreaks, as stated per the rules

different rules, same principle

if it was madrid bayern barca psg in a group, for a throphy

they would say madrid won the first tie breaker, they win the trophy (RRQ 1st) do you want them to then decide 4th place before 2nd and 3rd?

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment