What I'm saying is that If they claim e-sports is different from traditional sports it's acceptable , but if e-sport is actually just a part of the whole flow then it's wrong.

I'm not saying the decision it self is wrong, It's controversial. But I've seen people saying that "Historicaly" it was always this way.

Some people say that the current decision of vtc pacific on the 4 team tie breaker situation(rrq,t1,tln,ns) is right.

But It's highly controversial due to this reason

[The decision] Excluding rrq from the tie breaker with map differential and tie breaking with the rest

This is high unlikely to be fair in the sports-history point of view

Historicaly if you choose one tie breaking rule you always end with in that rule

For an example look at this years 24-25 UEFA champions league group league stage

There are 5 teams with 15 points and they were differed by there goal differences

Even though milan won real madrid by 3-1, milan was below real madrid because the goal differential was lower then madrid

So, the claim that only rrq should be removed from tie breaker is quite wrong in the sports way point of view tln should also be removed due to map differentials

There are many cases witch one rule differed all teams with that rule but I can't find a single case where "one rule differs just one team" and moved to the next differential rule