0

Rankers

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
TheLegend27

This take might get hate and be perceived as braindead but it’s just an OPINION not a fact so please comment your opinion while being nice. I believe Rankers doing this well just shows just how bad valorant is as an Esport. In other esports there is a clear gap between pros and people who play the top level of ranked, where even though they may be mechanically gifted the strategy involved in the game will keep them from ascending. In Valorant it just seems like the gap between pros and ranked players isn’t that far off because mechanics outweigh everything in Val. It’s the same reason why we are seeing NRG struggle, although FNS’s strats are good he doesn’t have the firepower to compete, and it’s becoming more apparent the teams that succeed have an IGL who can frag. In a game like CS when you watch Faceit it’s easy to tell who is a pro and who isn’t, but when you watch 10 mans, or even high level ranked games in Valorant it would be virtually impossible to tell who the high level pros are unless you had like Aspas or Zekken whose mechanics are insane. I think Valorant will die as an esport because quite literally all that matters is having good mechanics and even mediocre strategy with top mechanics will always beat good strategy but not having all players skilled mechanically. Imo it’s the reason why all the games are coin flips nowadays and you can’t predict the winner accurately anymore. Sorry for the yap.

TLDR: Mechanics mean everything in Val, good strategy isn’t as important as having 5 mechanically gifted players. If you want to win as an org just invest in mechanics and kick out anyone who can’t keep up mechanically regardless of how tactical they may be.

#2
madaj
10
Frags
+

W paragraph

#3
welikefortniteandvalorant
2
Frags
+

PRX never won a trophy but yeah i kinda agree wit u

#4
washedradiant
17
Frags
+

your wrong though. rankers have p0ppin and inspire which are insanely smart and have relatively weaker mechanics. eggster also just does smart plays that are just impossible to counter. but yea val is a lot of rng bullshit, but thats how hero shooters are.

Its not like rankers are dumb its just they use unorthodox agents which is why everyone is suprised

#8
TheLegend27
0
Frags
+

They are smart but when orgs think of smart they think of players who learned from grinding tier 2 or experience from being pro in another game. I feel like Rankers is showing tier 2 in Val really doesn’t matter to an extent, because M80 has had the best strats 2 years in a row but have crumbled in the finals to teams who had better overall mechanics, not really strats.

#10
kaninv
0
Frags
+

you can have great strats in any esport and if your players are getting diffed in actual fights and choking because of pressure, you will lose no matter what. saying t2 "doesn't really matter to an extent (in valorant)" because of that is crazy to me

#25
TheLegend27
0
Frags
+

Ye I kind’ve explained that bad, sry english isn’t my first language so sometimes what I type may come out weird. When I say tier 2 doesn’t matter to an extent, I meant in terms of finding talent. I feel like you can find talent in tier 3 or ranked that is very mechanically gifted and they would be more beneficial for your team rather than someone from tier 2 who understands the game well but doesn’t have elite mechanics. I hope that makes sense

#27
washedradiant
1
Frags
+

I agree that mechanics are probably the most important, but you cant downplay strategy. Furia are all mechanical ranked demons but have bad strategies. Team liquid are worse mechanically than heretics but 3-0d them and same with fut. PRX are all mechanical demons and got eliminated quickly. Rankers are just better strategical and mechanically than some of these teams

#15
cozylotus
-1
Frags
+

This is the third week of split 1, and you're comparing their success to m80 making ascension grand finals twice and losing. Like at least wait until split 2

#24
TheLegend27
1
Frags
+

I wasn’t comparing their success, I was just bringing up how the strategically best team over the last years has lost due to mechanics. This was me saying that at the end of the day mechanics matters the most

#5
Elso
-5
Frags
+

not reading all that

#6
Laundry
9
Frags
+

Idk about ur point with it just being better mechanics. If you play the game 12 hours a day course ur gonna have good game sense. I think it highlights individual skill over team play, and also that ur point that TOP ranked (I mean like consistently top 10, not just peak #1 or consistent top 500) has pro play is a smaller gap then most realize.

#13
TheLegend27
0
Frags
+

Ye I agree, I just think that the 12 hours a day should have a major difference depending on what it’s used for. Players may rank top 10 every act by playing 12 hours a day of ranked. But their mechanics shouldn’t be able to make the gap so close with those players playing 6-8 hours of scrims plus individual practice. It just makes me wonder if pro players are actually practicing optimally, like maybe just mindlessly scrimming and VOD reviewing those scrims may not be the best way to improve

#7
kaninv
8
Frags
+

clear gap between pros and people who play the top level of ranked

disagree comparing it to CS and saying this, because in CS you have these examples:
vitality when adding zywoo = immediately became world class team when they were mid before
spirit when adding donk = immediate trophies
g2 adding m0nesy = immediately a top team
eternal fire building around xantares = t1 immediately

These teams were not as good and their calling (in my opinion) as other teams such as na'vi and faze, but they just added an insane player and that player farmed. I think it's extremely disingenuous to say that rankers just had better mechanical players when I firsthand saw them have better utility and absolutely call insane flank timings on Cubert time and time again. On top of that, not to do a severe glazing infraction but nightz, ion and cane have been top1 destroying Radiant with insane stats similar to the players I mentioned before from CS. Because the game is so new and teams are still very nepo from previous esports titles + and you can't add young players like you can in CS (16+ for T1), this rankers team actually had all 3 of those players at once, so I really don't think it's surprising they're doing well.

#17
TheLegend27
0
Frags
+

Ye that was mb on generalizing the CS stuff I was just tryna make it more understandable when I was talking about how little the skill gap is when comparing pros to top level ranked players. But for those CS teams ur saying adding 1 player is what drastically changed their results its because they need at least one carry, the other 3/4 members usually don’t change because they understand the strategy even though they may not be that mechanically gifted. In valorant you can’t just do the add 1 guy and ur team will magically ascend, unless you’ have 4 mechanically good players and are missing 1. All 5 players have to be good mechanically, and I feel like Rankers are showing that, because any of their 5 players can pop off whereas the teams they are facing have weak links mechanically which allows them to exploit sites and kind of just run teams over, in addition to their unique tactical-ranked style play

#21
kaninv
0
Frags
+

But for those CS teams ur saying adding 1 player is what drastically changed their results its because they need at least one carry, the other 3/4 members usually don’t change because they understand the strategy even though they may not be that mechanically gifted

because CS has been out for so long, more and the top players have completely filled out to all be mechanically gifted if you ask me so that's a big difference between Val and CS, and why you may think strats matter more. not saying strats don't matter obviously, because they do, but they also had more time to weed out the bad players. Look at the top CS teams right now and who is doing well, obviously Spirit is doing well because donk can solo carry but vitality, navi, g2 (to an extent), EF, faze, mouz (before -siuhy) all were known to be good because they didn't have any weak links. Also, Val has totally made teams where they just added mechanically gifted players and then built up strats from there, which I very much think is what rankers is doing. two good examples is Heretics rebuild and the recent Vitality rebuild.

because any of their 5 players can pop off whereas the teams they are facing have weak links mechanically which allows them to exploit sites and kind of just run teams over

this happens in any esport, but I think it's personified by this rankers team because of this point I made "nightz, ion and cane have been top1 destroying Radiant with insane stats similar to the players I mentioned before from CS"

#23
TheLegend27
0
Frags
+

I mean what you’re saying is basically just agreeing with me, Heretics and Vitality’s rebuild basically just focused on getting 5 mechanically gifted players and putting them together, and it worked out great for them. I’m not saying the players have to be from ranked I’m just saying focus on getting 5 players from any level whether it be tier 1/2/3 or ranked who have amazing mechanics and seem like a decent understanding of the game. Because I feel like strats aren’t that important and can be added later

#28
229fn
0
Frags
+

but if you look at Heretics' rebuild it was about getting 4 insane tier 2 rookies with goated aim and then them all coming together under Boo's leadership and experience

The same thing happened with MIBR, except Aspas was the experienced player and he brought raw confidence to the table, which is arguably just as important as game knowledge - unless you're G2

#9
UBClears
1
Frags
+

This is the allure of Valorant. Being able to grind ranked and have that success translate to the pro level. That's why they made Premier. That's why they nerfed Jett, Chamber, and Raze, and added Clove who is a duelist.

This is exactly what Riot wants for the pro scene.

#11
urmad
1
Frags
+

good teams either have insane carries/aim or good strats/teamwork. the best teams have both

#12
77_sTuna
1
Frags
+

Could be true. I see it as a positive, unique thing. While the majority of pros are still less successful ex-pros from other games, I like where talent finding is going with more and more top ranked players who actually play the game getting attention from teams. Though, most of them will have to wait a few years to be able to play. I like the idea of players whose first FPS is Val, rising to the top of ranked, possibly even the pro scene. Also rankers are too fun to watch

#14
Twentytwo
0
Frags
+

If mechanics was everything in valorant, Chinese teams would be masters and champs winners every year. You think Spirit is still successful without donk and shiro?

#19
TheLegend27
1
Frags
+

I feel like every year it’s becoming more and more geared towards mechanics, because unless a new map comes out, there isn’t much to explore on the old maps in terms of strategy since the agent comps aren’t being changed that much. Which is also why Rankers are successful because they have a unique comp and aren’t trying to force it to catch the opponent by surprise they are just genuinely playing a weird comp that has the agents they are best on

#32
Twentytwo
1
Frags
+

I think its because valorant has info agents, outcalling in valorant is way harder because of these agents. If you know where i am on the map and i know where you are, at that point duels are just about who has the better mechanics, if valorant didn't have info sentinels or initiators i think the game wouldn't just rely on mechanics. Also the game is fairly new if you look back at Cs 1.6, it was mostly about mechanics. Once valorant has its own players and not the cs heads and everyone has great mechanics the game will just cycle back to who has strategic depth.

#16
fatdaddy
2
Frags
+

put Rankers in Americas Franchising and see how wrong you are.

#20
TheLegend27
2
Frags
+

I don’t think they’d be the best team but I promise you they wouldn’t be the worst franchise team.

#30
fatdaddy
0
Frags
+

i agree, but they would easily be the worst Tier1 North American team

#18
oliv-
0
Frags
+

bro what lmao i'd argue cs is more mechanic carry more than in valorant. xantares literally dropping almost 50 kills to save his team from getting demolished, donk , zywoo , u can carry with pure mechanics easier than in valorant.

#22
TheLegend27
0
Frags
+

The carries that happen still rely on good IGLing and team play with utility to set up the star player in CS. In valorant carries happen, but you need all the players to be mechanically gifted in Val to win nowadays, in CS that’s not really the case it’s still pretty strat heavy.

#26
Manaphy
2
Frags
+

Rankers being good isn't only reliant on them outaiming people. Also, an esport lacking tactical depth is fine. If Rocket League is able to survive despite its lack of depth and the little amount of effort and care Epic puts into its then Val is just fine.

#29
tygers99
0
Frags
+

Maybe Rankers is just a good team with potential, and every player sits on an agent they have 1000s of hours on. I agree that their mechs are whats winning them games, but I think a team without a good strategy would go nowhere and you have to give them thier due.

#31
tjpz
-3
Frags
+

Jobs bro jobs

#33
Hyxagon
0
Frags
+

tbh, you are right that just having mechanically cracked players can make you a top team, you still need good strats and team coordination to be number 1. a team with the top 5 aimers in the world wouldnt stand much of a chance against the 100th best aimers with really good strats

#34
livefrmhollywood
0
Frags
+

A major difference between high-level ranked in Val vs CS is that Val has almost no cheaters. There's no separate FACEIT, you just queue ranked, and that's it. There's at least one pro (tier 1 or 2) in almost every ranked game Eggsterr plays.

There's also still an enormous lack of good training/practice for pretty much all esports, and playing thousands of hours of ranked against legitimately good players helps a ton with that.

That said, the top tier 1 teams know how to play against the aggressive style, which is to match the aggression. They'll go fast, then back to slow, and Rankers will have to start guessing and not have the util to keep up with the slower rounds.

#35
thenutoriousPRO
-4
Frags
+

its true but they arent even that good mechanically look at ion2x bro cant aim for shit

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment