HEAR ME OUT. Since Champs existed i don't think there ever was a winner who was the best team of the year. Ofc the champs winner deserves it but i do thinks it's a matter of circumstance rather than consistency
Thats every game, you can be good for the entire year but if youre a little worse on that one day then youll lose, vice versa too. Best teams also need to be the most consistent teams imo.
And at their peak, teams like EG and PRX hadnt peaked either, its hard to say which is why I said arguably. Though I dont think PRX peak is higher than FNC peak, but I think EG could match up.
ignore my flair for a minute, can you just justify this take for me? I legitimately don't get it, considering how they performed at champs and who they played.
For me personally the way FPX played was smarter and better for the whole year than Loud for the year (Including regionals) But LOUD was undoubtedly the best team at champs, but not for the entire year IMO
ignore my flair for a minute, can you just justify this take for me? I legitimately don't get it, considering how they performed at champs and who they played.
Ok Loud were def the best team ITW at the end but they also were grouped by optic at copenhagen so going into champs they were NOT the favorites to win it all
The team that wins champs IS THE BEST ITW. Everyone knows champs is the biggest of the year. So the best team will make sure to be in peak form during champs.