58 -> 377
34 -> 183
27 -> 106
62 -> 461
83 -> ?
someone find the number pls
actually its 676, i used my brain. i know, im a frickin geniuth! 😎
58 -> 377
34 -> 183
27 -> 106
62 -> 461
83 -> ?
I will refer to the left number as X and right as Y
1) ones digit
X's ones digit is 1 larger than Y's ones digit (8-1 = 7, 4-1 = 3 and on)
so for 83, it will be 2 --> ??2
fairly straightforward
2) tens digit
first X's tens digit(5) + first Y's tens digit(3) = 8, thus 34 --> 183
5+3+2 = 10, 106 and on
so for 83, it will be 5+3+2+6+ 8 = 24, ?42
3) hundreds digit
genearlly, Y's hundreds digit is 2 less than X's.
but we see an exception: 27 --> 106
if we go back to how we got the tens digit, it was 5+3+2, 10. here, we only used the 0 for our solution, and dumped 1. I though that 1 back there should come back here, making it 2-2+1 = 1, 27 --> 106
so for 83, it should be 8-2 = 6, but remember, we dumped the 2 from 24 in tens digit, so 6+2 =8
THEREFORE, ANSWER = 842
Now, there are some faulty reasoning in my solution
This is just a big waste of time if you dont have the 'correct' aswner by whoever elaborated the question
bruh i appreciated your effort, i was just commenting that this kind of question opens the door for diverse anwsers that only people who made know
Do you have anymore information or context? I think this is impossible to determine what 83 would transform into.
It doesn't follow a linear pattern exactly (nor does it seem to fit other basic curves) which is what I would expect from the whole numbers -> y = 9.4547x - 146.08 with a R^2 of R² = 0.986.
This means 83 would be 638.66 which isn't a whole number either.
I would guess there is some hidden arithmetic equation at play. potentially based on the order of the numbers you gave
it would be devious to just keyboard slam a bunch of random numbers and say find the pattern
anyone can post a bunch of numbers that trend in the same direction doesn't mean there's an intended pattern in there