sz 2-1 oq
completed
... 15 more matches
Thursday, December 8th
2:30 AM EST
Patch 5.12
OQA ban Breeze; SZ ban Pearl; OQA pick Ascent; SZ pick Icebox; OQA ban Bind; SZ ban Fracture; Haven remains
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Maps/Stats
13
OQ academy
8 /
5
Ascent
PICK
45:11
SCARZ
4 /
5
9
OQA 
SZ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 1.73 1.04 | 248 283 206 | 21 14 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 10 3 7 | +7 +8 -1 | 64% 75% 50% | 166 207 117 | 19% 28% 9% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.36 1.48 1.22 | 204 216 191 | 15 8 7 | / 13 6 7 / | 18 10 8 | +2 +2 0 | 82% 83% 80% | 141 151 128 | 30% 32% 26% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.19 0.67 1.80 | 252 172 348 | 18 6 12 | / 15 9 6 / | 5 3 2 | +3 -3 +6 | 68% 58% 80% | 152 106 208 | 16% 12% 19% | 7 4 3 | 5 5 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
1.12 1.65 0.48 | 183 245 110 | 16 12 4 | / 12 4 8 / | 2 1 1 | +4 +8 -4 | 64% 75% 50% | 123 157 82 | 33% 34% 30% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.61 0.93 0.22 | 121 149 90 | 9 7 2 | / 15 6 9 / | 4 2 2 | -6 +1 -7 | 64% 75% 50% | 81 98 62 | 18% 27% 11% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.54 1.94 1.21 | 326 388 275 | 24 13 11 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 4 3 | +8 +7 +1 | 73% 80% 67% | 221 272 179 | 26% 28% 23% | 6 3 3 | 1 1 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.16 1.26 1.08 | 207 222 196 | 17 9 8 | / 14 6 8 / | 10 5 5 | +3 +3 0 | 82% 90% 75% | 138 153 127 | 32% 32% 32% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.86 1.06 0.70 | 121 119 123 | 10 4 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 14 12 2 | -4 -1 -3 | 73% 90% 58% | 79 75 83 | 25% 13% 38% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
|
0.72 1.05 0.45 | 193 234 161 | 13 8 5 | / 18 7 11 / | 3 2 1 | -5 +1 -6 | 41% 60% 25% | 133 150 118 | 38% 56% 28% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
|
0.50 0.65 0.37 | 113 144 89 | 5 4 1 | / 17 8 9 / | 16 8 8 | -12 -4 -8 | 68% 90% 50% | 86 98 77 | 18% 35% 5% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.95 1.43 1.19 | 247 210 285 | 55 23 32 | / 44 24 20 / | 17 10 7 | +11 -1 +12 | 71% 70% 73% | 152 132 171 | 20% 14% 24% | 15 8 7 | 9 9 0 | +6 -1 +7 | |
|
|
1.14 0.95 1.04 | 189 194 183 | 45 25 20 | / 44 20 24 / | 18 7 11 | +1 +5 -4 | 62% 70% 55% | 125 143 108 | 24% 28% 20% | 4 2 2 | 7 3 4 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.88 1.09 0.99 | 192 177 211 | 41 18 23 | / 47 24 23 / | 30 13 17 | -6 -6 0 | 68% 70% 67% | 132 124 141 | 25% 29% 22% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
|
1.27 0.63 0.95 | 201 253 150 | 49 32 17 | / 47 20 27 / | 7 6 1 | +2 +12 -10 | 62% 73% 52% | 134 166 101 | 39% 39% 41% | 6 1 5 | 6 2 4 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.39 0.69 | 135 162 111 | 29 19 10 | / 48 19 29 / | 21 11 10 | -19 0 -19 | 62% 70% 55% | 89 104 73 | 31% 36% 24% | 5 3 2 | 6 2 4 | -1 +1 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.67 1.15 1.41 | 293 337 249 | 70 42 28 | / 45 20 25 / | 10 6 4 | +25 +22 +3 | 68% 73% 64% | 194 221 166 | 35% 38% 32% | 9 5 4 | 5 3 2 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
|
1.16 1.02 1.09 | 234 246 219 | 53 27 26 | / 46 22 24 / | 9 5 4 | +7 +5 +2 | 67% 70% 64% | 155 170 140 | 24% 26% 22% | 12 7 5 | 10 5 5 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
|
0.97 0.92 0.94 | 191 194 190 | 41 21 20 | / 44 23 21 / | 27 15 12 | -3 -2 -1 | 71% 73% 70% | 131 136 126 | 24% 22% 26% | 3 1 2 | 9 5 4 | -6 -4 -2 | |
|
|
1.06 0.79 0.92 | 161 187 137 | 36 21 15 | / 44 22 22 / | 34 22 12 | -8 -1 -7 | 77% 85% 70% | 104 115 93 | 26% 29% 22% | 3 2 1 | 5 3 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
0.96 0.82 0.89 | 134 120 148 | 30 12 18 | / 40 17 23 / | 28 21 7 | -10 -5 -5 | 67% 73% 61% | 89 85 94 | 18% 13% 23% | 5 0 5 | 5 2 3 | 0 -2 +2 |
8
OQ academy
5 /
3
Icebox
PICK
42:49
SCARZ
7 /
6
13
OQA
SZ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.13 0.85 1.34 | 227 181 262 | 15 5 10 | / 15 8 7 / | 10 5 5 | 0 -3 +3 | 81% 78% 83% | 145 114 169 | 23% 14% 28% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
1.08 0.92 1.20 | 185 157 206 | 14 6 8 | / 13 6 7 / | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | 52% 56% 50% | 134 128 139 | 37% 31% 41% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
0.61 0.60 0.62 | 137 152 126 | 9 4 5 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 1 6 | -8 -4 -4 | 52% 56% 50% | 95 105 88 | 32% 50% 21% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
0.60 0.58 0.62 | 203 229 184 | 14 7 7 | / 20 9 11 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -2 -4 | 48% 44% 50% | 123 144 107 | 42% 31% 55% | 3 0 3 | 3 2 1 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
|
0.45 0.40 0.49 | 117 87 141 | 7 2 5 | / 18 7 11 / | 6 3 3 | -11 -5 -6 | 52% 33% 67% | 86 69 99 | 25% 20% 28% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.81 1.91 1.68 | 375 428 306 | 30 19 11 | / 13 8 5 / | 4 3 1 | +17 +11 +6 | 90% 92% 89% | 244 271 208 | 34% 35% 33% | 5 3 2 | 2 2 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
|
1.34 1.33 1.36 | 246 279 203 | 19 11 8 | / 11 7 4 / | 0 0 0 | +8 +4 +4 | 81% 75% 89% | 160 180 134 | 31% 28% 38% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
|
1.15 1.30 0.93 | 164 173 153 | 13 8 5 | / 11 6 5 / | 6 6 0 | +2 +2 0 | 90% 92% 89% | 90 92 89 | 23% 13% 42% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.95 0.70 1.28 | 159 95 245 | 10 3 7 | / 11 7 4 / | 7 4 3 | -1 -4 +3 | 62% 58% 67% | 104 69 150 | 19% 20% 19% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
0.83 0.67 1.04 | 168 123 229 | 11 4 7 | / 13 8 5 / | 10 8 2 | -2 -4 +2 | 57% 58% 56% | 111 88 141 | 32% 40% 25% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 |
13
OQ academy
9 /
4
Haven
46:45
SCARZ
3 /
7
10
OQA
SZ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.26 1.32 1.20 | 261 270 252 | 22 12 10 | / 14 7 7 / | 2 2 0 | +8 +5 +3 | 65% 75% 55% | 157 172 140 | 21% 17% 25% | 5 2 3 | 2 2 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
|
1.10 1.40 0.78 | 216 278 150 | 19 13 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 4 0 | +4 +6 -2 | 74% 92% 55% | 154 191 113 | 44% 48% 39% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.99 1.52 0.43 | 167 233 96 | 13 10 3 | / 15 6 9 / | 11 6 5 | -2 +4 -6 | 70% 92% 45% | 99 138 56 | 54% 53% 60% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
|
0.97 0.49 1.49 | 234 155 322 | 17 6 11 | / 17 10 7 / | 5 2 3 | 0 -4 +4 | 70% 67% 73% | 158 111 210 | 18% 16% 20% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
|
0.65 0.70 0.60 | 134 133 135 | 10 5 5 | / 17 8 9 / | 6 3 3 | -7 -3 -4 | 70% 75% 64% | 78 89 66 | 21% 25% 17% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.71 1.98 1.47 | 311 332 293 | 27 15 12 | / 14 5 9 / | 3 1 2 | +13 +10 +3 | 74% 64% 83% | 206 232 183 | 33% 33% 33% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
1.12 1.15 1.09 | 206 241 174 | 18 9 9 | / 16 8 8 / | 12 8 4 | +2 +1 +1 | 74% 73% 75% | 133 155 114 | 34% 38% 29% | 2 2 0 | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.85 1.14 0.59 | 123 147 101 | 10 5 5 | / 15 5 10 / | 7 5 2 | -5 0 -5 | 65% 73% 58% | 86 111 63 | 12% 9% 17% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
0.84 1.04 0.67 | 198 247 155 | 13 8 5 | / 17 9 8 / | 7 2 5 | -4 -1 -3 | 74% 73% 75% | 142 172 113 | 14% 11% 21% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
|
0.43 0.27 0.57 | 131 81 177 | 10 3 7 | / 19 9 10 / | 2 1 1 | -9 -6 -3 | 48% 55% 42% | 87 67 106 | 16% 19% 14% | 2 1 1 | 8 3 5 | -6 -2 -4 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
All you see is the results. They weren't bad during the game and were pretty disciplined. OQA are a good team as well. You say F/A but:
Hate: ex-TNL, ex-Damwon
CoSa: ex-DRX Academy, ex-TNL (QS)
Jeong-Hi: ex-Maru, ex-Damwon
NakJi: ex-Maru
WIX: ex-Maru
You also don't know what teams they have beaten behind the scenes. I guarantee you you'd be surprised if you heard of them. I assume Seulgi knows what I'm talking about - there's a reason he said SZ 2-1, a scoreline I was predicting too.
???? what
Both teams were playing decently fine, yeah there were more mistakes made but this is Tier 2 Valorant not fucking Masters, and even in Tier 1 play we still see shit like XSET vs Leviatan. Both teams had good coordination and although their tactical decision making wasn't DRX/FPX/OpTic-level their strategic play was good and they definitely knew how to play the comps they were running. I would say Scarz were nervous with how easily their util was coaxed out from them, though.
They played fine.
they beat EDG in scrims
sometimes we need to forget scrims results that happened earlier, come back down to earth and realize that they just lost to OQA, and never did anything in officials
unless ur tryna say OQA can punch in the weight of teams like DRX and are a force to reckon with
I didnt predict a OQA win, but now that they did win I am 100000% not gonna make statements like SZ > CR until the two teams go at it in a bo3
They beat more than just EDG lol.
never did anything in officials
PRX and ZETA never did anything in officials until M1 2022, what's your point lol? Just because they did not have results does not mean they won't have results in future. ESL isn't even a high-stakes tournament.
ur tryna say OQA can punch in the weight of teams like DRX and are a force to reckon with
:eyes: Clueless he lacks the critical information kekw, maybe not for OQA, but I never said OQA is as good as DRX. I just said they're a good team.
that they did win I am 100000% not gonna make statements like SZ > CR until the two teams go at it in a bo3
CR lost Rion, Astell, and Munchkin lol. Their best players are Meiy and Popogachi. Meiy is the only really good player. Makiba is hot trash.
gg
zeka quite good, jemking very good
SZ making a good comeback but unfortunately was exploited by OQA's contact-heavy attacking playstyle, and whether it was nerves or something else, expended utility very quickly and easily, giving a ton of value to OQA's defaults. OQA definitely playing smart too, had some good reads and good rounds. This reminds me of an OpTic-esque playstyle by incorporating contact and occasional risky plays vs an exploitable and easily telegraphed DRX style team.
i expect to see a lower-bracket run
Discord