i am biased here since LOUD got trashed on it and now they are permabanning it on Champions, so i wanna know what you guys think. actually before Champions i already thought it wasn't a good way of deciding the best team in the year since the map got just released.
like, imagine FIFA decided to add another goalpost for each team right before the World Cup. this isn't a good anology, even because football rules don't change much, but it's to show it might not be fair changing things that much before the most important championship in the year. how can a team prove to be worthy of the title of the best in the year when they only adapted fast to something that got just released yk
imagine your teacher tells you to study for an exam that will happen tomorrow when he didn't tell you about that one before. if you don't go well enough, does it mean you are bad? there are so many variables involved. when a map is released, there is a transient of every team learning related to that one - that transient doesn't mean much in a short term imo.