Dno what to make of this matchup but I feel like 100T especially counters LG's playstyle.
Running accuracy changes
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
235 166 | 16 6 10 | / 16 7 9 / | 3 1 2 | 0 -1 +1 | 130 95 | 14% 0% 24% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
212 198 | 12 1 11 | / 17 7 10 / | 2 2 0 | -5 -6 +1 | 129 115 | 41% 0% 56% | 4 0 4 | 3 2 1 | +1 -2 +3 | |||
|
176 154 | 11 2 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 2 2 0 | -5 -5 0 | 99 84 | 35% 20% 38% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
176 126 | 13 4 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 0 0 0 | -3 -3 0 | 113 85 | 23% 11% 35% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
167 84 | 9 4 5 | / 16 7 9 / | 5 2 3 | -7 -3 -4 | 122 62 | 10% 10% 11% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
356 93 | 24 18 6 | / 13 9 4 / | 4 1 3 | +11 +9 +2 | 195 53 | 23% 22% 24% | 4 2 2 | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
236 79 | 17 11 6 | / 12 8 4 / | 5 4 1 | +5 +3 +2 | 154 47 | 26% 24% 29% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
224 94 | 15 7 8 | / 8 8 0 / | 8 6 2 | +7 -1 +8 | 140 62 | 28% 26% 31% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
223 138 | 14 5 9 | / 14 9 5 / | 3 1 2 | 0 -4 +4 | 118 62 | 16% 14% 17% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
170 81 | 11 5 6 | / 14 10 4 / | 6 5 1 | -3 -5 +2 | 123 52 | 13% 15% 11% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
242 174 | 51 18 33 | / 49 24 25 / | 12 7 5 | +2 -6 +8 | 139 96 | 27% 16% 34% | 13 4 9 | 7 4 3 | +6 0 +6 | |||
|
237 131 | 55 26 29 | / 44 20 24 / | 16 6 10 | +11 +6 +5 | 149 81 | 30% 28% 33% | 8 5 3 | 4 1 3 | +4 +4 0 | |||
|
210 139 | 46 18 28 | / 46 23 23 / | 16 7 9 | 0 -5 +5 | 129 84 | 23% 15% 27% | 5 2 3 | 8 3 5 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
200 138 | 42 14 28 | / 47 22 25 / | 21 10 11 | -5 -8 +3 | 119 72 | 39% 36% 41% | 4 3 1 | 5 2 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
176 87 | 35 18 17 | / 41 21 20 / | 32 14 18 | -6 -3 -3 | 129 73 | 12% 12% 11% | 3 0 3 | 5 2 3 | -2 -2 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
275 109 | 59 34 25 | / 46 27 19 / | 11 4 7 | +13 +7 +6 | 163 65 | 20% 16% 29% | 9 6 3 | 7 3 4 | +2 +3 -1 | |||
|
218 114 | 50 23 27 | / 48 28 20 / | 11 7 4 | +2 -5 +7 | 143 69 | 23% 20% 27% | 2 1 1 | 7 2 5 | -5 -1 -4 | |||
|
217 114 | 45 24 21 | / 48 27 21 / | 14 8 6 | -3 -3 0 | 141 66 | 16% 23% 13% | 12 6 6 | 8 3 5 | +4 +3 +1 | |||
|
194 103 | 37 16 21 | / 51 29 22 / | 16 7 9 | -14 -13 -1 | 121 58 | 17% 18% 15% | 4 2 2 | 11 4 7 | -7 -2 -5 | |||
|
181 75 | 36 21 15 | / 36 25 11 / | 22 10 12 | 0 -4 +4 | 134 62 | 25% 28% 20% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
282 133 | 23 12 11 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 3 3 | +9 +4 +5 | 175 79 | 35% 45% 29% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
261 133 | 21 10 11 | / 19 11 8 / | 5 3 2 | +2 -1 +3 | 142 70 | 27% 20% 36% | 5 2 3 | 2 0 2 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
202 127 | 16 5 11 | / 16 9 7 / | 10 5 5 | 0 -4 +4 | 121 59 | 31% 24% 40% | 2 2 0 | 4 1 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |||
|
173 67 | 13 9 4 | / 15 8 7 / | 12 4 8 | -2 +1 -3 | 112 48 | 17% 21% 13% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
173 105 | 13 6 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 8 4 4 | -4 -4 0 | 121 71 | 31% 29% 32% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
267 184 | 20 5 15 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 2 3 | +1 -4 +5 | 168 105 | 21% 17% 24% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
250 141 | 18 10 8 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | 150 76 | 18% 32% 12% | 7 4 3 | 3 1 2 | +4 +3 +1 | |||
|
204 125 | 19 8 11 | / 16 8 8 / | 1 0 1 | +3 0 +3 | 138 85 | 17% 9% 25% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
178 81 | 14 9 5 | / 14 9 5 / | 8 2 6 | 0 0 0 | 162 93 | 33% 43% 25% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
141 92 | 10 3 7 | / 19 10 9 / | 9 4 5 | -9 -7 -2 | 96 60 | 14% 15% 14% | 1 0 1 | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
254 198 | 18 7 11 | / 13 6 7 / | 5 2 3 | +5 +1 +4 | 146 107 | 20% 16% 22% | 4 2 2 | 2 2 0 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
254 134 | 19 10 9 | / 14 5 9 / | 10 3 7 | +5 +5 0 | 154 80 | 31% 27% 38% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
223 135 | 15 7 8 | / 15 6 9 / | 9 3 6 | 0 +1 -1 | 138 78 | 52% 62% 45% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
222 153 | 17 6 11 | / 13 6 7 / | 5 2 3 | +4 0 +4 | 138 89 | 24% 20% 26% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
188 113 | 13 5 8 | / 10 6 4 / | 15 8 7 | +3 -1 +4 | 155 113 | 8% 4% 11% | 3 0 3 | 4 2 2 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
264 107 | 16 8 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 6 3 3 | -1 -2 +1 | 162 53 | 20% 13% 39% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
230 115 | 16 9 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 | 147 69 | 17% 23% 14% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
217 83 | 13 8 5 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 2 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 154 53 | 19% 22% 15% | 2 2 0 | 4 1 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |||
|
151 66 | 13 7 6 | / 17 11 6 / | 1 1 0 | -4 -4 0 | 105 48 | 24% 19% 31% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
142 49 | 7 5 2 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 2 4 | -7 -3 -4 | 96 27 | 16% 22% 0% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
Oh for sure. It was totally to be expected. I'm just saying that a streak like that can be really beneficial to a team's mentality.
Statistically, LG have out-performed 100T when you compare the teams' last 5 games. So, it's not a sure bet by any stretch.
It's just a feeling, but I reckon 100T take the series. They're really good preppers, they adapt quickly in-game, and their backs are against the wall just from being in CH2 in the first place.
Few things here, 100T haven't played a tier 1 team since the JBL Quantum in an actual map, we have no idea how good they're looking right now. That being said, It wouldnt surprise me if theyre still in form. I think the 3 players to watch are Thief, Asuna (both a given), but also Steel. With the contact and information starving style of LG, steels ratty setups and lurks are whats going to give 100T the win, but if Steel cant do those things efficiently, it should be clean for LG
I would give LG a shot but the veto is
BAN
BAN
PICK
PICK
DECIDER
It allows 100T to ban Split. What are they going to pick? Haven? Idk but I think if LG could pick Split they'd have a 50/50 chance imo but they can't.
If LG ban bind, pick Haven. They have a chance to win though. They will have to win haven because I don't think theyll win ascent.
This matchup is overall going to come down to aproto's and thief's performances. If nitr0, asuna, and the rest of the gang shut them down, it'll be easy for them. However, aproto and thief are fairly consistent and I'd say that makes these games close. Statistically, Bind and Ascent are gonna be hard for any team to beat 100 Thieves on, but LG probably will put on a decent showing on Icebox, Split, or Haven. I'm guessing 100T is gonna win Ascent and Haven but LG will win Icebox. 2-1 100T
Asuna had a bad series let's hope he can return to form against GenG. If Asuna can return to form and everyone else can keep up what they did in this series, 100T should dominate. As for LG, they played a great game and won the clutches that 100T normally wins on Bind. Great game from Moose specifically
I have to say something, I'm not sure if i'm the only one who has noticed, but these past few weeks hiko and steel dont seem to get a long too well. Not only that but hiko has become so toxic on his stream and he was never like this before. Hiko changed a lot on my opinion and I just hope that isn't ruining their chemistry as a team.