lets be real, last 2 maps showed that DRX were better team overall. Even with Suygetsu, things would be the same
yeah guild did really well, most people aren't giving them enough credit
but still it builds into my point, if he wasn't so reliant on an op and performed just a bit better optic would have most likely won. Fpx got absolutely thrashed the last 2 maps, I really don't see how having suygetsu would have made enough of a difference to help win the last 2 maps. Just like the pervious guy mentioning yay (who ended up essentially losing the match for the rest of the team), how can everyone be so sure suygetsu would have performed really well and won the game for them?
not really, the previous guy was basically saying optic would be almost nothing without yay
yet he was the sole reason optic lost to guild
same here, people are singing praises for suygetsu acting like he would have carried the team to victory (which we have absolutely no way of knowing) despite getting absolutely hammered the last 2 maps. my point is that even if he is extremely good like yay, just like yay he could have still played poorly
Another false analogy, even if yay had a bad end result, the team comms, the roles, the set plays, the chemistry, everything else was still there. Also idk what you mean with βwhen the sub is playing goodβ when seider didnt perform. And 4 out of 5 players still made it competitive, they literally won a map
How can you say that when they didn't play with their full roster? You realize how much even 1 sub change the team chemistry and how they play? Especially when that sub can't even put similar individual performances. Its weakened individual talent + change in how the team plays. They even changed comps on Breeze for some reason. I would still give Fracture to DRX just because DRX were playing well against FPX's comp (suygetsu still way better anchor than SEIDER), but Breeze could have gone either way.
How can you say that when they didn't play with their full roster? You realize how much even 1 sub change the team chemistry and how they play? Especially when that sub can't even put similar individual performances. Its weakened individual talent + change in how the team plays. They even changed comps on Breeze for some reason. I would still give Fracture to DRX just because DRX were playing well against FPX's comp (suygetsu still way better anchor than SEIDER), but Breeze could have gone either way.
How can you say that when they didn't play with their full roster? You realize how much even 1 sub change the team chemistry and how they play? Especially when that sub can't even put similar individual performances. Its weakened individual talent + change in how the team plays. They even changed comps on Breeze for some reason. I would still give Fracture to DRX just because DRX were playing well against FPX's comp (suygetsu still way better anchor than SEIDER), but Breeze could have gone either way
No, but my statement still same.
Because not everyone can play good 24/7. If a player has a bad day it will be better if there's a sub for him.
And as a team adaptive play is one of requirement to be called good.
Now my question, why fpx get seider if he "t2" and doesn't play same agent?
If they can't secure a good sub, and the player can't adapt. Then that TEAM IS NOT GOOD.