https://i.imgur.com/uPLcFi7.png
S+: just a great logo all-round, no changes necessary
S: it's a great logo when you consider the branding, familiarity, and identity
S-: it's a decent logo but what makes it good is how unique it is
A: it's alright, it works well enough, it stands out and people can recognize it
B: old versions or other options or alterations are better but it has enough reputation to work anyway
C: it's pretty bad but at the same time recognizable and therefore fulfills the role of a logo
D: not a fan of the logo or branding or overall look
E: doesn't look like an esports logo (doesn't necessarily mean the logo is bad, just looks out of place, like more of a football club or a website or something)
F: please rebrand immediately (or at least make a new logo)
Individual tiers aren't in order.
You could make an argument for some of them to be placed elsewhere, but this is what I've got
A few notes:
SEN's logo doesn't really represent much. You look at it and you don't really know what it is. Also the fact that it's inscribed in a square makes it look a lot bulkier than other esports logos
As for NRG I only really put them there because people prefer the old logo for the most part. I'd actually put it in A maybe but I'm trying to keep this unbiased