0

Was LOCK IN that bad

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
H3ENnZ

Eh, it wasnt competitive and the format is shit and alot of teams had very easy matches. But its nice to see all the franchising teams at that point and see them play (Even tho it was kinda disappointing especially liquid and Clout9 and Sen)
But at least the all the winless teams got 5 grand :D :D :D that is definitely enough for their roster rebuild righttttttttt :D :D :D :D

#2
SunnyFromVLR
-1
Frags
+

LOCK IN was a gimmick tournament

#3
inlucid
12
Frags
+

best tournament imo i had so much fun watching it, also seeing pro's play on brazilian ranked/hearing brazilian songs was awesome

#6
kapteN
-15
Frags
+

you mean the worst crowd valorant has ever seen?

#16
hunkkz
13
Frags
+

i mean, at least they didn’t seem like NPCs. Brazilian crowd has personality, whether it’s good or bad, but there’s personality. The crowd at the Champs this year just seems like NPCs, like bots paid to be there lol

#26
kapteN
-7
Frags
+

"Whether it's good or bad, but there's personality"

This is such an ass take. It was absolutely terrible. Literal crowd-cheating, death threats, booing teams.

I'll take the NPCs over brazilian crowds any day

#30
Danfra
3
Frags
+

damm those braziilians are crazy, can u please link me a video or something to prove any type of violence against any player in Lock IN pls? since u talkd about death threats it must have happen something right?

#4
dort
-7
Frags
+

still way more competitive than whatever madr0d was

#11
nihso
0
Frags
+

still mad over that series. wow.

#12
Potatobrawler8
-5
Frags
+

still sad over lockin. wow.

#13
nihso
0
Frags
+

is this some sort of rage bait? it didnt work i laughed at it.

#24
Potatobrawler8
0
Frags
+

👍

#5
Yuh_aye
0
Frags
+

It wasn't competitive (at all, literally 0 competitive integrity) in the sense of being legit or mattering, but that wasn't the point, it was to showcase the teams in the new franchising system and generate interest, which it did very well. Alot of the matches were great too, I still think that Loud v NRG fracture is the single greatest map of all time.

#7
localkoolkid
2
Frags
+

May be an objectively bad tournament, but it is the most fun I have ever had watching pro Valorant.

#8
envyz
2
Frags
+

lock in format wise was bad but this meant every single game was important and high pressure

#9
Conceit
2
Frags
+

It was bad from a competition perspective, but it was really fun, which is what really matters; entertainment value

#10
RhythmD
6
Frags
+

Honestly was a very fun tournament to watch. Having it every 2 years or so just to get a refresher of teams on lan would be fun. Plus getting rid of an 8 team LAN is totally fine.

#14
cloudberry
2
Frags
+

I would be SO down for another LOCK//IN next year, that's an amazing idea

#15
nihso
0
Frags
+

with 48 teams? what the fuck would be the format? shit would take 2 months.

#17
cloudberry
1
Frags
+

You do know LOCK//IN is single elim, right? The way Riot would probably do it is give the 16 Champs teams from this year byes, and then just play the same LOCK//IN format with an extra round

#18
nihso
0
Frags
+

Giving the 16 teams byes wouldn't make real sense lets be real. Teams are gonna rebuild and change and also can just fall off ex FNC and EG. if its all single elim then it would be a fuck fest and fun ig.

#19
cloudberry
1
Frags
+

True, but how else are you meant to run a single elim tournament with 48 teams?

#20
nihso
1
Frags
+

I think a potential option that would be very long is 4 groups of 16 and each group is a swiss where 4 qual to playoffs making it 16 playoff bracket single elim

#21
cloudberry
0
Frags
+

That's a decent idea (albeit it would be 4 groups of 12, I think) but you're right, that would take too long, even if Champs is in October

#22
nihso
0
Frags
+

yeah its really hard to do a 48 team tourney with the amount of time since riot hate doing stuff after october

#29
Sk00d
1
Frags
+

4 groups of 12 wouldn't work in a swiss tho, you'd end up with 3 teams in 2-0/0-2 brackets leaving one of them without a matchup OR you'd have top have a weird number of team going thru (eg. 3 teams that went 2-0/6 teams that went 2-0 or 2-1) making it awkward to run the next stage of the event with 9 or 18 teams

the champs team bye idea is way better

#27
lordooohyeaa
0
Frags
+

no

#28
Sk00d
2
Frags
+

the non-competitive argument is so shit

if it was so noncompetitive then why did most top teams make it into the later rounds? we had DRX, Loud, NRG and Fnatic in the top 4 wich were probably the best 4 back then, only upsets we really had were PRX or maybe Liquid going out so early wich is a healthy amount of upsets

#31
Demon1_The_GOAT
0
Frags
+

It was definitely fun to watch. Very entertaining. I still believe LOUD should've won the last map if they didn't throw hard like that but then again the fans were too one sided so I'm glad FNC won. But that has to be one of the biggest chokes ever in the game.

#32
Danfra
0
Frags
+

that shit was like the 7-1 of valorant to me ngl

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment