Idk if this subject is banable here.
I just saw something on twitter saying he had intercourse with a minor, I've seen people trying to get him cancelled.
How old was she? Cause i think age of consent in korea is 16, and you can't enforce us laws everywhere, but if she's below 16... That's basically pedo.
And is there any proof to that? Or just people talking
1
Flashback drama
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
number1_cned_hater [#2]The problem isn't the minor part its the SA part
What's the SA part? Idk what happened exactly i saw like one post retweeted 10 times and it doesn't say much
azuchicastle [#3]Why can't you go through some of the threads before posting something like this?
I did, the threads were yesterday saying we don't know even if it's flashback
jalepnis [#9]its not the age thats the concern. its the fact that what he did is considered sexual assault bc he "internally ejaculated" (their words not mine) in her without consent
Idk if that's worthy of cancellation tho, he shouldn't have done it, but she consented to sex i guess, he messed up by doing that without his consent, but cancellation? Idk, unless she never consented to sex either
Jeffo [#8]I did, the threads were yesterday saying we don't know even if it's flashback
You clearly didn't because what you wrote doesn't correlate with what the threads mentioned about age and that you shouldn't point at people without actual proof.
azuchicastle [#11]You clearly didn't because what you wrote doesn't correlate with what the threads mentioned about age and that you shouldn't point at people without actual proof.
Bro answer or be quiet, you can ignore my thread for all i care.
I asked and you don't want to answer? move on.
Jeffo [#12]Bro answer or be quiet, you can ignore my thread for all i care.
I asked and you don't want to answer? move on.
Learn to read and use the internet, bro
Jeffo [#5]What's the SA part? Idk what happened exactly i saw like one post retweeted 10 times and it doesn't say much
I was wrong mb
azuchicastle [#13]Learn to read and use the internet, bro
I have a life sadly, unlike you. I just saw this and came for a short answer to my question, you can spend your day being an expert on using the internet
Jeffo [#15]I have a life sadly, unlike you. I just saw this and came for a short answer to my question, you can spend your day being an expert on using the internet
You have a life? Then how come you've got over 2k posts, lol
Jeffo [#10]Idk if that's worthy of cancellation tho, he shouldn't have done it, but she consented to sex i guess, he messed up by doing that without his consent, but cancellation? Idk, unless she never consented to sex either
potential victim claimed that the alleged perpetrator KNEW that the victim is against him ejaculating inside of her, so that's an insanely shitty act regardless
source - https://x.com/csqix66/status/1816042589226951100?t=bQgXhDxPnae7JPne3jHM_g&s=19
number1_cned_hater [#14]I was wrong mb
the thing is theres really no way to prove anything so we really shld stop speculating and just let them come out with somethin first
ButterflyEffect23 [#17]potential victim claimed that the alleged perpetrator KNEW that the victim is against him ejaculating inside of her, so that's an insanely shitty act regardless
source - https://x.com/csqix66/status/1816042589226951100?t=bQgXhDxPnae7JPne3jHM_g&s=19
So to be clear here the allegation here isn’t that the act of intercourse was non consensual, but it was the ejaculation that was non consensual?, if so that’s very difficult to prove, which is very unfortunate if the claim is true
azuchicastle [#16]You have a life? Then how come you've got over 2k posts, lol
2k in 800 days plus 💀 that's less than 3 a day
ButterflyEffect23 [#17]potential victim claimed that the alleged perpetrator KNEW that the victim is against him ejaculating inside of her, so that's an insanely shitty act regardless
source - https://x.com/csqix66/status/1816042589226951100?t=bQgXhDxPnae7JPne3jHM_g&s=19
I did say it's messed up but it's kind of reaching cancelling people for doing that
Aayan [#20]So to be clear here the allegation here isn’t that the act of intercourse was non consensual, but it was the ejaculation that was non consensual?, if so that’s very difficult to prove, which is very unfortunate if the claim is true
According to Korean law, this is not a criminal case. Some other countries punish it as SA, but Korea doesn't have such a law yet.
Jeffo [#21]2k in 800 days plus 💀 that's less than 3 a day
that kinda also proves his point again cause u have spent 800 days on this website 💀 also stop fragging your own posts goofy
alecksdesk [#4]shes 17 and hes 18
the age gap isnt why he is canceled, forcing him upon her (if allegations are true) is.
according to one of her own posts, she is 19 (https://x.com/csqix66/status/1793631682639323287). And while age of consent is 16 in Korea, if you are below 19, you are still considered a minor.
ssPennyss [#25]according to one of her own posts, she is 19 (https://x.com/csqix66/status/1793631682639323287). And while age of consent is 16 in Korea, if you are below 19, you are still considered a minor.
am korean, let me explain it for some of you get confused about age of consent and theres ton of misinformation out there, mainly because we use korean age (you are 1 year old on the day you are born and get a year older every January 1st.), so let me explain -
Sex with anyone under 13 is illegal no matter what your age
Sex with anyone under 16 is illegal unless you are under 19
You may have consensual sex with anyone over 16 if you are an adult (20 korean age, 19 normal age)
number1_cned_hater [#14]I was wrong mb
please don’t spread misinformation, that is not what the accusation is about.
alecksdesk [#4]shes 17 and hes 18
the age gap isnt why he is canceled, forcing him upon her (if allegations are true) is.
i said this to another user and i will say it again to you.He did not force himself on anyone, that is not what to accusation is. Dont spread misinformation if you haven’t read the post
glinki3436 [#24]that kinda also proves his point again cause u have spent 800 days on this website 💀 also stop fragging your own posts goofy
Yes i created this account in 2022 and go back every now on then to check what's going on
alecksdesk [#26]am korean, let me explain it for some of you get confused about age of consent and theres ton of misinformation out there, mainly because we use korean age (you are 1 year old on the day you are born and get a year older every January 1st.), so let me explain -
Sex with anyone under 13 is illegal no matter what your age
Sex with anyone under 16 is illegal unless you are under 19
You may have consensual sex with anyone over 16 if you are an adult (20 korean age, 19 normal age)
fucked up shit if you can have sex with 15 year old girl (DOB) while being 18
ssPennyss [#25]according to one of her own posts, she is 19 (https://x.com/csqix66/status/1793631682639323287). And while age of consent is 16 in Korea, if you are below 19, you are still considered a minor.
wait what. So did she lie in this post because she said she is a minor currently in high school?
merciless-pity8989-89 [#27]please don’t spread misinformation, that is not what the accusation is about.
What? Ok mb i read it wrong, what actually happened
zephyrara [#19]the thing is theres really no way to prove anything so we really shld stop speculating and just let them come out with somethin first
"alleged"
the problem here is non consensual insemination and rude behaviour after that and cheating allegations too
Also i think if we assume it to be Fb then his break is making sense but again he started playing and the girl is angry about it i guess which is fucked up for Fb
Just go for a police trial or smthing or if you don't want to make it big get a personal apology from Fb
why make public stunt before champions
Fb is fucked up to meet girls from instagram and inseminate them without consensus
Jeffo [#29]Yes i created this account in 2022 and go back every now on then to check what's going on
"go back every now and then to check what's going on" = minimum 3 posts a day for over 2 years💀💀💀
Samsat78 [#37]Did bruh just got sinatraa case?
Yes it seems to be the similar case, judging by all other contexts
Yall should stop directly mentioning names. Nothing is confirmed yet. DRX officially said they would carry out thorough investigations, so we wait. Posts like this pointing out specific players is nothing more than fuelling for more chaos in the community and giving people the chance to make hasty presumptions on their own, creating a cascade of even more chaos and confusion/drama
Skaydi [#39]Yall should stop directly mentioning names. Nothing is confirmed yet. DRX officially said they would carry out thorough investigations, so we wait. Posts like this pointing out specific players is nothing more than fuelling for more chaos in the community and giving people the chance to make hasty presumptions on their own, creating a cascade of even more chaos and confusion/drama
the main problem is people like this on twitter already https://x.com/auntymarrie think said person is guilty
zhongZHI [#40]the main problem is people like this on twitter already https://x.com/auntymarrie think said person is guilty
The_DONG [#41]
like imagine he's innocent and this is all bs. you've permanently ruined his image cuz no one is hiring a suspected rapist.
zhongZHI [#43]like imagine he's innocent and this is all bs. you've permanently ruined his image cuz no one is hiring a suspected rapist.
why they not resolve in private why not talk to trusted adult before bringing up on internet causing large drama
zhongZHI [#43]like imagine he's innocent and this is all bs. you've permanently ruined his image cuz no one is hiring a suspected rapist.
Yeah, it's sad that many people are immediately against the accused even though nothing is fully confirmed. Like, why can't people be unbiased and just wait for both sides or an official statement? It's always guilty till proven innocent but not the other way around.
zhongZHI [#40]the main problem is people like this on twitter already https://x.com/auntymarrie think said person is guilty
PhD in PaperRexology is cringe af
her posts are hella cringe too ngl
nobody___100 [#46]PhD in PaperRexology is cringe af
her posts are hella cringe too ngl
It's crazy that in her post, she's emphasizing "ALLEGED" yet treating them like they did it.
Jeffo [#10]Idk if that's worthy of cancellation tho, he shouldn't have done it, but she consented to sex i guess, he messed up by doing that without his consent, but cancellation? Idk, unless she never consented to sex either
i would say it does count as SA. However it is poor decision making from both parties involved. but it can be considered as SA if she made it very clear she doesnt want it to happen. Its similar to like if your gf starts pegging you randomly during sex. I would complain too if that happened
Discord