g2-0 sen
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.02 1.09 0.89 | 267 277 250 | 17 11 6 | / 17 10 7 / | 2 2 0 | 0 +1 -1 | 63% 67% 57% | 171 174 166 | 22% 21% 24% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.77 0.87 0.59 | 152 141 170 | 10 7 3 | / 15 8 7 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -1 -4 | 63% 67% 57% | 106 93 128 | 22% 20% 25% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.75 0.90 0.51 | 230 248 199 | 13 9 4 | / 17 10 7 / | 6 4 2 | -4 -1 -3 | 68% 83% 43% | 139 152 116 | 22% 24% 17% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.54 0.57 0.49 | 118 126 107 | 7 5 2 | / 17 10 7 / | 5 3 2 | -10 -5 -5 | 58% 67% 43% | 74 74 75 | 7% 8% 7% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.46 0.78 0.02 | 104 135 53 | 5 5 0 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 6 1 | -10 -3 -7 | 47% 58% 29% | 79 94 53 | 31% 57% 0% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.51 2.51 0.93 | 229 388 137 | 16 11 5 | / 9 2 7 / | 12 8 4 | +7 +9 -2 | 89% 100% 83% | 131 223 78 | 32% 43% 19% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.41 1.47 1.37 | 234 255 223 | 17 7 10 | / 10 4 6 / | 12 3 9 | +7 +3 +4 | 84% 86% 83% | 127 139 121 | 15% 24% 8% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.31 1.26 1.33 | 259 227 279 | 19 6 13 | / 12 3 9 / | 3 1 2 | +7 +3 +4 | 74% 71% 75% | 178 138 201 | 27% 17% 35% | 4 0 4 | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.29 0.95 1.50 | 228 235 225 | 15 6 9 | / 10 5 5 / | 9 3 6 | +5 +1 +4 | 84% 86% 83% | 153 123 170 | 28% 24% 31% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.15 1.67 0.85 | 181 180 182 | 14 5 9 | / 11 1 10 / | 9 4 5 | +3 +4 -1 | 84% 100% 75% | 120 131 113 | 22% 19% 23% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.97 1.24 1.08 | 177 155 213 | 29 15 14 | / 27 16 11 / | 8 3 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 71% 67% 76% | 110 103 122 | 24% 33% 17% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.03 0.86 0.96 | 177 214 136 | 25 18 7 | / 31 19 12 / | 13 5 8 | -6 -1 -5 | 71% 75% 65% | 116 131 93 | 23% 29% 16% | 3 2 1 | 5 3 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.74 0.74 0.74 | 218 214 214 | 29 17 12 | / 36 21 15 / | 5 3 2 | -7 -4 -3 | 63% 58% 71% | 140 138 141 | 21% 21% 20% | 7 4 3 | 8 6 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.70 0.73 0.70 | 142 154 132 | 17 11 6 | / 30 18 12 / | 16 12 4 | -13 -7 -6 | 68% 75% 59% | 107 111 101 | 28% 47% 14% | 1 0 1 | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.65 0.65 0.65 | 189 169 211 | 25 13 12 | / 34 19 15 / | 10 6 4 | -9 -6 -3 | 68% 71% 65% | 113 110 118 | 22% 22% 22% | 2 1 1 | 6 4 2 | -4 -3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.92 1.66 1.35 | 261 217 294 | 41 12 29 | / 26 11 15 / | 5 2 3 | +15 +1 +14 | 73% 65% 79% | 172 132 201 | 28% 27% 29% | 7 2 5 | 4 2 2 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.55 1.12 1.30 | 195 205 190 | 29 13 16 | / 23 7 16 / | 23 9 14 | +6 +6 0 | 80% 82% 79% | 132 140 126 | 20% 21% 19% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.68 1.04 1.30 | 226 265 198 | 32 18 14 | / 24 8 16 / | 21 9 12 | +8 +10 -2 | 83% 88% 79% | 136 155 122 | 27% 31% 24% | 7 2 5 | 3 1 2 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.63 1.33 1.04 | 212 164 245 | 29 8 21 | / 28 13 15 / | 15 6 9 | +1 -5 +6 | 78% 71% 83% | 142 108 166 | 21% 20% 22% | 4 2 2 | 1 1 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.05 0.90 0.96 | 175 208 144 | 27 14 13 | / 24 12 12 / | 16 4 12 | +3 +2 +1 | 76% 76% 75% | 94 113 80 | 18% 35% 5% | 4 2 2 | 5 2 3 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 1.07 1.70 | 202 169 242 | 19 8 11 | / 12 8 4 / | 4 2 2 | +7 0 +7 | 77% 67% 90% | 115 112 117 | 26% 50% 12% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.33 1.50 1.12 | 236 303 156 | 18 13 5 | / 14 9 5 / | 8 2 6 | +4 +4 0 | 82% 83% 80% | 151 189 106 | 30% 38% 21% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.90 0.63 1.23 | 180 174 188 | 12 6 6 | / 15 10 5 / | 9 6 3 | -3 -4 +1 | 86% 92% 80% | 131 127 134 | 26% 42% 18% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.56 0.41 0.74 | 148 90 219 | 12 4 8 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 2 2 | -5 -5 0 | 68% 58% 80% | 91 67 119 | 22% 18% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.50 0.39 0.63 | 168 152 189 | 12 6 6 | / 19 11 8 / | 3 1 2 | -7 -5 -2 | 64% 50% 80% | 113 103 124 | 19% 22% 17% | 6 3 3 | 6 4 2 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.47 1.40 | 209 224 198 | 15 8 7 | / 12 6 6 / | 14 5 9 | +3 +2 +1 | 77% 70% 83% | 143 147 140 | 18% 22% 16% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.40 0.68 1.99 | 263 210 308 | 22 6 16 | / 14 8 6 / | 2 1 1 | +8 -2 +10 | 73% 60% 83% | 168 129 200 | 29% 37% 24% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.12 1.09 1.14 | 222 179 258 | 16 7 9 | / 15 6 9 / | 9 1 8 | +1 +1 0 | 77% 80% 75% | 140 108 166 | 23% 17% 27% | 4 1 3 | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.82 0.41 1.16 | 196 114 265 | 14 2 12 | / 18 8 10 / | 6 3 3 | -4 -6 +2 | 73% 60% 83% | 133 98 162 | 18% 17% 18% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.58 0.75 0.43 | 115 175 66 | 10 7 3 | / 14 8 6 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 68% 70% 67% | 64 96 39 | 23% 50% 0% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
Bluez [#4]Sen 2-1 G2
G2 fluked it to make master shanghai
We beat PRX and the runner-up twice before losing to them?
N_avY_ [#31]Nah sen 2-0, they havent lost a map in stage 2, its an ez win
pure delusion its sen 2-1
number_1_Ego_fan [#24]HYDROGEN BOMB VS HYDROGEN BOMB
G2 2-1 SEN
Map 1: 13-10 G2
Map 2: 13-11 SEN (icy offline during this map)
Map 3: 13-9 G2if icy is offline in this series, then SEN win 2-1
honestly entirely reliant on icy performance
tungsten_cube [#42]honestly entirely reliant on icy performance
nah bruh
valyn can keep up the calls too bro
_Mada_ [#60]SEN 2-1 G2
Cinema Johnqt 🙇
johnqt revenge vs valyn (tbh it’s a good thing he lost otherwise sen would’ve been a disaster)
K4ziuHa [#37]pure delusion its sen 2-1
bro doesnt know what delusion means lmao how is it 'delusion' when they havent dropped a map? at least use the word right and then predict
SquareMars [#16]We beat PRX and the runner-up twice before losing to them?
That is true but Sen has also beat them and gen.g but yeah I disagree with the fluke they looked really good at shanghai
chimmyhms [#66]bro doesnt know what delusion means lmao how is it 'delusion' when they havent dropped a map? at least use the word right and then predict
🥶🥶🥶🤒🤒🤒🤕🤕🤕😱😱😱
SolarX [#81]G2 win 2-1, dont be delusional now guys. Just because SEN is #1 in NA in the beta rankings tab doesn't mean they are the best in the americas, technically G2 is the best in americas right now and it shows.
But that ranks means nothing and no One gives a shit about it, Sen/G2 are top 3 teams with Lev at this point, They are probably going champions
SolarX [#81]G2 win 2-1, dont be delusional now guys. Just because SEN is #1 in NA in the beta rankings tab doesn't mean they are the best in the americas, technically G2 is the best in americas right now and it shows.
the team that got 3-0'ed by 100mid, is just not the best in NA. lets not be delusional. (The team that almost choked to kru and c9.)
aaa111aaa111 [#83]the team that got 3-0'ed by 100mid, is just not the best in NA. lets not be delusional. (The team that almost choked to kru and c9.)
bro is looking at the previous split
you do realize that G2 is third in the world due to Shanghai, right? not to mention they've won all of their games since then.
SolarX [#81]G2 win 2-1, dont be delusional now guys. Just because SEN is #1 in NA in the beta rankings tab doesn't mean they are the best in the americas, technically G2 is the best in americas right now and it shows.
sen are the best americas team as they won masters
SolarX [#84]bro is looking at the previous split
you do realize that G2 is third in the world due to Shanghai, right? not to mention they've won all of their games since then.
sen are masters winner and have also won all of their games in split 2.sen are better and will win against g2 2-0
number_1_Ego_fan [#24]HYDROGEN BOMB VS HYDROGEN BOMB
G2 2-1 SEN
Map 1: 13-10 G2
Map 2: 13-11 SEN (icy offline during this map)
Map 3: 13-9 G2if icy is offline in this series, then SEN win 2-1
icy is horrible like 9/10 times
chimmyhms [#66]bro doesnt know what delusion means lmao how is it 'delusion' when they havent dropped a map? at least use the word right and then predict
How come that you're a Canadian whose native language is english, but sucks at comprehending a simple statement. What he meant was 2-0 is a delusion and instead it's a 2-1 sen. Maybe listen or attend to class instead of playing/watching valorant all day
ManJu- [#106]How come that you're a Canadian whose native language is english, but sucks at comprehending a simple statement. What he meant was 2-0 is a delusion and instead it's a 2-1 sen. Maybe listen or attend to class instead of playing/watching valorant all day
Cook that fraud
HeIsTet [#132]Zekken plays like shit = lose. Good on G2 to shutdown Zekken but my god if Zekken was playing well I don't think we would of lost. All good playoffs we win lower bracket
all good we’ll get a banger rematch
Tenz2322 [#87]sen are the best americas team as they won masters
THIS is THE dumbest take ive seen. TIME PASSES SONNY. That trophy was 4 and a half months ago, they have CLEALY fallen off and the G2 2-0 SEN result shows that clearly
catNmouse [#134]all good we’ll get a banger rematch
I hope so, honestly just want any Americas team to win champs and hopefully SEN qual for champs too. Good luck to G2
lLoveMen [#147]This is a reality check for SEN fans. They thought they were the best team itw after beating 3 mid teams 2-0. G2 and LEV are clearly better
Questions - Umm, when have PRX won a masters? How many master have Sentinels won? So who is better? Who is the fool?
Answers - Never. 2. Sentinels. You.
Ur welcome
LouBag [#149]Imagine losing to a t2 team 😂
You're team just lost to mibr. I don't wanna hear you talking.
CLPQ [#152]Questions - Umm, when have PRX won a masters? How many master have Sentinels won? So who is better? Who is the fool?
Answers - Never. 2. Sentinels. You.
Ur welcome
Leave the past behind and focus on the present. PRX is already in champs while there's a big chance SEN doesnt qualify again
CLPQ [#152]Questions - Umm, when have PRX won a masters? How many master have Sentinels won? So who is better? Who is the fool?
Answers - Never. 2. Sentinels. You.
Ur welcome
Questions - Umm, who cares?
CLPQ [#152]Questions - Umm, when have PRX won a masters? How many master have Sentinels won? So who is better? Who is the fool?
Answers - Never. 2. Sentinels. You.
Ur welcome
you sound like an astralis fan
CLPQ [#152]Questions - Umm, when have PRX won a masters? How many master have Sentinels won? So who is better? Who is the fool?
Answers - Never. 2. Sentinels. You.
Ur welcome
the only thing you can brag about is the past masters that Sen won, you're directing the convo away from present day cause there's nothing to show, pure copium.
LouBag [#149]Imagine losing to a t2 team 😂
Bro forgot to remove flair before mock other teams. Ur team lose to worst franchise team in the world ffs.
Potter masterclass my ass.
CLPQ [#152]Questions - Umm, when have PRX won a masters? How many master have Sentinels won? So who is better? Who is the fool?
Answers - Never. 2. Sentinels. You.
Ur welcome
Yeah, why you so mad? Eventually PRX fans will have to deal with the fact GENG is a better team, the only pacific team to win any Masters. But this Sentinels ain’t winning shit this year if they don’t improve.
tur0n [#168]man sentinels are trolling on this comp idk why they didn't go for double controller as usual
this comp work against nrg and they had fade breach comp they just went w deadlock
bronzil_enjoyer [#180]owned the whole vlr keke
ppl always underrating g2 no matter how much they win sadly
benjy [#181]ppl always underrating g2 no matter how much they win sadly
even if they win a masters they will still doubt g2