PRX 2-1
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 1.04 1.31 | 240 236 243 | 19 7 12 | / 13 6 7 / | 3 2 1 | +6 +1 +5 | 85% 100% 75% | 150 157 145 | 26% 47% 14% | 5 2 3 | 2 1 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.16 1.07 1.22 | 202 198 206 | 15 6 9 | / 14 6 8 / | 10 3 7 | +1 0 +1 | 80% 75% 83% | 148 145 150 | 43% 45% 42% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.10 1.17 1.06 | 190 197 186 | 14 6 8 | / 13 5 8 / | 11 3 8 | +1 +1 0 | 65% 50% 75% | 125 133 120 | 32% 36% 30% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.01 1.58 0.64 | 275 313 251 | 18 9 9 | / 18 6 12 / | 11 4 7 | 0 +3 -3 | 85% 88% 83% | 167 193 149 | 11% 13% 9% | 7 3 4 | 4 1 3 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.83 0.25 1.21 | 114 13 183 | 9 0 9 | / 13 5 8 / | 12 4 8 | -4 -5 +1 | 70% 63% 75% | 74 6 120 | 21% 0% 24% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.31 1.63 0.84 | 283 348 187 | 20 15 5 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 3 3 | +4 +6 -2 | 80% 92% 63% | 186 236 111 | 50% 52% 45% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.07 0.70 1.63 | 171 86 301 | 12 3 9 | / 12 8 4 / | 16 10 6 | 0 -5 +5 | 80% 75% 88% | 114 58 198 | 38% 30% 42% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.99 1.13 0.77 | 232 265 184 | 15 11 4 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 2 3 | -1 +1 -2 | 70% 67% 75% | 146 143 152 | 31% 37% 21% | 4 4 0 | 6 4 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.93 0.65 1.35 | 158 144 179 | 12 6 6 | / 14 10 4 / | 4 2 2 | -2 -4 +2 | 75% 67% 88% | 110 104 117 | 48% 33% 83% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.65 0.75 0.50 | 177 193 154 | 12 8 4 | / 17 10 7 / | 3 1 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 55% 58% 50% | 105 112 95 | 10% 25% 0% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 1.27 1.33 | 233 230 239 | 53 26 27 | / 41 20 21 / | 23 13 10 | +12 +6 +6 | 79% 81% 77% | 157 157 158 | 32% 29% 36% | 7 2 5 | 2 1 1 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
1.13 1.06 1.10 | 206 218 194 | 50 25 25 | / 42 22 20 / | 13 7 6 | +8 +3 +5 | 75% 75% 74% | 132 147 116 | 30% 34% 25% | 11 6 5 | 6 4 2 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.82 1.08 0.95 | 250 197 299 | 52 21 31 | / 57 27 30 / | 30 12 18 | -5 -6 +1 | 81% 75% 87% | 163 138 188 | 17% 19% 15% | 15 5 10 | 7 4 3 | +8 +1 +7 | |
|
0.80 0.88 0.84 | 156 144 168 | 35 18 17 | / 42 21 21 / | 28 12 16 | -7 -3 -4 | 67% 63% 71% | 105 93 116 | 27% 34% 21% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.43 1.13 0.77 | 154 100 217 | 36 11 25 | / 47 24 23 / | 23 7 16 | -11 -13 +2 | 71% 63% 81% | 98 62 135 | 31% 31% 31% | 4 2 2 | 6 5 1 | -2 -3 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 1.18 1.25 | 255 293 214 | 57 32 25 | / 45 24 21 / | 17 10 7 | +12 +8 +4 | 81% 87% 75% | 168 202 134 | 39% 40% 39% | 5 0 5 | 5 2 3 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.68 1.56 1.13 | 222 181 268 | 50 19 31 | / 42 27 15 / | 16 7 9 | +8 -8 +16 | 81% 71% 91% | 153 124 182 | 33% 35% 32% | 8 2 6 | 10 9 1 | -2 -7 +5 | |
|
1.17 0.82 0.99 | 206 238 176 | 45 28 17 | / 50 26 24 / | 29 11 18 | -5 +2 -7 | 76% 71% 81% | 131 137 125 | 33% 33% 33% | 5 4 1 | 11 5 6 | -6 -1 -5 | |
|
0.93 0.85 0.89 | 186 183 189 | 41 22 19 | / 45 23 22 / | 12 5 7 | -4 -1 -3 | 70% 68% 72% | 124 118 131 | 27% 26% 28% | 4 2 2 | 8 4 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.70 1.00 0.85 | 164 144 182 | 36 14 22 | / 44 25 19 / | 28 16 12 | -8 -11 +3 | 78% 74% 81% | 106 100 113 | 30% 27% 33% | 2 0 2 | 5 3 2 | -3 -3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 1.30 1.10 | 241 231 259 | 16 9 7 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 4 2 | +2 +1 +1 | 80% 75% 88% | 158 157 160 | 15% 13% 18% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.08 1.35 0.68 | 193 250 109 | 15 11 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 3 1 | 0 +2 -2 | 60% 58% 63% | 129 167 73 | 38% 36% 43% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.72 1.41 | 284 217 386 | 19 9 10 | / 22 13 9 / | 12 5 7 | -3 -4 +1 | 75% 67% 88% | 191 163 234 | 21% 28% 16% | 4 1 3 | 2 2 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.58 0.47 0.73 | 143 114 188 | 10 5 5 | / 15 9 6 / | 9 6 3 | -5 -4 -1 | 65% 75% 50% | 100 74 140 | 27% 36% 21% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.54 0.24 1.00 | 132 74 220 | 10 3 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 1 2 | -6 -7 +1 | 60% 50% 75% | 84 55 127 | 26% 21% 29% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.52 1.45 1.57 | 287 289 287 | 21 8 13 | / 13 6 7 / | 6 4 2 | +8 +2 +6 | 95% 100% 92% | 191 205 181 | 37% 25% 48% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.10 1.39 0.92 | 208 268 169 | 15 9 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 5 1 4 | +2 +3 -1 | 80% 75% 83% | 150 186 127 | 33% 23% 45% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.10 0.36 1.59 | 240 139 308 | 17 3 14 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 4 2 | +3 -5 +8 | 90% 88% 92% | 160 100 200 | 26% 36% 23% | 4 1 3 | 4 3 1 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.08 1.22 0.98 | 196 199 195 | 15 7 8 | / 15 6 9 / | 8 2 6 | 0 +1 -1 | 75% 50% 92% | 138 129 144 | 39% 42% 38% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.87 0.91 | 186 210 172 | 14 6 8 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 2 3 | -1 -1 0 | 70% 75% 67% | 107 123 96 | 21% 24% 19% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.57 1.70 1.43 | 255 251 261 | 22 11 11 | / 13 6 7 / | 7 6 1 | +9 +5 +4 | 78% 92% 64% | 164 164 165 | 42% 40% 44% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.02 0.96 1.08 | 186 173 202 | 16 7 9 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 2 4 | +2 0 +2 | 78% 75% 82% | 119 122 117 | 28% 23% 35% | 4 3 1 | 2 1 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.92 0.72 1.12 | 216 185 251 | 17 8 9 | / 18 9 9 / | 8 2 6 | -1 -1 0 | 83% 75% 91% | 131 108 157 | 44% 44% 44% | 3 1 2 | 4 4 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.85 0.43 1.32 | 190 100 289 | 15 3 12 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 3 4 | -2 -5 +3 | 83% 75% 91% | 134 77 196 | 22% 17% 25% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.84 0.89 0.78 | 135 139 132 | 11 7 4 | / 14 7 7 / | 8 3 5 | -3 0 -3 | 70% 58% 82% | 90 87 95 | 21% 31% 14% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 0.95 1.67 | 269 252 285 | 21 10 11 | / 14 9 5 / | 6 1 5 | +7 +1 +6 | 78% 64% 92% | 186 163 207 | 33% 35% 31% | 4 1 3 | 5 5 0 | -1 -4 +3 | |
|
0.96 0.89 1.03 | 195 236 159 | 16 9 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 5 3 2 | 0 0 0 | 70% 73% 67% | 132 163 103 | 33% 42% 23% | 2 0 2 | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.92 1.17 0.70 | 191 236 151 | 15 10 5 | / 19 10 9 / | 16 7 9 | -4 0 -4 | 83% 91% 75% | 111 138 88 | 30% 24% 42% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.92 0.80 1.02 | 174 111 233 | 14 5 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | 74% 73% 75% | 119 75 159 | 48% 36% 56% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.62 0.57 0.66 | 135 159 113 | 10 5 5 | / 17 10 7 / | 7 4 3 | -7 -5 -2 | 83% 73% 92% | 99 128 72 | 33% 27% 45% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
_Nonsense [#26]PRX 2-0
Not even worth discussing, i just cannot see the image RRQ beating PRX. Maybe PRX lost a map but not the series
Raze isn't that strong and Prx can have unlucky experiment, and rrq can take the other map
_Nonsense [#26]PRX 2-0
Not even worth discussing, i just cannot see the image RRQ beating PRX. Maybe PRX lost a map but not the series
П
yssmiac [#39]PRX 2 - 0 RRQ. No one can beat this team anymore. They are back with more discipline. Just let PRX qualify for champions instantly.
They says this every time lol cmon
_Nonsense [#26]PRX 2-0
Not even worth discussing, i just cannot see the image RRQ beating PRX. Maybe PRX lost a map but not the series
nickname checks out
grisx23 [#40]They says this every time lol cmon
i mean its kinda right but not really at the same time if they keep playing in this form sure but 90% they crumble at internationals, thats the reason for almost all their loses
IadcbI [#28]Raze isn't that strong and Prx can have unlucky experiment, and rrq can take the other map
they wont experiment as if they lose they might be lose out on top 2
bilim [#72]I've always loved monyey. when he joined prx, I was happy because monyey joined one of my favorite teams. then he joined RRQ, I loved RRQ even more because there was monyey. My Monyey BOMB 40. WMEMORE BOMB 40. XFERRO BOMB 40. JEMKIN BOMB 30. ESTRELLA IGL BOMB 2
wokwokwok goblok
PoonRaccoon [#68]RRQ fans are delusional, PRX is gonna shit on RRQ
RRQ is a good team no doubt but they're still a new team.On the other hand this iteration of PRX has been together for quite a some time and have far more experience than RRQ.
PRX 2-0 RRQ
WE ARE SO BACK
noudlez [#63]jinggg gets back to back aces and then stands up with his ass out and pulls boaster haven vs fpx and starts twerking and shit please help the voices arew getighn lwosuders
Sanest NRG fan:
AdhesiveLizard [#83]RRQ 2-0
If im wrong i will tell u where i live and u guys can kick my balls as hard as u can (jk)
Easy 2-0 for RRQ
AdhesiveLizard [#83]RRQ 2-0
If im wrong i will tell u where i live and u guys can kick my balls as hard as u can (jk)
lol loserss
PoonRaccoon [#68]RRQ fans are delusional, PRX is gonna shit on RRQ
RRQ is a good team no doubt but they're still a new team.On the other hand this iteration of PRX has been together for quite a some time and have far more experience than RRQ.
PRX 2-0 RRQ
cap
both teams looks convinving on sunset (3rd map) and if we only count every sunset played by both teams starting from split 1 of pacific league :
PRX 89% WR - 9 games
RRQ 100% WR - 2 games
but RRQ only played sunset twice while PRX 89% WR over 9 games seems far more solid on average.
funfact : lotus is RRQ worst map with only 25% WR from 4 games.
7ckingsad [#102]both teams looks convinving on sunset (3rd map) and if we only count every sunset played by both teams starting from split 1 of pacific league :
PRX 89% WR - 9 games
RRQ 100% WR - 2 gamesbut RRQ only played sunset twice while PRX 89% WR over 9 games seems far more solid on average.
funfact : lotus is RRQ worst map with only 25% WR from 4 games.
sunset is PRX best imo
FDWC- [#110]need rrq to lose this series please
they would play against gen.g if they won this series
just run it down
really? any info?
Gatzk [#116]really? any info?
pretty sure 3rd seed will be playing against 5th seed and 4th seed playing against 6th seed
dude as an prx fan it hurts to watch their gameplay i have to agree jinggg and something are one of the most overrated players i have ever seen both so inconsistent i think im gonna get hate for this but i have to admit prx are overrated i doubt they will even win a match on champs their era is over
irishsamingg [#122]dude as an prx fan it hurts to watch their gameplay i have to agree jinggg and something are one of the most overrated players i have ever seen both so inconsistent i think im gonna get hate for this but i have to admit prx are overrated i doubt they will even win a match on champs their era is over
INS, SG something clears everyone
FDWC- [#119]pretty sure 3rd seed will be playing against 5th seed and 4th seed playing against 6th seed
no, riot would not let that happen, they'll change the seeding rules.
irishsamingg [#122]dude as an prx fan it hurts to watch their gameplay i have to agree jinggg and something are one of the most overrated players i have ever seen both so inconsistent i think im gonna get hate for this but i have to admit prx are overrated i doubt they will even win a match on champs their era is over
Nice jinx
FDWC- [#110]need rrq to lose this series please
they would play against gen.g if they won this series
just run it down
200IQ play by Ewok
People think RRQ was throwing but in fact that was a strategy to evade single elim against Gen.G
Cu55Ku55_______ [#78]Sanest NRG fan:
i mean after their recent performances, can you blame me for being insane?