7ckingsad
Flag: Afghanistan
Registered: June 24, 2024
Last post: July 12, 2024 at 3:30 AM
Posts: 13

bilibili

posted 5 months ago

Who hears dollar from a turkish person whose currenly in turkey and thinks of a Singaporean dollar lol. Come on bro.

posted 5 months ago

bro we all knew lmao

posted 5 months ago

yes only second to split which has 100% WR from 3 games.

posted 5 months ago

both teams looks convinving on sunset (3rd map) and if we only count every sunset played by both teams starting from split 1 of pacific league :
PRX 89% WR - 9 games
RRQ 100% WR - 2 games

but RRQ only played sunset twice while PRX 89% WR over 9 games seems far more solid on average.

funfact : lotus is RRQ worst map with only 25% WR from 4 games.

posted 5 months ago

INDIAN TALKING KKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

posted 5 months ago

PACIFIC VERSION
S : PRX, GENG
A : TS, RRQ
B : TLN, DRX
C : T1
D : GE, ZETA
E : BLD, DFM

posted 5 months ago

4 out of 6 teams that qualified for the Pacific League playoffs are from the SEA region and 3 out of the top 4 finishing teams from the last Pacific Ascension League are also from SEA. And Riot has decided to merge the SEA Challenger League into one? This indirectly places SEA teams at the same level as teams from OCE and SA. No offense to my peeps from OCE and SA but lets be realistic.

Whoever is in charge of this decision must be dumb and should be fired. Well it’s probably another Leo Faria decision, this guy never learns. If viewership is indeed an issue, you can’t sacrifice competitive integrity for viewer numbers. It’s really unfair to the players and teams currently competing in T2-T3.

And its kinda crazy with how everyone so chill about this changes lmao.

EDIT :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS3D8bgYhf4 some GTA V stunt clip for yall with goldfish attention span

posted 5 months ago

tbh only big on viewership but still lacking of regeneration

posted 5 months ago

edating always been a part of gaming culture but people kinda take it too far nowadays...

posted 5 months ago

agree if atleast a few SA players can prove their worth on ascension, i think adding one more seat for SA player doesnt sound so bad.

posted 5 months ago

From an org viewpoint, suppose they're going for a 5-Indian roster and end up winless for the entire split (lets be realistic), it's a lose-lose situation. Sure, they'll have the 5-Indian roster but no one will watch a team that keeps losing and there's no way Riot will let it slide (for being winless).

That's why I think Rushi's approach is probably the best for now. But rather than just one Indian player, how about adding one more from SA VCL? and get rid of sp0n while make a roster around russ and blazek1ng.

so, the whole roster would look like this :

  • russ
  • blazek1ng
  • good igl
  • indian
  • indian
posted 5 months ago

isnt navi lose againts FUT?

posted 5 months ago