Sen vs 100T
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
5
7
-2
|
5
5
+0
|
5
3
+2
|
5
6
-1
|
4
7
-3
|
zombs
SEN
|
4
8
-4
|
4
6
-2
|
4
7
-3
|
1
7
-6
|
1
3
-2
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
6
-3
|
3
5
-2
|
5
3
+2
|
4
8
-4
|
4
8
-4
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
6
-4
|
4
3
+1
|
5
6
-1
|
1
4
-3
|
6
9
-3
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
5
-1
|
5
8
-3
|
3
5
-2
|
5
10
-5
|
4
3
+1
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
0
2
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
1
2
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
1
1
+0
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
1
1
+0
|
|
2
0
+2
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
2
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
2
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
1
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
3
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
36
|
3
|
1
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
2
|
0
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
0
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
68
|
8
|
2
|
Will
BBG
|
|
5
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
2
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
6
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
2
|
4
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
3
5
-2
|
4
3
+1
|
4
1
+3
|
2
3
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
zombs
SEN
|
4
4
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
2
4
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
1
1
+0
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
3
-2
|
1
2
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
2
5
-3
|
dapr
SEN
|
0
2
-2
|
1
2
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
3
4
-1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
2
4
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
4
5
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
3
Round 3
Poach
Critical
Round 7
Poach
Critical
Round 15
Will
Critical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
1
Round 12
Will
rarkar
|
1
Round 3
rarkar
Will
bjor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
1
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
Round 4
Will
bjor
Round 12
Poach
Critical
Round 13
Poach
rarkar
|
1
Round 8
Will
rarkar
Poach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
1
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
Round 5
Poach
bjor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
1
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
1
Round 17
bjor
Will
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
0
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
3
Round 1
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 5
dapr
ShahZaM
Round 16
SicK
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
1
|
0
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
3
Round 8
dapr
zombs
Round 13
dapr
TenZ
Round 16
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
3
Round 2
SicK
ShahZaM
Round 13
SicK
zombs
Round 17
dapr
zombs
|
1
Round 4
zombs
ShahZaM
dapr
|
|
|
|
1
Round 4
dapr
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
55
|
7
|
0
|
Will
BBG
|
|
1
Round 14
dapr
SicK
|
2
Round 1
dapr
zombs
SicK
Round 10
SicK
dapr
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
2
Round 8
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 14
TenZ
zombs
|
1
Round 18
SicK
ShahZaM
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
1
|
2
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
2
5
-3
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
4
-4
|
3
4
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
1
4
-3
|
0
2
-2
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
3
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
3
6
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
4
-2
|
3
1
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
0
3
-3
|
3
5
-2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
2
3
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
1
5
-4
|
2
1
+1
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
0
2
-2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
2
-1
|
|
Poach
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Critical
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
Round 5
rarkar
bjor
Round 15
Critical
rarkar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
2
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
4
Round 6
Critical
Will
Round 8
Will
rarkar
Round 10
rarkar
Critical
Round 16
rarkar
Poach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
1
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
2
Round 1
Critical
Poach
Will
Round 4
Critical
Poach
rarkar
|
|
|
1
Round 4
rarkar
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
0
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
Round 3
bjor
rarkar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
2
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
4
Round 1
bjor
rarkar
Round 4
Will
bjor
Round 16
Will
bjor
Round 18
Poach
rarkar
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 16
bjor
Will
|
|
|
|
30
|
3
|
1
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
3
Round 8
zombs
SicK
Round 13
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 18
TenZ
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
1
|
0
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
4
Round 2
zombs
SicK
Round 3
TenZ
SicK
Round 4
zombs
dapr
Round 6
ShahZaM
TenZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
1
|
0
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
2
Round 6
dapr
SicK
Round 15
TenZ
SicK
|
1
Round 11
zombs
SicK
ShahZaM
|
1
Round 10
dapr
TenZ
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
1
Round 3
zombs
|
|
|
1
Round 10
dapr
TenZ
zombs
ShahZaM
|
|
80
|
1
|
2
|
Will
BBG
|
|
4
Round 12
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 13
dapr
SicK
Round 14
ShahZaM
dapr
Round 18
ShahZaM
dapr
|
1
Round 15
ShahZaM
zombs
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
2
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
4
Round 4
TenZ
SicK
Round 5
zombs
SicK
Round 8
dapr
ShahZaM
Round 14
TenZ
zombs
|
2
Round 9
ShahZaM
SicK
TenZ
Round 17
dapr
SicK
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
1
|
2
|
https://gyazo.com/06070a65c45ac307e24140c65f7b2d7f
11 clowns downvoted my comment. Hope they swallow their words now, idiots.
TenZ is easily a top 2 player in the world with Mwzera. Do you want to give a reason or argument for why he isn't? Because he has insane stats to back him up, and even after returning from a break that lasted multiple months, he dominated at Masters with Sen... I don't even watch twitch(except to watch Valorant tournaments) and I've never watched any of TenZ's YT vids and Sen is one of my least favorite teams so I'm not just some fanboy either. All I want is a good argument for why TenZ isn't at least a top 2 player in the World and who would be above him.
Because being immature, overly aggressive and costing your team rounds is not an argument as to why he is NOT the best player in the world?
"Because he has insane stats to back him up" Stats don't matter. You must watch his games to recognize his flaws. Anyway, they got stomped by BBG omegahyperlul. That's an argument in itself.
"TenZ is easily a top 2 player in the world with Mwzera" hahahahaha cmonBruh. Stop regurgitating the shit you hear in here. Both good players. But top2? cmonbruh
Yup. As a side note, I really hope SEN don't buyout TenZ because players are already expensive, and buying TenZ would be such a financially stupid decision. If they brought zekken from Noble he would basically deliver the same performance for much, much cheaper... and personally I think zekken is a smarter player. Of course it doesn't matter if he doesn't mesh well with the team. Lots of decisions to make from Sentinels.
edited grammar
Funny how you don't understand that my point is EXACTLY that this is a team game. This wasn't even a bad game from him, it's the usual but with the enemy team properly anti strating him. This will happen more and more until he learns to control himself.
Oh, so because I'm not better than him I can't criticize him? Retarded logic.
tldr he isn't top1
People who aren't appreciating how well BBG played and are only just trash talking SEN and TenZ are probably just SEN haters or fans of washed up teams. Like how tf can this prove SEN is a bad team. They literally just won the biggest tournament in Valorant and were on a 7 win streak with a stand-in. They were bound to lose some game or another. Its not like Korea where there is only one good team. Just gonna have to wait and see if they just became trash in a week. The biggest takeaway here is BBG. They are looking really good and could be a potential contender to win the stage one(Considering how teams like Faze, 100T etc. were not able to beat SEN and BBG just owned them).
BBG played good(not gonna argue there). But Sentinels did not do their homework. Shahzam had literally nothing on BBG. Like NOTHING. It was like they were playing blindly. The next time they meet (I really hope they do) Sentinels will be ready for them, no doubts there.But there is no chance in hell that Faze or 100T or even Immortals lose against BBG.